2009/6/9 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:22:53PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Graham >> Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: >> > In the hopes of convincing Han-Wen that we should include the >> > website in the main branch, I've done my first pass at rearranging >> > it. You can see it in the web-gop/ branch (cd texinfo && make), >> > or here: >> >> I am not fond of this idea, especially the idea to create the website >> in Info. Websites are not texinfo documents. They are our face to >> the outside, and they need to be pretty and slick, with colorful and >> engaging images. With a website that looks like a dry info document >> (complete with Table of contents), nobody would be interested in >> trying lilypond. > > That can, and will, be changed with CSS. The basic content > doesn't dictate the slickness of the presentation! >
Can HTML pages produced with texi2html have arbitrary <div id="..."> or <whatever class="..."> tags? Are they easily produced from the texinfo source? If so, you are right and all that is feasible in CSSZenGarden --for example-- from the very same source is also feasible for us by changing _only_ the CSS. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
