On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:45:34PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:19:50PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >> The past few weeks I looked at what is holding up the new website.
> >
> > - still some CSS issu
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:19:50PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> The past few weeks I looked at what is holding up the new website.
>
> - still some CSS issues.
Would it be worth trying to recruit someone to work on the CSS again?
I
Hi Jan,
Il giorno sab, 10/04/2010 alle 20.19 +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen ha
scritto:
> Yesterday I fixed a texi2html node translation problem, skeleton
> files (untranslated files with most only @untranslated markers)
> are no longer necessary.
>
> I have fixed scripts/build/website_post.py and today
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 08:19:50PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> The past few weeks I looked at what is holding up the new website.
Other issues are:
- need a redesign/rethink of introduction. That's pending me
looking at stuff and making some decisions.
- some manual links in the "stable"
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:16:36PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> ***Untranslated docs
> We have untranslated docs that are not built, their matching links
> should not contain the .es. part.
>
> Music-glossary
> Snippets
> Internals
> Contributor
> have all broken links for this reason;
> The spanish word for "download" is "descartes" ? Weird, in
> english that's the name of a famous philosopher.
Actually, that's in French... ;)
Kieren.
>
> You should probably fix your translation in download.itexi, then,
> since that file uses "Descargas".
>
>>> Could you fix those build er
2010/3/8 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:38:57PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
>> > > Could you fix those build errors?
>> >
>> > I have a single core CPU in my skull.
>>
>> how much cpu time is required to edit Documentation/es/web.texi to
>> replace "Download" with "Descartes" ???
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:38:57PM +, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > Could you fix those build errors?
> >
> > I have a single core CPU in my skull.
>
> how much cpu time is required to edit Documentation/es/web.texi to
> replace "Download" with "Descartes" ???
I'm sorry. I just noticed that
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:26:11PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2010/3/8 Graham Percival :
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:16:36PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> >> I have discovered that a few issues remain.
> >
> > Yes, including links to Download
>
> >that should be Descartes or
> > whatever t
2010/3/8 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:16:36PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> I have discovered that a few issues remain.
>
> Yes, including links to Download
I didn't forgot it. It is very visible, so no need to remember it.
>that should be Descartes or
> whatever the word is.
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:16:36PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote:
> I have discovered that a few issues remain.
Yes, including links to Download that should be Descartes or
whatever the word is. Could you fix those build errors?
Cheers,
- Graham
___
li
2010/3/8 Graham Percival :
> that is, "new location for the new website":
> http://lilypond.org/website/
>
> this avoids apache not allowing dirindex in a home directory for some
> silly reasons. I now see all the pages in spanish, including the
> "Todos" page, which makes me sad because fixing
Le lundi 04 janvier 2010 à 15:03 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> I just fixed two of the gradient images in master. I didn't notice
> them before because they are not currently used in the CSS. :-)
Great! I'm not sure whether the gradient image of this ones for hover
(for the first item of
Le lundi 04 janvier 2010 à 14:18 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> 2010/1/4 John Mandereau :
> > Current style of this button you changed is better, but what about using
> > lily-home-nav-{bg,hover,active}.png backgrounds in exactly the same
> > situations as the first navigation bar? If you like
2010/1/4 John Mandereau :
> Le lundi 04 janvier 2010 à 14:18 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
>> 2010/1/4 John Mandereau :
>> > Current style of this button you changed is better, but what about using
>> > lily-home-nav-{bg,hover,active}.png backgrounds in exactly the same
>> > situations as the fi
2010/1/4 John Mandereau :
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 18:56 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
>> I think that using the chapter name instead of "(main)" would be
>> perfect. I'll take care of the CSS problem tonight.
>
> Current style of this button you changed is better, but what about using
> l
Le lundi 04 janvier 2010 à 15:03 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> I just fixed two of the gradient images in master. I didn't notice
> them before because they are not currently used in the CSS. :-)
>
> For the CSS, you'll want to use nav-bg-2.png, nav-hover-2.png, and
> nav-active-2.png on th
Le samedi 02 janvier 2010 à 18:56 -0800, Patrick McCarty a écrit :
> I think that using the chapter name instead of "(main)" would be
> perfect. I'll take care of the CSS problem tonight.
Current style of this button you changed is better, but what about using
lily-home-nav-{bg,hover,active}.png
Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 02:13 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > There is a quite explicit path with links at the bottom of each page,
>
> If it's confusing, it's confusing.
I'm not sure what you mean here.
> How is it confusing? The first time somebody clicks on it,
> they'll discove
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote:
>> > the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
>> > section of the page currently viewed is already reachab
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 03:07:57AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 01:52 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > When you're clicked through a few options in a chapter, you've
> > been staring at the highlighted second-level TOC changing. It's
> > not obvious how to get b
Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 01:52 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> When you're clicked through a few options in a chapter, you've
> been staring at the highlighted second-level TOC changing. It's
> not obvious how to get back to the first page, if you want to see
> the overview of pages in tha
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote:
> > the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
> > section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top
> > bar. Therefore, I'm for removing it; how
On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I'm wondering about i18n the string "(main)" in the navigation bar of
> the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent
> section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top
> bar. Therefore, I'm for re
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:04:13PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 17 août 2009 à 21:31 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > 1. I have jpg files in Documentation/pictures/out-www/, but they
> > don't get copied to out-www/offline-root/Documentation/pictures/.
> > All the pngs are copied, t
Le lundi 17 août 2009 à 21:31 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> 1. I have jpg files in Documentation/pictures/out-www/, but they
> don't get copied to out-www/offline-root/Documentation/pictures/.
> All the pngs are copied, though.
Fixed (but untested).
> 2. We currently have filenames in the
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> So, instead, we can say that, *if* anyone should complain
>
> - users are greatly helped by/need clear image logos
> - every single project has it's own unreadable legalese
> and we cannot afford the time and money to get a lawyer
> go over this
> - it str
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:56:57AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 30-06-2009 om 01:42 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
> > Since my contributions are directly proportional to my amount of
> > panty-knottedness, shouldn't you deliberately knot them? ;)
> > (seriousl
Op dinsdag 30-06-2009 om 01:42 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Since my contributions are directly proportional to my amount of
> panty-knottedness, shouldn't you deliberately knot them? ;)
> (seriously, "immense irritation" is the most motivating factor for
> me working on lilyp
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> So, instead, we can say that, *if* anyone should complain
>
> - it strikes us that these legalese are in place to prevent
> misuse/slander etc, and *not* to slow down other free software
> projects, or hinder other free
Op dinsdag 30-06-2009 om 00:59 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> > > Why dont you just leave them, and remove them if someone sends a
> > > nastygram?
> >
> > +1.
>
> Because if anybody complains, it's kind-of hard to pretend it was
> an innocent mistake after this archived, publ
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:15:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op maandag 29-06-2009 om 22:55 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
> Nienhuys:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila
> > wrote:
> > > 2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
> > >> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. L
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:13:26PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Windows logos are not free and they are problematic. These are in
> commons and can be used:
>
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Microsoft_Windows_logos
Heh, I like the imitation logo.
Could you take a screenshot of a b
Op maandag 29-06-2009 om 22:55 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen
Nienhuys:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > 2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
> >> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. Let's stop wasting our
> >> time and simply remove every graphical logo from the we
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
>> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. Let's stop wasting our
>> time and simply remove every graphical logo from the website.
>
> I agree. It does not worth the headache.
Why dont you just leave them, and
2009/6/29 Graham Percival :
> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. Let's stop wasting our
> time and simply remove every graphical logo from the website.
I agree. It does not worth the headache.
> (... ok, I suppose we *could* have a column-center-bottom area at
> the bottom of the Download
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:54:05PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> With regarding to the use of logos in the downolad pages, and
> specifically about the Linux Tux logo, it can be freely used but the
> author Larry Ewing is to be acknowledged.
Thanks for looking into all this. I must admit that I
>From Apple legal, but not specifically for the X (from Mac Os X) logo,
and if the webpage is a 'publication', we have this:
When using the marks in publications that will be distributed only
in the United States, include the appropriate TM, SM, or ® symbol on
first use. For publications that
Windows logos are not free and they are problematic. These are in
commons and can be used:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Microsoft_Windows_logos
The official logo is used in German wikipedia with a warning, but I
don't read German:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Logo_Microsoft_W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 04:47:25 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 07:00:57PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> > 2009/6/9 Graham Percival :
> > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:22:53PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > That can, and wi
Graham Percival a écrit :
Hmm. I guess we could rename AU to "General Information" or
something like that?
What would be the form of that "General Information"? A manual or a
website? Renaming AU to something
else implies keeping a manual form, doesn't it? Even if you heavily
customize HTML
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 07:00:57PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/6/9 Graham Percival :
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:22:53PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > That can, and will, be changed with CSS. The basic content
> > doesn't dictate the slickness of the presentation!
>
> Can HTML pag
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 01:44:05AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
>> Despite that, I must admit that I misremembered the previous
>> discussion about the website. I thought we'd all agreed on
>> texi, but reading the discussion now, I see that opinions were all
>> over th
Graham Percival a écrit :
Despite that, I must admit that I misremembered the previous
discussion about the website. I thought we'd all agreed on
texi, but reading the discussion now, I see that opinions were all
over the map. :|
IIRC there was some consensus about writing some documents i
2009/6/9 Francisco Vila :
> Can HTML pages produced with texi2html have arbitrary
> or tags? Are they easily produced from the
> texinfo source? If so, you are right and all that is feasible in
> CSSZenGarden --for example-- from the very same source is also
> feasible for us by changing _only_ t
2009/6/9 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:22:53PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>> > In the hopes of convincing Han-Wen that we should include the
>> > website in the main branch, I've done my first pass at rearranging
>>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:22:53PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > In the hopes of convincing Han-Wen that we should include the
> > website in the main branch, I've done my first pass at rearranging
> > it. You can see it in the web-g
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> In the hopes of convincing Han-Wen that we should include the
> website in the main branch, I've done my first pass at rearranging
> it. You can see it in the web-gop/ branch (cd texinfo && make),
> or here:
>
> http://percival-music.ca/blo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Juergen Reuter wrote:
>
> >
> > Of course, the "Tutorial (start here)" should *not* point to the
> > combined tutorial / user manual page, but *only* to the tutorial.
> > Otherwise, the title of the link should be considered wrong.
> >
>
> ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Nothing could be simpler!
>
> BTW, the new website does look rather funky!
> If I have any criticism, it took me a little while to find the online tech
> documentation from the new front screen :(
> Apart from that, it looks like an awesome amount of work has gone into
I don't know if this has been commented on already (I haven't processed
all those emails yet), but could we split up the tutorial pages? It
takes much too long to load, even going from a local copy. And since
most tutorial readers are newbies, we should treat them as gently as
possible. :)
Chee
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:51:56 +0200
> # pick out something from our TODO list. Read it by running
>
>grep TODO `find`
>
> on the source archive.
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$ grep TODO `find`
> bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
You're running it in th
> And since
most tutorial readers are newbies, we should treat them as gently as
possible. :)
Hi,
Please allow a newbie to comment on this.
I actually prefer to have a one-page-contains-it-all version,
because it is easier to have your browser search for
certain keywords when you are struggling
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 03:41:05 +0200 (CEST)
Juergen Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> > Of course, the "Tutorial (start here)" should *not* point to the
> > combined tutorial / user manual page, but *only* to the tutorial.
> > Otherwise, the title of the
> Han-Wen said:
> To combat the learning curve, I think that it would be better to write
> a simple program etc...
It does seem that a lot of people have difficulty in getting pass the first
hurdle, i.e. running Lilypond on the test file.
Like a lot of things, if you can get a simple thing working
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:51:56 +0200
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've added a note to
>
> http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/
>
> there's a README in CVS now.
(from that pge)
# pick out something from our TODO list. Read it by running
grep TODO `find`
on the so
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:35:52AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$ grep TODO `find`
> bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$
Try
$ find | xargs grep TODO
instead.
Cheers.
--
Julian Squires
__
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 14:35, Graham Percival wrote:
> # pick out something from our TODO list. Read it by running
>
>grep TODO `find`
>
> on the source archive.
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$ grep TODO `find`
> bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lily
Of course, the "Tutorial (start here)" should *not* point to the
combined tutorial / user manual page, but *only* to the tutorial.
Otherwise, the title of the link should be considered wrong.
I fixed the link in cvs to point to the tutorial index, to be consistent
with the user manual link. Is t
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Correct, and like Jan said: then you're doing emacs all over again.
> But an app that accepts drag and drop, I'm sure that it is easy for
> someone familiar with windows.
Hmm. What if that app is emacs? You drop a .ly file onto emacs icon,
emacs st
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:04:41 -0400
Tyler Eaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://tylere.ath.cx
>
> Comments? Criticisms? Flames?
The top looks great, apart from the LilyPond capitalization thing.
I'm no so keen of the picture. As a cellist I have no objection to the
Sarabande of Bach's second
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Juergen Reuter wrote:
>
> Of course, the "Tutorial (start here)" should *not* point to the
> combined tutorial / user manual page, but *only* to the tutorial.
> Otherwise, the title of the link should be considered wrong.
>
... but, to respect the wish for one big page, may
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know. The last time I installed the windows version is almost
> two years ago.
>
> Jan?
Yes, Chris is right. The LilyPond icon is an old concept.
> > I would be happy
> > to write such a document, but I'm not sure yet how it would integrat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
> Flippin' eck!
> I don't know how I missed it. I was probably visually drawn to the menu at
> the top of the front page, so missed the stuff at the bottom!
I changed it a little, so it stands out a teeny little better.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTE
lph Little
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: New website
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Nothing could be simpler!
>
> BTW, the new website does look rather funky!
> If I have any criticism, it took me a little while to find the online tech
> documentation from the new fr
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:36:29 +0200
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
> > On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 13:51:56 +0200
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$ grep TODO `find`
> > bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
>
> You're running it in the build directory. Try:
>
Ralph Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, the new website does look rather funky!
> If I have any criticism, it took me a little while to find the online tech
> documentation from the new front screen :(
Where did you expect to find a link named how to where?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> Dear LilyPond fans,
>
> The new website for LilyPond.org is now on-line, at
>
> http://lilypond.org/newweb/
>
> (it will probably be moved to http://lilypond.org/ shortly)
>
> Come and gawk in awe in the new website, which has cool navigation,
> u
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:04:00 +0200
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefaan Himpe wrote:
> >> most tutorial readers are newbies, we should treat them as gently
> >> as possible. :)
> >
> > I actually prefer to have a one-page-contains-it-all version,
> > because it is easier to have yo
Stefaan Himpe wrote:
> And since
most tutorial readers are newbies, we should treat them as gently as
possible. :)
Hi,
Please allow a newbie to comment on this.
I actually prefer to have a one-page-contains-it-all version,
because it is easier to have your browser search for
certain keywords
Graham Percival writes:
> I don't know if this has been commented on already (I haven't processed
> all those emails yet), but could we split up the tutorial pages?
Which urls are we talking about?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.x
"Chris Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So the user edits their .ly code in MS Notepad, and compiles and views it by
> dragging it into the world's most powerful text editor?? :)
Yes, maybe I /am/ being silly.
It's just that we (Cygwin) now have an easy and verifyable install,
and we could
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:43:28 -0400
Julian Squires <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 05:35:52AM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$ grep TODO `find`
> > bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/lilypond$
>
> $ find | xa
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Correct, and like Jan said: then you're doing emacs all over again.
>> But an app that accepts drag and drop, I'm sure that it is easy for
>> someone familiar with windows.
>
> Hmm. What if that app is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > To combat the learning curve, I think that it would be better to write
> > a simple program, where you can drag & drop a .ly file, which is then
> > processed. If successful, either the PDF is put on the screen, or a
> > window with error messages would be shown. My hu
[flup set]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Chris Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gramatically and stylishly -> grammatically and stylishly
>
> Actually, I mean "grammatically and stylistically". Also on
>
ok.
> * http://lilypond.org/web/download/getting-started.html,
>
> "(double c
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Tyler Eaves wrote:
> Comments? Criticisms? Flames?
Beatiful flower, but a the complete logo is big for an icon.
Isn't the name written as LilyPond; the words lily and pond are written
together as lily pond or lily-pond, as given by the search in Oxford
English Dictionary. Thu
(Taking this to the list again... )
Tyler: can you double check your email setup: I get
The original message was received at Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
from byrd.xs4all.nl [213.84.26.127]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
le
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: New website
Ralph Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, the new website does look rather funky!
> If I have any criticism, it took me a little while to find the online tech
> documentation from the new front screen :(
Where did you e
"Chris Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the ideal app would have its own text editor to write .ly code, and
> a "log" window for output messages or errors. Also it might be neater if it
> had its own PS or PDF viewer built in. I've no concept how much work it
> would to take to imple
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To combat the learning curve, I think that it would be better to write
> a simple program, where you can drag & drop a .ly file, which is then
> processed. If successful, either the PDF is put on the screen, or a
> window with error messages would be s
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't know. The last time I installed the windows version is almost
> > two years ago.
> >
> > Jan?
>
> Yes, Chris is right. The LilyPond icon is an old concept.
>
> > > I would be happy
> > > to w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I agree. However, this thing may be not too easy to implement (I have
> > no idea), and having a good introduction is better than waiting for a
> > drag-and-drop app to happen?
> >
>
> In web, it would not be very hard to have such script. It would be a "try
> to wri
83 matches
Mail list logo
