On 03/12/2011 13:51, Michal Varga wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 22:46 +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 13:34 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening
Howdy,
As many of you are no doubt already aware, much work has been undertaken
to make clang the default compiler for the src tree starting with
9.0-RELEASE. It is not 100% certain that this change will be made, but
it's looking more likely every day.
This raises an interesting question for
On 03/12/2011 14:12, Charlie Kester wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency tree
for a port *before* it is installed.
portmaster doesn't _quite_ do that, but it does walk you through all of
the config screens (and thus, the related dependencies) prior to
buildi
On 03/12/2011 17:14, Rob Farmer wrote:
Also, you suddenly getting involved probably didn't help, because it
just gave the appearance that you guys were trying to double-team
Rob,
I appreciate your thoughtful response to this topic. In fairness to
Mark, I am the one who expanded the scope of d
On 03/12/2011 18:13, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Charlie Kester wrote:
A few minutes ago, I was answering a post on the forums, in which
a user expressed surprise (and outrage) that the phpmyadmin port
was installing libX11 and similar things on his server. By
installing it myself and then u
On 03/12/2011 16:00, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Mar 12, 2011, at 17:22 , b. f. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening "in private" around
here and the only way to solve that problem is to open the
doors.
Would you pl
On 3/13/2011 5:35 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Hi Doug,
I'd like to raise a couple of nits with portmaster (primarily a wish
for more configurability):
1) In v3.0, you added code to nice(1) all make(1) invocations. In some
cases, the default niceness does not suit me (in particular, I'd often
prefe
On 03/15/2011 15:16, Charlie Kester wrote:
BTW, I don't use either of these, or gimpshop, so I'm not going to fix
the ports myself. Instead, I'll leave that to anyone who's interested.
Charlie,
I think you've been very diplomatic in your approach, so to be clear I
don't have a problem with e
Wen,
The default cvsupd configuration (cvsignore to be exact) prevents the
download of files named *.core
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/CVSROOT-ports/cvsignore?rev=1.4;content-type=text%2Fplain).
The ports you recently committed have this:
cd /usr/ports/science/
grep py-obspy.core M
On 03/16/2011 02:39 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:19:48AM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:20:40PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
13.03.2011, 01:00, "Doug Barton":
Howdy,
As many of you are no doubt already aware, much wor
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ && make search name=opera
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't cha
On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd
On 03/23/2011 12:04, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/port
On 03/24/2011 01:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
This would be a good time to include ports-mgmt/pkg_search into
the base system...
It would be a better idea to put the pkg_* tools IN the ports tree
where they belong. :)
Wouldn't this lead to a chicken-egg proble
On 3/26/2011 8:22 AM, Ron (Lists) wrote:
I have a questions about the use of portmaster when upgrading multiple
ports and how to correctly use wildcards.
For example, I have this from pkg_version:
p5-Digest-SHA-5.50 < needs updating (port has 5.61)
p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38 < needs updating (port h
On 03/26/2011 10:00, Matthew Seaman wrote:
pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }' | xargs portmaster
That's a good suggestion, but if you want to use that technique, better
would be: portmaster `pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }'` so
that you can take advantage of the inte
On 03/27/2011 00:26, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/26/2011 10:00, Matthew Seaman wrote:
pkg_version -vIL= | awk '/^p5-/ { print $1 }' | xargs portmaster
That's a good suggestion, but if you want to use that technique, better
would be: portmaster `p
On 03/27/2011 03:07, J. Hellenthal wrote:
Hi Doug, ...Everyone else,
Since were on the (-i) subject here.
Do you have any plans in the near future to implement a way for
to change the default questioning response from [y] to [n] ?
No, sorry. I think it would be very confusing to the average
This has nothing to do with libksba, it's just a coincidence that
bumping the PORTREVISION on dirmngr for the libksba update caused you to
rebuild dirmngr against an up to date openldap.
Reverting to openldap-client-2.4.24 allows dirmngr to build, thus I've
changed the subject line of this mes
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what broke the
inclusion of fetch(3) support if I get a bit of time.
It seems that libldif now r
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25. I'll
take a look at CHANGES and see if I can figure out what brok
On 03/28/2011 16:44, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 16:30, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 14:20, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 13:57, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/28/2011 13:48, Xin LI wrote:
On 03/28/11 12:42, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Yup. openldap-client-2.4.24 does fine. Looks like a bug in 2.4.25
On 03/26/2011 09:47, Doug Barton wrote:
On 3/26/2011 8:22 AM, Ron (Lists) wrote:
Is there a way to get portmaster to behave like portupgrade did and only
upgrade what needs to be upgraded?
I reserve the right not only to change my mind, but also to be wrong on
occasion. :) I just ran into
On 03/29/2011 11:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
No joy. I updated openldap-client to 2.4.25_1 and than tried to rebuild
dirmngr. Same error as I had before:
/usr/local/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `fetchGetURL'
You have to disable the FETCH option. If you're building it in the port
directo
On 3/30/2011 11:55 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
Alex Kozlov schrieb:,
So why netpbm is 10.26.64 and graphics/netpbm-devel(??) is 10.35.80?
Because this is the last released tarball.
Later Version are only in Subversion.
The way this has traditionally been handled is for the maintainer to
create
On 03/31/2011 18:03, Patrick Powell wrote:
Is there an idiot simple, put this on the command line alternative to
this to handle the 3 (three) ports that require me to hand tune them?
No. The ports tree is not designed to do what you want it to do, sorry.
If it's only 3 ports, apologies if I do
Your first step on maintained ports would be to contact the maintainer.
cc'ing ports@ is ok as well. You can find the maintainer's address by
looking in the Makefile, or by typing 'make maintainer' in the port's
directory.
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' chang
Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING, and get in the habit of doing so
regularly. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :)
ommended
that I encountered the problem.
Thanks,
Jim
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING, and get in the habit of doing so regularly.
:)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
On 04/11/2011 12:15, Любомир Григоров wrote:
No one is maintaining it so I am writing here. Current version in ports is
2.0 (very outdated). Current live version in 4.0.
Please see
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html
for guidance on how you can learn t
On 04/11/2011 13:02, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote:
On 11.04.2011 23:15, Любомир Григоров wrote:
No one is maintaining it so I am writing here. Current version in
ports is
2.0 (very outdated). Current live version in 4.0.
OpenVAS 4.0 is quite different so some of the old ports need to be
removed
or r
On 4/12/2011 1:39 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
Hi Doug,
Not that this is much a improvement but thought youd like to be informed
of it. I usually try to refrain whenever possible from calling utilities
like nice(1) or renice(1) and let processes inherit their niceness be
inherited from the parent
I tried to build vlc with the following options, and it failed in the
configure phase. First the one clear and easy to address error:
configure: error: --enable-gnutls and --disable-libgcrypt are mutually
exclusive.
Fixing this allowed configure to proceed, build, and run just fine.
Next the
Remove netpbm first, then build the new version. Apparently a fix for
this is in the works.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price
On 04/25/2011 15:04, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Apr-22 14:20:06 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder
wrote:
pkg_delete -f the old netpbm and re-install the port, worked for me.
Followed by 'portmaster --check-depends' or equivalent to clean up
the dangling dependencies.
If you use portmaster t
On 04/25/2011 17:28, martinko wrote:
Ok,
I skimmed through the list of deprecated ports and I identifed the
following that I may be using or at least used in past and I could take
over their maintenance to save them from death:
Generally by the time that a port has deteriorated to the point whe
On 04/26/2011 14:18, Robert Huff wrote:
It is also possible it is only important to a fairly small
number ... but to those it is absolutely crucial.
Fair enough, then one of them needs to step forward to maintain the port. :)
FWIW, I think that the person who suggested deleting the por
On 04/26/2011 15:09, Charlie Kester wrote:
Now that I have my code proved out, I'm going to expand it to look at
all unmaintained ports regardless of category. Any suggestions for
where I should post the results? (That is, unless you think the
bitbucket is the only suitable place for it.)
As
On 04/27/2011 08:59, Mikhail T. wrote:
What is not broken -- just old, like ... or www/apache13*
apache13 is way past EOL, and the apache team is working hard to move
the default to apache22, at which point I personally hope that apache13
dies a quick and painful death :)
--
Nothin
On 04/27/2011 06:45, Jerry wrote:
I think that 'UPDATING' the PR to let the submitter know
that he/she has not been forgotten and to keep them aware of any
problems with the PR is certainly a welcome suggestion. Unfortunately,
that is rarely presently done.
If the PR is still open, it has not b
On 04/27/2011 15:39, John Marino wrote:
As you notice, I never said they are limited what they work on. The
order of the work is the focus.
John,
You (and others) seem to be very focused on the idea of what's "fair."
Specifically you seem to believe that FreeBSD committers have a duty to
ha
On 04/27/2011 13:54, Eitan Adler wrote:
Which is a*major* drain of resources. One of the reasons for ceasing
the building of packages for broken/completely obsolete is to avoid
draining the computer time building said packages.
... and in addition to CPU cycles there is also storage on the doz
Jerry,
I realize that you care deeply about this topic, however IMO your last
few posts are a little more vitriolic than we we usually like to see on
the FreeBSD lists. (And yes, I'm sure your response would be that this
is not how they were intended, so I'll save you time writing it.)
You n
If you maintain a port that specifies its pid file location in its
configuration file you may be interested in the get_pidfile_from_conf()
method that I added to rc.subr recently. The change has been MFC'ed so
it's available in RELENG_[78] as well.
To see an example of how to implement it in a
On 05/01/2011 00:12, mato wrote:
Regarding hosting the files -- one of the goals of the foundation is to
provide infrastructure for the project. And this seems like one of the
opportunities to do so. Besides, all of the ports mentioned have their
distfiles already mirrored on FreeBSD's FTP.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howdy,
If you are a portmaster user and you use one of the --packages* options
I would like to encourage you to upgrade to portmaster version 3.9. It
fixes a (rather embarrassing) omission in the dependency-updating code,
updating the +REQUIRED_BY
On 05/03/2011 04:58, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
03.05.2011 14:33, Gritsuk Anton пишет:
What does it mean? How to fix?
Some addition information:
# du -sh /usr/ports/distfiles/
853M /usr/ports/distfiles/
From man page of ports:
DISTDIR Where to find/put distfiles, normally distfiles/ in PORTSD
On 05/03/2011 14:31, Gritsuk Anton wrote:
*Hmm... very strange, but now portmaster works without previous errors*
I'm glad it worked out for you. Let me know if anything else weird happens.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK
I'm confused (yeah, I know, nothing new about that). From
ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk:
# usage:
#
# .include "bsd.port.options.mk"
#
# .include "bsd.port.pre.mk"
#
# .include "bsd.port.post.mk"
However the ports I've looked at so far all do:
OPTIONS=bl
On 5/16/2011 3:23 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
On 16 May 2011 05:18, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm confused (yeah, I know, nothing new about that). From
ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk:
# usage:
#
# .include "bsd.port.options.mk"
#
#
On 05/16/2011 13:17, Chris Rees wrote:
You can't define USE_JAVA_after_ bsd.port.pre.mk and expect JAVA_PORT
to be defined...
What I'm looking for is an actual example of something that doesn't work
for the common case. Where "actual" includes a path to a port that I can
test.
And I'm not
On 05/18/2011 15:10, Matthew Seaman wrote:
# Testing both WITH_ and WITHOUT_ is a good idea...
I'm not sure why you would need to test both, unless it's to catch wacky
stuff coming in from the environment?
The usual way is to test the opposite of the default. So for default on
you would tes
On 05/21/2011 05:36, Jerry wrote:
The port: "/net/sendemail" builds fine after the update to Perl;
however, it no longer runs. It terminates with this error message:
Subroutine IO::Socket::INET6::sockaddr_in6 redefined at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/Exporter.pm line 67.
at /usr/local/lib/perl
On 05/22/2011 14:01, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
2. How is the task best accomplished?
Will @unexec in pkg-plist do the job?
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
On 05/22/2011 15:19, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:57:56AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
What's the point?
Even minor versions of perl are stable, and odd numbers are the
development branches -- rather like the kernel of That Other Less-Free
OS.
It's updated frequently becau
On 05/24/2011 12:39, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I need 'cd' in my Makefile. It seems that the variable ${CD} is not
defined and people are using 'cd' instead.
Is there a certain reason for that?
Probably because there is no point in making a variable for it? :)
--
Nothin' ever doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/23/2011 12:51, Jon Beliveau wrote:
| On Monday, May 23, 2011 09:52:44 AM you wrote:
|> Hello
|>
|> trying to install www/linux-f10-flashplugin but it fails before even
|> downloading the file. I downloaded the file from Adobe's site and
have p
On 06/04/2011 15:07, Warren Block wrote:
On install, the ports system could show a warning:
This port will be removed from the ports tree on ${EXPIRE_DATE}.
Reasons: ${EXPIRE_REASONS}
That's basically what DEPRECATED + EXPIRATION_DATE does now.
The math on this is simple, there are maint
On 06/07/2011 12:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
ports,
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:06:28PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Ports, etc...
Would whomever checks in the next commit please fix the following
entries in UPDATING
20110503
20110427
This was also supposed to say... by adding a ':' to
Howdy,
Recently I split the mariadb port into -client and -server versions. My
next step was going to be adding support for this to bsd.databases.mk,
but it turns out that it's already there, cleverly hidden behind:
.if (${MYSQL_VER} == "52")
So I tested some stuff setting "WITH_MYSQL_VER= 52
On 06/09/2011 04:59, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:37:08PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
09.06.2011 15:36, Jerry ??:
I experienced the same phenomena. Simple do a pkg_deinstall on the
"p5-Switch" port and build the "webkit-gtk2" port" again. It works fine
then
I'm confused by this error, since it works just fine with default
settings on 7 and 8 with both amd64 and i386. Can someone give me a
suggestion on the right direction to look?
Original Message
Excerpt from the build log at
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-er
On 06/10/2011 19:36, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
Doug,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm confused by this error, since it works just fine with default
settings on 7 and 8 with both amd64 and i386. Can someone give me a
suggestion on the right direction to
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
===> Generating temporary packing list
===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed
install -o root -g wheel -m 555
/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh /usr/local/bin/ksh93
install:
On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1
===>Generating temporary packing list
===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installe
On 6/22/2011 1:28 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:23:51PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me:
===>Installing
On 06/22/2011 19:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Starting with a single directory containing a few hundred packages
(.tbz files), how would I go about converting it into the sort of
repository which portmaster could use as its --local-packagedir?
You should be able to put them in $LOCAL_PACKAG
On 06/25/2011 01:08, Carl wrote:
Well I'm not the OP, but I just experienced something very similar. This
arose when I was trying to deal with the combining of ports
print/amspsfnt and print/cmpsfont into print/font-amsfonts. As you can
see below, I had no problem upgrading print/amspsfnt, but th
On 06/27/2011 03:41, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
03.05.2011 14:33, Gritsuk Anton пишет:
I tried to update this as usually.
# pkg_version -IvL=
libwps-0.2.0 < needs updating (index has 0.2.1)
And I get error as below:
# portmaster libwps-0.2.0
===>>> The value of DISTDIR cannot be empty
===>>>
On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
.UPDATING
Log:
- Tell octave-forge* users to completely remove old ports before
reinstalling.
This is not the first time this
On 06/30/2011 20:57, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:22 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/30/2011 14:03, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
stephen 2011-06-30 21:03:43 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
. UPDATING
Log:
- Tell octave-forge* users to completely remove old
On 07/01/2011 00:16, Vasil Dimov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 15:13:12 +0300, Gritsuk Anton wrote:
It's not work for me. Why?
See the attach file.
Hi,
===>>> The dependency for science/hdf5-18^M
seems to be handled by hdf5-1.6.9_1^M
Since graphics/vigra asks for libhdf5 and that
On 07/02/2011 01:18, Douglas Thrift wrote:
I just ran into this tonight and after some searching around I found:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158550
I'm guessing it will be committed soon,
Done today.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
On 07/04/2011 17:37, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
OK, I got it, solution at the end.
On 05/07/2011 00:02, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 04.07.2011 19:42, schrieb Dominic Fandrey:
Hello,
I got enigmail 1.2 to build by changing the gecko extract dependency
target from configure to build.
It installs and
On 07/07/2011 10:21, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> Reset maintainership de jure. In fact KDE 3 has not been maintained by our
> team
> for a long time, not to mention upstream.
>
> Discussed a while ago among the KDE/FreeBSD team.
>
Certainly if the ports are not being maintained by kde@ then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/11/2011 06:21, David Wolfskill wrote:
> Per ports/UPDSATING entry 20110711, and since I use portmaster (thanks,
> Doug!),
My pleasure. :)
> I then invoked the above re-build of icu, and attempt to build the
> ports that weren't built in the p
spamassassin has the following for RUN_ and BUILD_:
${SITE_PERL}/Bundle/LWP.pm:${PORTSDIR}/www/p5-libwww
That path is no longer correct, resulting in a loop. I can fix it here
if the maintainer agrees, but it should likely be searched for all other
ports that depend on this module to be sure that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/11/2011 18:30, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 05:49:09PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> ...
>
>> I know that you already got some advice on dealing with the specific
>> port that failed, but I wanted to
Sunpoet,
Thanks for jumping on this so quickly.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
You'll likely get better results posting URls, FYI.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com
On 07/11/2011 22:51, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 12:37 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> You'll likely get better results posting URls, FYI.
>>
>>
>> Doug
>>
>
> I used to give complete URLs. Then I got told off, and told only to
> w
On 07/12/2011 07:38, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> In chromium follow to:
You can do something similar in FF with keywords, but that doesn't
really help you when the PR number is in an e-mail.
Yes, I realize it sounds incredibly lame to complain about the time it
takes to cut/paste one PR number.
On 07/12/2011 12:39, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> 12.07.2011 22:03, Doug Barton пишет:
>> On 07/12/2011 07:38, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>> In chromium follow to:
>>
>> You can do something similar in FF with keywords, but that doesn't
>> really he
On 07/12/2011 21:08, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Thinking more about it, it seems to me that instead of silently deleting
> the disallowed characters in the filename, that the port should declare
> itself broken if there are disallowed characters. That way, this
> particular error would have
On 07/12/2011 21:29, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 11:17 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/12/2011 21:08, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> Thinking more about it, it seems to me that instead of silently deleting
>>> the disallowed characters in the fil
On 07/15/2011 22:07, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Per Doug Barton's suggestion, I have reworked the long-standing patch
> to bsd.perl.mk to be an exact copy of the logic in bsd.port.mk, and
> done an -exp run. Does anyone have any objection if I commit this
> patch?
This is actually the exact opposite o
On 07/16/2011 17:35, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it from exp-runs?
>>
>> Surely it's equally risky to commit to it as bsd.port.mk, or have I missed
>> something?
>
> In a perfect world w
On 07/17/2011 03:07, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 17 July 2011 01:47, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/16/2011 17:35, Mark Linimon wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>>>> If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it f
On 07/19/2011 17:04, jsb...@speakeasy.net wrote:
>
>
> Apologies for two subjects.
Don't apologize, just don't do it. :)
> Disheartened by the perl 5.12.3 5.12.4 bump; I've figured how to upgrade
> (for some reason perl-after-upgrade does little on these machines), but
> the time to do so seems
Change is hard. :)
I have no objections to someone (or some group) choosing to maintain
portupgrade. I've always said that I don't regard portmaster and
portupgrade to be in competition.
However if no one steps up to maintain it, portupgrade will eventually
bitrot and become unusable. So for all
On 07/25/2011 03:42, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:14:19PM +0200 I heard the voice of
> Michal Varga, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> I have no objections in [portmaster's] promotion to new users as the
>> new, one and only "approved" way of managing ports, but this in no
>> wa
On 07/30/2011 10:44, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-ports.
>
> How could I run `portmaster' without ANY questions and
> confirmations?
> Simple and obvious `portmaster --no-confirm -y '
> doesn't work. It asks:
>
> (1) About interactive ports.
Portmaster is always going to notify y
On 07/30/2011 13:20, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 09:14:00PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> I maintain astro/xearth.
>> What is the meaning of the above portmaster warning?
>
> Deinstalled, reinstalled and the ORIGIN appeared.
Glad it worked out for you. This is the co
On 07/30/2011 12:38, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> 20110730:
>> AFFECTS: users of x11-toolkits/gtk20
>> AUTHOR: gn...@freebsd.org
>>
>> The gtk-update-icon-cache utility has been slipt out of the gtk20 port.
>
> A minor typo in the above line - slipt -> split.
>
>> Use the following instructions
Howdy,
I decided to do my perennial "try other window managers" thing and the
new version of xfce won the lottery. Congratulations. :)
So I have a question ... on the desktop there are 2 icons, "Home" and
"File System" that are giving errors:
The folder could not be opened
The name org.xfce.File
On 07/31/2011 04:19, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 31/07/2011 04:32 Doug Barton said the following:
>> I am not sure what you mean by "inside portmaster" is quite accurate. I
>> followed the instructions and everything worked according to plan. The
>> vast majori
On 07/31/2011 07:08, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2011/7/31, Doug Barton :
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I decided to do my perennial "try other window managers" thing and the
>> new version of xfce won the lottery. Congratulations. :)
>>
>> So I have
On 08/01/2011 05:09, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> If for X ports all the relevant data under /var/db/pkg fits into
>> fs cache, then the performance may be blazing, but once you exceed
>> the cache size the performance might become totally different.
>
> and/or the poo
On 08/01/2011 01:51, Michel Talon wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>> Unfortunately the only way to improve on this would be to not do the
>> checks on a port-by-port basis, and do them all together at the end.
>> While that sounds appealing, it would dramatically increase the code
>> complexity, and also dram
On 08/02/2011 06:14, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Second, I think that portmaster could cache the origin => pkg mapping that it
> builds while working on port A, so that it can be readily re-used for port B.
> That could also include "negative" mapping where there is no installed pkg
> for a
> given orig
801 - 900 of 1534 matches
Mail list logo
