On 07/12/2011 21:29, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 11:17 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/12/2011 21:08, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>> Thinking more about it, it seems to me that instead of silently deleting
>>> the disallowed characters in the filename, that the port should declare
>>> itself broken if there are disallowed characters.  That way, this
>>> particular error would have been caught far more easily.
>>
>> I was thinking along similar lines. My concern would be that if the
>> change to allow - and _ is done silently that it will break plists.
>>
>>
> 
> I don't see how it can break plists - a few lines later (around line
> 6440), bsd.port.mk dynamically generates the entries for plist from
> $filename.

Ah, never mind then. :)



-- 

        Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
                        -- OK Go

        Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
        Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to