On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:22:53PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Graham > Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > In the hopes of convincing Han-Wen that we should include the > > website in the main branch, I've done my first pass at rearranging > > it. You can see it in the web-gop/ branch (cd texinfo && make), > > or here: > > I am not fond of this idea, especially the idea to create the website > in Info. Websites are not texinfo documents. They are our face to > the outside, and they need to be pretty and slick, with colorful and > engaging images. With a website that looks like a dry info document > (complete with Table of contents), nobody would be interested in > trying lilypond.
That can, and will, be changed with CSS. The basic content doesn't dictate the slickness of the presentation! Despite that, I must admit that I misremembered the previous discussion about the website. I thought we'd all agreed on texi, but reading the discussion now, I see that opinions were all over the map. :| Growl. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
