On 05/16/2011 13:17, Chris Rees wrote:
You can't define USE_JAVA_after_ bsd.port.pre.mk and expect JAVA_PORT
to be defined...
What I'm looking for is an actual example of something that doesn't work
for the common case. Where "actual" includes a path to a port that I can
test.
And I'm not trying to be a pita here, I have two goals; one is to update
my ports to use bsd.port.options.mk, and the other is to get the
documentation updated. I don't want to do either until we are all sure
that we know the facts accurately.
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
