On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> an error here made it fail.
>
> This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
> ---
> libavcodec/utils.c | 5 ++---
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> > > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> > > an error here ma
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
> > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> > an error here made it fail.
> >
> > This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
> >
>
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:59:31PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:35:05PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 25.01.2016 00:53, Hendrik Leppkes
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:35:05PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 25.01.2016 00:53, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > > wrote:
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 25.01.2016 00:53, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> >> On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 06:37:56PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote:
> On 02/06/2016 06:25 PM, wm4 wrote:
> >A regression in VLC. Make them fix it.
> >
>
>
> VLC = Very Lame Crap. Just kidding.
>
Please refrain from such comment, even for "kidding".
Regards,
--
Clément B.
signature.asc
Descripti
On 06.02.2016 18:55, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:46:59 +0100
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> You're not constructive.
>
> Even if that is true, neither are you.
I try to be constructive. The problem is that all proposed alternative
ways (change VLC to use one thread for hwaccel and fall bac
On 06.02.2016 18:52, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 2/6/16, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> On 06.02.2016 18:25, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100
>>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
All of that has been said before.
>>>
>>> Indeed.
>>
>> Thus nothing changed and I still intend to apply these
wm4 googlemail.com> writes:
> You want to revert a change that was often discussed
> and found to be the best way to go about the issue,
Please remind me again how I can reproduce the "issue",
I seem to have forgotten.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
___
ffm
On 2/6/2016 2:46 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Thus nothing changed and I still intend to apply these patches soon.
No you wont, that's not how it works. This patch has one person in favor
and more than one against. It can't be applied.
How to solve this? Convince those against, either with argum
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:46:59 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 18:25, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100
> > Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >
> >> On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100
> >>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> This has
On 2/6/16, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 18:25, wm4 wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100
>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>
>>> On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> This has nothing to do with my convenience. It
On 06.02.2016 18:25, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100
>>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
This has nothing to do with my convenience. It is about fixing an
important regression
On 02/06/2016 06:25 PM, wm4 wrote:
A regression in VLC. Make them fix it.
VLC = Very Lame Crap. Just kidding.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100
> > Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >
> >> On 06.02.2016 17:42, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100
> >>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >>>
>
On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> On 06.02.2016 17:42, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100
>>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>>
On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100
> Andre
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 17:42, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100
> > Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >
> >> On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100
> >>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> So what d
On 06.02.2016 17:42, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100
>>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
So what do you suggest instead to get VLC's hwaccels working again soon?
>>>
>>> Send a pa
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100
> > Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >
> >> On 06.02.2016 17:31, wm4 wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:25:42 +0100
> >>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >>>
>
On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> On 06.02.2016 17:31, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:25:42 +0100
>>> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>>
On 27.01.2016 01:22, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S.
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 17:31, wm4 wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:25:42 +0100
> > Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >
> >> On 27.01.2016 01:22, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >>> On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Please wait un
On 06.02.2016 17:31, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:25:42 +0100
> Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>
>> On 27.01.2016 01:22, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>>> On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Please wait until my patch is finished.
>>>
>>> Do you think that will happen in the coming d
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:25:42 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 27.01.2016 01:22, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> > On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Please wait until my patch is finished.
> >
> > Do you think that will happen in the coming days?
>
> This seems not to be the c
On 27.01.2016 01:22, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Please wait until my patch is finished.
>
> Do you think that will happen in the coming days?
This seems not to be the case, so I intend to push these two
patches soon.
They can easily be reverted once
Hi Ronald,
On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This patch still disables hwaccel instead of disabling threading.
Yes.
> This isn't gonna work.
It will work at least as well as FFmpeg 2.8
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 25.01.2016 00:53, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> >> On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM
On 25.01.2016 00:53, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>> On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>>> wrote:
Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 08:01:02PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:39:49PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Mon
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:39:49PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:01 AM, wm4 wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:03:01 -0500
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:39:49PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:01 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:03:01 -0500
> >> "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On Sun,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:01 AM, wm4 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:03:01 -0500
>> "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> > > Unfortunately that
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:01 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:03:01 -0500
> "Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
> > wrote:
>
>
> > > Unfortunately that doesn't alleviate the other issues, like the
> > > complexity needed in th
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 20:03:01 -0500
"Ronald S. Bultje" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately that doesn't alleviate the other issues, like the
> > complexity needed in the decoders during frame threading, or the extra
> > resources needed
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Hendrik Leppkes
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>>> Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without
>>> trying to actually converge to a point that might so
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Sa
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:55:00AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
> andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> >> Both of you ke
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Ronald S. Bultje
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:28 AM, wm4 wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:50
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> >> Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without
> >> trying
On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without
>> trying to actually converge to a point that might somehow be mutually
>> acceptable. I'm getting very grumbly here.
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without
> > trying to actually converge to a point that might somehow be mutually
> > acceptable. I'm get
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without
> trying to actually converge to a point that might somehow be mutually
> acceptable. I'm getting very grumbly here.
>
I'm not trying to be unreasonable here, all I'
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ronald S. Bultje
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:28 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:50:32 +0100
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 14:10, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > You guys need a mediator, I hear JB is very good at that. Neither of you
> is
> > listening at all to what the other person is saying.
> >
> > Can y
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:28 AM, wm4 wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:50:32 +0100
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, A
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 8:28 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:50:32 +0100
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > > wrote:
> > > > VLC uses hwaccel with frame th
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:50:32 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> > > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> > > an error here mad
On 23.01.2016 14:10, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> You guys need a mediator, I hear JB is very good at that. Neither of you is
> listening at all to what the other person is saying.
>
> Can you two figure out what is working, what is not, under what conditions,
> and document that in a way that is und
On 23.01.2016 12:27, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>> Not fixing serious regressions is not acceptable.
>
> Then do so without introducing new ones.
This change can't introduce new regressions as it simply reverts the
behavior to what it wa
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> >> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> >> an err
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
> > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> > an error here made it fail.
> >
> > This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
> >
>
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:10:26 +0100
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> > wrote:
> >> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> >> an error here made it fail.
> >>
> >> This
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 12:19, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
>> wrote:
>>> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> VLC
On 23.01.2016 12:19, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
>>> wrote:
VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
>>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
>> wrote:
>>> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
>>> an error here made it fail.
>>>
>>> This regressio
On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> wrote:
>> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
>> an error here made it fail.
>>
>> This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
>>
>
> I'm still opposed to thi
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
wrote:
> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
> an error here made it fail.
>
> This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
>
I'm still opposed to this, and so is everyone else that commented on the issue.
A
VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning
an error here made it fail.
This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun
---
libavcodec/utils.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/utils.c
60 matches
Mail list logo
