Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:32:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | And do we need that? I seem to remember you saying to you turned them
>> | on just to see whether people would complain.
>>
>> And no one has complained, that means that we do not have to do dirty
>> hacks with third party C++ libraries such as boost.
>
| Maybe it has escaped your attention that a few people were not too happy
| with the size increase. There have been actually quite a few messages on
| this list, some even from someone faking your headers...
The difference is that I am _just_ unhappy with the size increase, I
can live with the increased file size, the increased binary size and
the slow compile times. (But of course this is a burdon on me as
well, I have to delete one build to have room for the next...). I am
willing to live with this as long as I am confident that:
- compilers get better
- we can fix our code and build system to:
- reduce compile times
- recude binary size
- reduce disk usage
--
Lgb
