Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> | Same at INRIA. Digital workstations are with gcc 2.95.2, and
| Lars> linux | ones recently got upgraded to rh7.1.
>
| Lars> Do you _really_ think that we should always cater to the gcd of
| Lars> our _users_ (and incompetent sysadmins... why upgrade to rh 7.1
| Lars> when rh 7.2 has been out for half a year) ? Hey... lets move
| Lars> back to gcc 2.7.3
>
| Maybe because one has to add AFS support in the kernel, make sure it
| exists for the right kernel version, that it has no incompatibility
| with the sun/alpha servers we also have, make sure that the XFree
| version works correctly with _all_ the graphics cards used on the
| site, etc.
What do you sysadmins belive to be the difference between rh 7.1 and
7.2?
Both can use the same kernal, and also the same graphics drivers...
--
Lgb
