On 07/15/2011 22:07, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Per Doug Barton's suggestion, I have reworked the long-standing patch
> to bsd.perl.mk to be an exact copy of the logic in bsd.port.mk, and
> done an -exp run. Does anyone have any objection if I commit this
> patch?
This is actually the exact opposite of what I suggested.
My suggestion is that we put all of the necessary perl stuff in
bsd.perl.mk, and in bpm we make inclusion of bsd.perl.mk conditional on
USE_PERL5. Following that change do an -exp run and ask for help fixing
any ports that don't properly define USE_PERL5.
If bsd.perl.mk is going to be included unconditionally, what's the point
of having it in a separate file?
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
