Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > So, instead, we can say that, *if* anyone should complain > > - users are greatly helped by/need clear image logos > - every single project has it's own unreadable legalese > and we cannot afford the time and money to get a lawyer > go over this > - it strikes us that these legalese are in place to prevent > misuse/slander etc, and *not* to slow down other free software > projects, or hinder other free software (*your*) users? > - we still feel that the way we use all logos, is a helpful, > respectful and most probably the best possible way we can > do it. > - what would help us, is if *you* had some page up, not with > what we cannot do, but rather with helpful examples of what > we *can* do. please point us to the logo you want us to > use and we'll replace it asap, thanks! >
Jan, why do we need the logos anyway? Can you point me to other open-source projects that do this? I can't find any. http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#en-US http://gimp.org/downloads/ http://www.jedit.org/index.php?page=download http://www.gnu.org/software/mit-scheme/ http://download.plt-scheme.org/ http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/products/download.html?product=firefox-3.0.11&os=win&lang=en-US Ah, okay, I found one: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/download/ But is it really so important? - Mark _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
