* Knute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 08:39]:
> Ok, I've been fighting this for awhile now and I'm getting
> tired of it.
>
> It was actually the reason that I joined his list anyway.
> 8o)
>
> I can't send mail from mutt on my computer, and I'm not
> sure why.
>
> I know that my config files ar
* Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020108 08:39]:
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
> > text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
>
> Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a".
On 7-Jan-2002 19:53 Derek D. Martin wrote:
|
| Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
| like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
Have a look at http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/ for a patch which will
probably address the issues you've r
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:59:04PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > > Mike L, if you have tricks for figuring out WHICH mozilla window the
> > > page will pop up in, I'd like to see that.
>
> Yeah, that'd do it, but I'd rather just leave one up and have it use
> the same one all the time. No
David Rock wrote:
>
> understand, Evolution has an Exchange connector piece that you can
> purchase, but I really want nothing to do with Evolution if I can help
> it (although *anything* is better than Lookout).
one interesting thing is that evolution DOES use PGP/Mime for
encryption... while i
Le 07/01/02 ? 22:57, Walt Mankowski écrivit:
> I recently tried out mutt 1.3.25. This is my first look at the 1.3.*
> series of mutt. One thing I noticed right away is that mutt is no
> longer display accented characters correctly. On the index screen
> they appear as question marks. When view
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:15:57AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
>
> But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
>
> [-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 07:17:06PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Perhaps, but unless I misunderstand how mutt verifies the signature,
> even that isn't an indication that the mail was signed by the person
> the e-mail claims to be from. AFAIU, it is only an indication that
> the signature was v
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:31:35AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> Hey people.
>
> I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution
> because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$
> Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not "evolution" at all, it's more
> like a
I recently tried out mutt 1.3.25. This is my first look at the 1.3.*
series of mutt. One thing I noticed right away is that mutt is no
longer display accented characters correctly. On the index screen
they appear as question marks. When viewing the text of an email,
they appear as octal with a
On 07/01/02 Nick Wilson did speaketh:
> * Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 17:44]:
>
> Sheesh I just came from kmail!
> Like most things Unix-ish there's a fair old learning curve, but sooo
> worth it!
Yup. Most things worth anything are worth learning.
Mike
--
Michael P.
Ok, I've been fighting this for awhile now and I'm getting
tired of it.
It was actually the reason that I joined his list anyway.
8o)
I can't send mail from mutt on my computer, and I'm not
sure why.
I know that my config files are ok, cause I can send mail
from mutt from my son's login, using
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:04:10 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Me too. Now, this isn't a problem for me as using the editor (emacs
> > in my case) to do that is a better solution since I can unstrip the
> > signature (with Ctrl-_ i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 07:53:52PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone who have responded with helpful hints. For those
> > keeping score:
> >
> > > - HTML ma
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michael Montagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a macro that deletes older messages in the current folder.
> macro index T"~d>2w !~F"D"~T"
> Does anyone have any idea how I might apply this to all my folders with
> one blazingly fast keystroke
Thanks. I checked my home dir, but they weren't there. I did finally
find them in ~/Mail (I use ~/mail). I used an '=' in front of the
mailbox names, but it was before the 'set folder="~/mail"' directive,
so perhaps that's why it didn't take.
Anyway, I apologize to the list for my previous mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin wrote:
> >
> > Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
> > like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
> > really rather not ha
I have a macro that deletes older messages in the current folder.
macro index T"~d>2w !~F"D"~T"
Does anyone have any idea how I might apply this to all my folders with
one blazingly fast keystroke?
--
Michael Montagne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.boora.com
Derek D. Martin wrote:
>
> Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
> like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
> really rather not have to hit P to have a traditional PGP message
> work.
do you use procmail?
i use this to accomplish that (i kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks to everyone who have responded with helpful hints. For those
keeping score:
At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
> - forwarded messages not included in quoting
The mentioned variables seem to have solved this one.
>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 18:31:13 -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
> the person it clamed to be signed by.
Anyway, I never verify signatures, as I don't need to (at least for
the moment).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 07, Justin R. Miller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> > > message is signed.
> >
> > Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
> > the person
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Justin R. Miller hath spake thusly:
> Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> > > message is signed.
> >
> > Perhaps, but it's not enough to t
Actually, I tried the mbox-hook, cause I wanted to
compress the read messages in certain folders to one with
the same name except have the .gz extension.
Well, my messages didn't show up in my ~/Mail folder.
As it was a compressed file it was easy to find.
Basically it defaulted to saving it i
Sorry if this is pointed out in the manual...I missed it.
For those who might not think about it (like me), do NOT save your
messages (using an mbox-hook) to a mailbox which matches the regular
expression used in the same hook. For example:
mbox-hook python-list python-list-save
This will dele
Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that command didn't do much useful for me,
Did you try running it after loading post-mode?
> To turn it OFF, one would stick this in the appropriate place in
> their .emacs file:
>
> '(post-kill-quoted-sig nil)
That line alone does not do
On Jan 08, Vincent Lefevre [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 17:39:17 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Regardless, if you turned off pgp_verify_sig, you would not see the
> > "garbage" above, just the "s" in the index.
>
> But I still see some lines because of the attachment. I
Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> > message is signed.
>
> Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
> the person it clamed to be signed by.
It changes from 's' to 'S' upon verific
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 17:39:17 -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Regardless, if you turned off pgp_verify_sig, you would not see the
> "garbage" above, just the "s" in the index.
But I still see some lines because of the attachment. I would like
to see nothing.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Vincent Lefevre hath spake thusly:
>
> The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a
> message is signed.
Perhaps, but it's not enough to tell you if the message was signed by
the person it clamed to be sig
On Jan 08, Vincent Lefevre [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
>
> But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
>
> [-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante : Tue Jan
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 14:40:36 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > Occasionally, you run across a sig that's just damn cool, or otherwise
> > warrants comment. I can find no way to make mutt include the sig in
> > e-mail, temporarily
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Samuel Padgett hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmmm... well, whenever I reply to a message, everything after
> > sigdashes is stripped from the message. It's possible that my editor
> >
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like
[-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante : Tue Jan 8 00:13:02 2002) --]
gpg: Avertissement: l'utilisation de la mémo
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use vim as my editor and can't work out how to make portions of my
> text bold? I know many of you use vim so I hope someone can help.
Some MUAs will display "a^Ha" (aa) as a bold "a". Is this what
you mean?
Sam
Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm... well, whenever I reply to a message, everything after
> sigdashes is stripped from the message. It's possible that my editor
> is doing this (I use post-mode for emacs), and I'll look into that.
I'm pretty sure that post-mode does this. Yo
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:50:16PM +0100, Michael Wagner wrote:
> I have this in my mailcap file:
>
> text/html; html2text %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
>
> because the output is much better than this lynx or w3m. Try it.
The problem that I see with lynx, w3m and links is that the -du
* Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-01-2002 20:59]:
| > text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal
| > text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html %s; copiousoutput
| >
| > When I get HTML mail it automatically gets passed through lynx and
| > displayed in Mutt's pager.
On Jan 07, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> It appears that the recipient is now (1.3.25) provided as the default
> subject. At least, as far as I can tell it is, and I even went back
> to my completely-bare unpatched version to make sure. [From either
> within mutt or the command line, wh
Hi, all --
It appears that the recipient is now (1.3.25) provided as the default
subject. At least, as far as I can tell it is, and I even went back
to my completely-bare unpatched version to make sure. [From either
within mutt or the command line, when I start a new message to ,
the subject pr
Thus spake Volker Moell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Months ago there was a thread how to do this automatically. But at
> that time all tries didn't work; AFAIR there was a conceptual problem
> (endless loops or so, I don't know exactly any more). Well, to read
> one single mail I can hit Esc-P, but
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Ben Logan muttered:
> > I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it).
>
> Welcome. :)
Thanks.
> =python-list is no regex. Leave out the "=", then it should work.
Ah, yes. I tried just python-list first, (and even
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 21:36]:
% > Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
% >
% > > the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an
% > > attatchment that she had to open.
% > >
% > > That can't be
Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Secondly, mutt also supports checking of traditionally signed email
> (i.e. without conversion).
>
> P check-traditional-pgp check for classic pgp
Months ago there was a thread how to do this automatically. But at that
time all tries didn't work; AFAIR there wa
At 05:50 + 07 Jan 2002, Tom Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The trouble is that send-hook can only look at the message that's
> about to be sent, not its "parent". After a web trawl, it looks like
> the patch described in the second half of this mail
>http://www.ultraviolet.org/mail-archiv
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
% > me.
%
% Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
% into a new composition buffer?
Rather than cut-n-paste
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 at 13:40:30 -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Here's my current list of gripes:
>
> - forwarded messages not included in quoting
>
> There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
>
On Sonntag, 06. Jan. 2002 at 20:53:24, MuttER wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:30:05PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> >
> >
> > text/html; w3m -T text/html %s
> >
> >
> > You could also add a 'copiousoutput' at the end of that, and set
> > auto_view text/html in your muttrc to put w3m
So sprach »Justin R. Miller« am 2002-01-07 um 12:43:02 -0500 :
> the mail, but other than that I think that you will have to live with
> people signing list mail.
Sure. However, now that you seem to have run out of arguments, please
remember how this thread started. Somebody asked about opions
* Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 21:36]:
> Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Sorry, my post was unclear. I'm not really worried about the sig. It's
> > the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an
> > attatchment that she had to open.
> >
>
About 2 weeks ago, I took the plunge and switched to mutt as my mail
reader. It took me several hours to read the documentation and
configure mutt so that I could use it adequately. I am sharing the
results of my efforts: My .muttrc and related configuration files,
heavily commented to explain why
Derek D. Martin wrote:
> At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > > There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message
> > > in quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I
> > >
Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIK, it is up to the editor, not mutt. When in vim, go to
> ':help recover' and it will tell you what you need to know. IOW
> you can do it right from within vim.
I guess my point is that there are a lot of manual steps here:
start new composition,
Thus spake Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Sorry, my post was unclear. I'm not really worried about the sig. It's
> the fact that the body of the mail (like this text) was received as an
> attatchment that she had to open.
>
> That can't be right sure?
That is a result of Outlook not listeni
Ben Logan muttered:
> I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it).
Welcome. :)
> I decided I would try using a few mbox-hook's, and can't seem to get
> any to work. Here are what I think are the relavant lines from my
> .muttrc:
>
> set folder="~/mail"
> set move=ask-yes
> mbox-
Forgot to mention the version of Mutt that I'm using (says it in the
headers, but here it is anyway):
1.2.5i
Thanks,
Ben
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:42:46PM -0500, Ben Logan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it). I
> decided I would try using a few mbo
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> > quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
> > that I can comment on wh
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 20:51]:
> Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> > Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would
> > cause my emails to be sent as attachments rather than inline(if that's
> > the right term)?
>
> this is mutt's default behavior. you can do:
> pgp_
Nick Wilson wrote:
> Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would
> cause my emails to be sent as attachments rather than inline(if that's
> the right term)?
this is mutt's default behavior. you can do:
pgp_create_traditional
but this still sends it as 'application/pgp-sig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> >There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> >quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
> >that I can comment on what the original writer wrote. Maybe a way
> >does exist, since it seems intui
Hi all
I'm certain this is something I've done but just can't work out what.
I just spoke to my mum who said the email I'd sent had come through as
an attachment as opposed to in the body of the message when she opened
it?
Actually, two attachments one of which is the pgp sig. What would cause
m
> - clearsigned and/or ascii-armored messages
>
> Whether you guys like it or not, most of the rest of the world uses
> clearsigning and ascii-armored plaintext messages. Mutt falls down
> here. You apparently refuse to support this, which makes no sense
> since the majority of the PGP-using
Thus spake Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> that said, it would be cool if there were 'forward_inline' and
> 'forward_quoted' options or something.
See $forward_quote :-)
--
Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Samuel Padgett wrote:
> > vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
> > me.
>
> Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
> into a new composition buffer?
>
> I was hoping Mutt had some facility to notice /tmp/mutt-* files
> t
Derek D. Martin wrote:
> There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> quoted text.
why not just reply and then change the 'To' header.
you can delete the 'in-reply-to' if you're worried about messing up
headers.
that said, it would be cool if there were 'forward_inline
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:53:05PM -0600, David Champion [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > > - there's just too much noise
> > >
> > > I don't know what to do ab
Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A better way to handle this is to run screen on your work machine. Then
> when your connection drops, simply re-logon to your work machine, run
> 'screen -r' to re-attach the screen session, and pick up where you left
> off.
This is a really good idea.
Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> vim -r will give you a list of recoverable temp files. Rarely fails
> me.
Yes, but then how do I actually send the message. Cut-n-paste
into a new composition buffer?
I was hoping Mutt had some facility to notice /tmp/mutt-* files
that are unsent and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, David Champion hath spake thusly:
> This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
> Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
These worked for me (using mutt 1.3.22.1)
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Erika Pacholleck hath spake thusly:
> [05.01.02 13:44 -0600] rhad <-- :
> > running fetchmail ...
> > This in turn gave me lovely error output:
> > rhad-linux:/home/rhad # fetchmail -v --keep -a >> /var/log/fetchmail
> > fetchm
On 2002.01.07, in <20020107113541.GA629@shanti>,
"Franco Vite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> before my browser was
>
> 1 r L 29 dic [MaX] 0,3K Archivi ML PPC?
> 2 F 30 dic [Franco Vite] 0,8K >
>
> Now is
>
> 1 r L 29 dic [MaX] 0,3K Archivi ML PPC?
> 2 F 30
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Benjamin Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > - there's just too much noise
> >
> > I don't know what to do about that, except to post less often myself.
>
> And, ironically, he mailed the list to tell u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like Mutt's motto: All e-mail clients suck; mutt just sucks less.
And I used to believe it too, until I started trying to use GPG
regularly. I switched from Pine to mutt specifically for its built-in
support for PGP/GPG. But I found that either I
[sab 05/01/2002, ore 12:57] => Aaron Schrab scrive:
> At 11:33 +0100 05 Jan 2002, Franco Vite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But: if I want to put the right signature when I replay (epmovi with
> > .signature.epmovi, default From with .signature and so on [I've many
> > accounts...]), how I ca
[05.01.02 13:44 -0600] rhad <-- :
> running fetchmail ...
> This in turn gave me lovely error output:
> rhad-linux:/home/rhad # fetchmail -v --keep -a >> /var/log/fetchmail
> fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed
SMTP is a sendmail/alternate matter.
I am using postfix for this purpose, so I
On 2002.01.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I mean /like/ HTML, but *not* HTML as I dump anything of nature
> also. I guess my understanding of real ASCII text is mistaken. I thought
> that because I saw bold text in mails sent to me (back when I was
> ex
Gary Johnson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > - there's just too much noise
>
> I don't know what to do about that, except to post less often myself.
>
> Gary
And, ironically, he mailed the list to tell us why he's unsubscribing
instead of just unsubscribing. =)
--
Ben Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:05:39PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> I have been on this list since 1997, and I'm unsubscribing because
>
> - too many mails on the list are signed, which slows down processing
>immensly
Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do.
> - there's just
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:43:02PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> I would say to look at it like a mailing list signature that you have no
> say in. Perhaps you could make procmail remove it, or otherwise modify
> the mail, but other than that I think that you will have to live with
> people s
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:44:09PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
> I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
> connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
> and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
> composing a message. Is there a good way t
Thus spake Alexander Skwar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Look into the archives and into the Web to find out why PGP is a
> > good thing.
>
> Of course it's a good thing. No doubt about that. But not for
> mailinglist mails. And also not for usenet news.
This has been discussed often on this and
On Mon, Jan 7, 2002, Samuel Padgett wrote:
> I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
> connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
> and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
> composing a message. Is there a good way to recover these
> co
I sometimes ssh into my machine from work and use Mutt. The
connection through the firewall, however, is, uh, a bit tenuous
and often gets dropped. Sometimes this happens when I am
composing a message. Is there a good way to recover these
compositions and pick up where I left off?
I'm using Vi
Hello,
I've been using Mutt for some time now (and really like it). I
decided I would try using a few mbox-hook's, and can't seem to get any
to work. Here are what I think are the relavant lines from my .muttrc:
set folder="~/mail"
set move=ask-yes
mbox-hook =python-list =python-list-save
Jus
Hello mutters,
after using mutt more than three months now, I am very pleased with it.
It does nearly everything I want it to (and every day a bit more).
One thing I haven't found out until today, was an automated way of
finding maildir-style mailboxes. All solutions I found so far used
mbox-sty
So sprach »Cristian« am 2002-01-07 um 18:03:24 +0100 :
> you have not signed your message, so all the remarks I am going to
> make may not apply to the real Alexander Skwar. Maybe some villain
> wanted to make Alexander look daft by forging that email.
Even if so, it wouldn't matter much. Just b
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:20:08PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:04:25PM +, Tom Jones wrote:
> > [setting From: in replies depending on which of my addresses was a
> > rcpt of the original mail]
> >
> > > Sure. Set 'alternates' to a regular expression that describe
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:52:19AM +0300, Im Eunjea wrote:
> * Tom Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-06 00:53]:
> >
> > (2)when replying to a message, look at the delivered-to, to, cc,
> > etc headers. If one of them is in the list from (1), set the From: header
> > to that. Otherwise set the Fr
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:32:58PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> Hi Dallam,
> although I don't have a solution to your problem, I think that
> debugging will become easier if you uninstall unnecessary software
> like geheimnis and gpa. Mutt does not need them.
You are correct I am sure, as I become m
Alexander Skwar writes:
> So sprach »Steve Kennedy« am 2002-01-07 um 12:52:25 + :
> > Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
> > necessary ?
>
> No, it's not. Personal mails and "important" mails should be signed
> and/or encrypted. However mailinglist mails should n
Dear Alexander,
you have not signed your message, so all the remarks I am going to
make may not apply to the real Alexander Skwar. Maybe some villain
wanted to make Alexander look daft by forging that email.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 05:36:43PM +0100, Alexander Skwar (?) wrote:
> No, it's not. Pe
* Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020107 17:44]:
>
> Hey people.
>
> I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution
> because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$
> Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not "evolution" at all, it's more
> like a step backwa
Kenneth Pronovici muttered:
> Can someone tell me how I can save an entire thread from my inbox to a
> different folder? I thought I would just be able to tag the thread
> and save the tagged messages, but I can't figure out how to do that.
tag-thread "-t"
tag-prefix ";"
save-message "s"
i
So sprach »Steve Kennedy« am 2002-01-07 um 12:52:25 + :
> Why does everyone send signed emails to the list, is it always
> necessary ?
No, it's not. Personal mails and "important" mails should be signed
and/or encrypted. However mailinglist mails should not be encrypted,
because those mails
> http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html
>
> tag-thread ESC t tag/untag all messages in the current thread
> tag-prefix ; apply next command to tagged entries
Thanks, both of you. Had tag-prefix remapped and didn't realize it. That's
exactly what I needed.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pr
Hi Dallam,
although I don't have a solution to your problem, I think that
debugging will become easier if you uninstall unnecessary software
like geheimnis and gpa. Mutt does not need them.
Have you made sure that your key is in the secret keyring, too? Try:
gpg --list-secret-keys
To me this do
Hey people.
I just wanted to share a sentiment. At work I'm playing with Evolution
because of all of these nuts around me obsessed with M$
Lookout!. IMHO, Evolution 1.0 is not "evolution" at all, it's more
like a step backwards. I _greatly_ prefer my Mutt + Exim + Procmail +
Fetchmail setup to
* Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-07 10:02]:
> I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the list over the
> last month, but I can't find it in the archives. Can someone tell me
> how I can save an entire thread from my inbox to a different folder?
> I thought I would j
Kenneth --
...and then Kenneth Pronovici said...
%
% I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the list over the
% last month, but I can't find it in the archives. Can someone tell me
I know it was there; I saw it, too -- or at least I saw something.
All I could find on a quick sea
I thought I remembered seeing something about this in the list over the
last month, but I can't find it in the archives. Can someone tell me
how I can save an entire thread from my inbox to a different folder?
I thought I would just be able to tag the thread and save the tagged
messages, but I ca
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
