On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> Hey,
>
> can someone explain the character dialog to me?
>
> What does 'Toggle all' do?
Toggle all the stuff in that group that has been altered from the
default. That is, if you have some selected text and some of that
text is bold and you have se
with this patch the epsi-files are detected and
converted correct.
Does somebody knows why
convert file.epsi file
fails??
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
Index: lib/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-
Hey,
can someone explain the character dialog to me?
What does 'Toggle all' do?
What do 'never toggle' and 'always toggle' mean?
I don't quite follow what's going on here so I don't feel I can
implement the GNOME version.
Cheers,
--
==
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Lately I've been thinking about the layout of the GNOME dialogs. My
> goal is to stick as closely as possible to the Gnome-2 Human interface
> Guidelines (http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/).
>
> One of the requirements for th
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 01:10:54PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> No, the 1.2.x branch is happy with automake-1.4. There have been
> plenty of changes in configure.in and such in 1.3.0cvs.
try a make distclean. It's definitely not happy. Especially the Qt
frontend, but that's by the by
regards
john
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> > Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
> >> >
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:49:46PM -0400, Laurent Duperval wrote:
> Making distclean in lib
> make[1]: Entering directory
>`/usr/local/soft/lyx/src/default/i686_pc_linux_gnu/lyx-devel/lib'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../config.status', needed by `Makefile'. Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving d
In CVS, make distclean fails as follows:
Making distclean in lib
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/soft/lyx/src/default/i686_pc_linux_gnu/lyx-devel/lib'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../config.status', needed by `Makefile'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/soft/lyx/src
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | Andre> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:28:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
> | Andre> wrote:
> >>> | boost is starting to be a PITA m
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:41:55PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > It's not the 1.2.0 document at all. My LyX (1.3.0 CVS) crashes upon
> > entering math environment (i.e. clicking on the Math-ed tool button).
>
> There was indeed something fishy in the parser, at least the e
Lars or Jean-Marc,
Can you update the attached on the LyX sites?
It mentions the Redhat-6.2 broken egcs compiler.
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
http://sylvan.com/~kayvan
> "Osvaldo" == Osvaldo Fornaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Osvaldo> El Mar 04 Jun 2002 07:16, escribió:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:07:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > -
>> double const cos_a = cos(angle); > - double const sin_a =
>> sin(angle); > + double const cos_a = cos(-angle); > + d
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | What
Lars> about getting rid of it? Even if we decide to use it later,
Lars> we'll | have to seriously update it, no?
Lars> Yes.
Lars> nuke it.
Done.
JMarc
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> As per Lars' request, here is a copy of the report:
Fixed. I renamed unique_id to uniqueID.
JMarc
Ran in src/ to avoid counting boost etc.
Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC)= 115,602
Development Effort Estimate, Person-Years (Person-Months) = 29.32 (351.82)
(Basic COCOMO model, Person-Months = 2.4 * (KSLOC**1.05))
Schedule Estimate, Years (Months)
> "Helge" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Helge> The xfig ext. inset in 1.2.0 works if there's other graphichs
Helge> in the document, not when it is alone.
Helge> This because "other" graphics insert a /usepackage{graphicx}
Helge> that doesn't appear when using the inset only.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:33:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> boost api is described at www.boost.org, there also the assert is
>> explained.
>
| I can find no such explanation in bind.html
Look in function then. (as that is what we use)
| An
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:33:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> boost api is described at www.boost.org, there also the assert is
> explained.
I can find no such explanation in bind.html
And certainly no explanation of why it crashes with 2.96 not 3.1...
john
--
"Do you mean to tell m
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:25:47AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> We end up working on 1.2.x and leave 1.3.0 there were it is until we
>> are able to work on it again. You tried the new stuff and that is more
>> than ok, you got our responses which say,
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:08:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> It is _only_ lyx code we are talking about, no changes should be done
>> to the boost code.
>> _why_ should you need to know anything about boost internals?
>
| How many times do we
Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 05-Jun-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>for your interest ...
>>
>>http://www.dante.de, the German TeX User Group, is the official
>>sponsor of the LyX Developers Meeting.
>>
>
> Did you organize this? Was this the official announcement?
> What does that mean in Euro #:O)
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:25:47AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> We end up working on 1.2.x and leave 1.3.0 there were it is until we
> are able to work on it again. You tried the new stuff and that is more
> than ok, you got our responses which say, well it works, but at what costs!
It doesn't
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> It is _only_ lyx code we are talking about, no changes
Lars> should be | Lars> done to the boos
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:08:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It is _only_ lyx code we are talking about, no changes should be done
> to the boost code.
> _why_ should you need to know anything about boost internals?
How many times do we have to say the same thing ? When you get an asse
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> What do you sysadmins belive to be the difference between rh 7.1
Lars> and 7.2?
Lars> Both can use the same kernal, and also the same graphics
Lars> drivers...
Basically, what they o is create their own distribution, in the s
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 02:00:38PM +0200, geof wrote:
> For the dialogs, it certainly possible. But I suppose there are other xfree86
> dependent parts in lyx. What about libXpm?
Work is underway to remove all such dependencies in the BRANCH_GUII
CVS branch
regards
john
--
"Do you mean to te
On Tuesday 07 May 2002 09:03, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:41:02PM +0200, geof wrote:
> > I'm new on this mailing list but I'm using lyx for a long time now.
> > I have some questions about the lyx-server and how to use it.
> > My idea is to use the lyx-server to access the Ma
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> | Same at INRIA. Digital workstations are with gcc 2.95.2, and
| Lars> linux | ones recently got upgraded to rh7.1.
>
| Lars> Do you _really_ think that we should always cat
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | A few can't even compile the stuff
>>
>> who?
>
| Users? Any of Konni's colleagues with their standard boxes. Anybody with a
| disk limit of 50 MB (which makes about 8000 studen
On 05-Jun-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Developpers? Me at home, Juergen at home...
And head that "Juergen at home" will most probably be the only
developement station for me for the time being.
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vig
On 05-Jun-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> for your interest ...
>
> http://www.dante.de, the German TeX User Group, is the official
> sponsor of the LyX Developers Meeting.
Did you organize this? Was this the official announcement?
What does that mean in Euro #:O)
A really curious,
Jug
> Same as in the tabular-dialog? Well you don't need a button controler
> if you do that, but what you need is a lot of interaction with the
> main core as the dialogs should update automatically to the new cursor
> position. After that you cannot f.ex. apply a paragraph layout to more
> than one
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> It is _only_ lyx code we are talking about, no changes should be
| Lars> done to the boost code. _why_ should you need to know anything
| Lars> about boost internals?
>
| To
> It is possible. Certainly a port of the dialogs could begin now.
> However, that requires someone to have access to an OS/X machine and
> time and coding skills.
For the dialogs, it certainly possible. But I suppose there are other xfree86
dependent parts in lyx. What about libXpm?
g
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Do you _really_ think that we should always cater to the gcd of our
> _users_ (and incompetent sysadmins... why upgrade to rh 7.1 when rh
> 7.2 has been out for half a year) ? Hey... lets move back to gcc 2.7.3
BTW: Other pack
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Same at INRIA. Digital workstations are with gcc 2.95.2, and linux
> | ones recently got upgraded to rh7.1.
>
> Do you _really_ think that we should always cater to the gcd of our
> _users_ (and incompetent sysadmins... why
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | Same at INRIA. Digital workstations are with gcc 2.95.2, and
Lars> linux | ones recently got upgraded to rh7.1.
Lars> Do you _really_ think that we should always cater to the gcd of
Lars> our _users_ (and incompetent sysadmi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Andre> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:28:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
| Andre> wrote:
>>> | boost is starting to be a PITA much as XTL was before its time
>>> and | beyond readily avail
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | A few can't even compile the stuff
>
> who?
Users? Any of Konni's colleagues with their standard boxes. Anybody with a
disk limit of 50 MB (which makes about 8000 students in Chemnitz out of
which might be a few interested
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> It is _only_ lyx code we are talking about, no changes should be
Lars> done to the boost code. _why_ should you need to know anything
Lars> about boost internals?
To understand what the hell we can do to reduce its bloat.
Lar
for your interest ...
http://www.dante.de, the German TeX User Group, is the official
sponsor of the LyX Developers Meeting.
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:28:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre> wrote:
>> | boost is starting to be a PITA much as XTL was before its time
>> and | beyond readily available compilers.
>>
>> But now the compilers are available
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:28:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | boost is starting to be a PITA much as XTL was before its time and
> | beyond readily available compilers.
>
> But now the compilers are available...
One real world example: Konni got her first official g++ 2.95 at work abo
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:26:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
>> >> at alternative solutions.
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 05-Jun-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
at alte
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> What you won't understand that we just cannot help you. Well
Juergen> I'm speaking from my part. What should I do that could help
Juergen> your, if not backing out some of the "new" features you
Juergen> introduced. The problem
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:26:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
> >> at alternative solutions.
> >
> | Lars: You lost quite a few of us. There
The xfig ext. inset in 1.2.0 works if there's
other graphichs in the document, not when it is
alone.
This because "other" graphics
insert a /usepackage{graphicx} that
doesn't appear when using the inset only.
Editing .lyx/external_templates
and changing the xfig requirement from
graphics to grap
On 05-Jun-2002 Michael Koziarski wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Lately I've been thinking about the layout of the GNOME dialogs. My
> goal is to stick as closely as possible to the Gnome-2 Human interface
> Guidelines (http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/).
>
> One of the requirements for this
On 05-Jun-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
>>> at alternative solutions.
>>
>| Lars: You lost quite a f
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:25:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I am willing to live with this as long as I am confident that:
>>
>>- compilers get better
>>- we can fix our code and build system to:
>> - reduce comp
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
>> > at alternative solutions.
>>
>> Lars: You lost quite a few o
Hey all,
Lately I've been thinking about the layout of the GNOME dialogs. My
goal is to stick as closely as possible to the Gnome-2 Human interface
Guidelines (http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/).
One of the requirements for this is that properties dialogs should
automatically apply,
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
>> at alternative solutions.
>
| Lars: You lost quite a few of us. There aren't too many people left who
| ar
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:25:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am willing to live with this as long as I am confident that:
>
>- compilers get better
>- we can fix our code and build system to:
> - reduce compile times
> - recude binary size
>
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:32:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | And do we need that? I seem to remember you saying to you turned them
>> | on just to see whether people would complain.
>>
>> And no one has complained, that means that we do no
R. Lahaye wrote:
> It's not the 1.2.0 document at all. My LyX (1.3.0 CVS) crashes upon
> entering math environment (i.e. clicking on the Math-ed tool button).
>
> Something is very wrong here at my end, apparently.
> I'll investigate further.
> It could be related to having too high version numb
On 05-Jun-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> These are arguments in the real world. Compile times of more than an hour
> and 563MB for a single build means that I can't use three out of four boxes
> that I use regularly, including /all/ I have at home.
>
> The latter alone reduces the time I can poten
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, geof wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 June 2002 07:10, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, geof wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I don't know if there is a lot MacOsX user. But since macx is based on a
> > > BSD system, do you think if it's possible to port the interface of lyx t
It's not quite as simple as errors after a newline not being removed.
Some are, but those in the overly long testcase aren't. I will
investigate this weekend.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 07:10, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, geof wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I don't know if there is a lot MacOsX user. But since macx is based on a
> > BSD system, do you think if it's possible to port the interface of lyx to
> > Aqua?
>
> It is possible. Certainly a
> "Osvaldo" == Osvaldo Fornaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Osvaldo> El Mar 04 Jun 2002 07:16, escribió:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:07:52AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > -
>> double const cos_a = cos(angle); > - double const sin_a =
>> sin(angle); > + double const cos_a = cos(-angle); > + d
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:41:55PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> It's not the 1.2.0 document at all. My LyX (1.3.0 CVS) crashes upon
> entering math environment (i.e. clicking on the Math-ed tool button).
There was indeed something fishy in the parser, at least the error message
ws bogus. Could you t
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:47:35PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or even look
> > at alternative solutions.
>
> Lars: You lost quite a few of us. There aren't too many people left who
> a
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:27:32PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > Attached.
>
> Works for me.
>
> *shrug*
>
> Maybe a clean checkout or at least an 'rm *.[Ch] ; cvs update' in
> src/mathed?
It's not the 1.2.0 document at all. My LyX (1.3.0 CVS) crashes upon
entering mat
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:27:32PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Attached.
Works for me.
*shrug*
Maybe a clean checkout or at least an 'rm *.[Ch] ; cvs update' in
src/mathed?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:23:03PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > When I save a document in LyX 1.2.0, that contains math environment,
> > that will crash LyX 1.3.0 after loading that document.
> >
> > I created a minimized document; File->New, then one character in
> > math
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:23:03PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> When I save a document in LyX 1.2.0, that contains math environment,
> that will crash LyX 1.3.0 after loading that document.
>
> I created a minimized document; File->New, then one character in
> math enviroment. Here is the gdb-backtr
Hi,
When I save a document in LyX 1.2.0, that contains math environment,
that will crash LyX 1.3.0 after loading that document.
I created a minimized document; File->New, then one character in
math enviroment. Here is the gdb-backtrace:
$ gdb src/lyx
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software F
69 matches
Mail list logo
