Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> It is _only_ lyx code we are talking about, no changes should be | Lars> done to the boost code. _why_ should you need to know anything | Lars> about boost internals? > | To understand what the hell we can do to reduce its bloat.
Concentrate on _our_ bloat first, instead of tackling others. We surely have enough of it. | Let's continue on a more constructive note. Has anybody looked at | sigslot (http://sigslot.sf.net)? It claims to be lightweight and not | very demanding on compilers... Of course, I have no idea of what is a | good signal implementation. It is a lot simpler than both SigC++ and boost::signals, it might be that it is powerful enought for our use, but AFAIK it has never been tried on UNIX at all. -- Lgb
