On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:15:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op maandag 29-06-2009 om 22:55 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Han-Wen > Nienhuys: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Francisco Vila<paconet....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > 2009/6/29 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > > >> IMO, this whole thing is bloody bollocks. Let's stop wasting our > > >> time and simply remove every graphical logo from the website. > > > > > > I agree. It does not worth the headache. > > > > Why dont you just leave them, and remove them if someone sends a nastygram? > > +1.
Because if anybody complains, it's kind-of hard to pretend it was an innocent mistake after this archived, public discussion. > We need more nice, appropriete graphical [if possible colourful] > content. Much more, not less. Esp the download page should be nice > and attractive. I guess we can dump legalese at the bottom of the Download page, but it's a bloody mess. (partly because texi2html is adding a <p> after every image, and because the stylesheet is adding a border around the images) http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_7.html#Download I'm removing the logos from the individual download pages, though. > I still think having all distro's linux logos has a nice warm > fuzzy look. Oh mao no. Then we'd need *another* set of legalese, look up all the licenses on the individual distros, etc. This is such a blood waste of effort... - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
