On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:26:06PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On 2010-01-02, John Mandereau wrote: > > the new website, I don't understand why it's there: the topmost parent > > section of the page currently viewed is already reachable from the top > > bar. Therefore, I'm for removing it; however, if somebody gives a good > > reason for keeping it *and* proposes a nicer name for it e.g. "Up to > > toplevel section (%s)" % the actual name of up section, I'm glad to > > either implement it if it takes little time. > > I think we should remove it.
This was previously discussed in the summer; Jan asked about it. When you're clicked through a few options in a chapter, you've been staring at the highlighted second-level TOC changing. It's not obvious how to get back to the first page, if you want to see the overview of pages in that chapter again. This is a problem in the old website. It might be obvious to some people with a CS background and knowledge of trees, but I remember being confused by this more than 5 years ago. And if I can get confused, I'm certain that other people can get confused. I'll entertain a renaming (if introduction wasn't already taken, we could use that; I suppose we could even duplicate the chapter-name instead of (main)). I've already asked that the (main) link be the same color+shading as the top navbar, but that's a CSS issue and not my responsibility. But the actual second-level TOC item itself is staying. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
