-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > 
> > Mutt sucks much less (for me) today!  =8^)  I'd still really really
> > like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
> > really rather not have to hit <esc>P to have a traditional PGP message
> > work.
> 
> do you use procmail?

Yes.

> 
> i use this to accomplish that (i know you or someone mentioned problems
> with this; i personally haven't encountered any)

Yes, I've used this.  It doesn't always work.  I don't recall what the
problem was though.  I don't run into it often enough to have it fresh
in my mind, but I did run into it often enough for it to be painful.

- -- 
Derek Martin               [EMAIL PROTECTED]    
- ---------------------------------------------
I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG!
GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu
Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8OkfPdjdlQoHP510RAn+WAJ98yB9jpvbjV2DFnaNOUVhKWYM3egCfeKhd
AuhYPuBip6zzyYWw+IRSK+M=
=Nakl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to