On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote: > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100 > Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> On 06.02.2016 17:42, wm4 wrote: >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100 >>> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100 >>>>> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> So what do you suggest instead to get VLC's hwaccels working again soon? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Send a patch to VLC. >>>> >>>> Writing such a patch is not easy. >>>> Feel free to prove me wrong by doing it. >>> >>> We don't give in to blackmail (which is pretty what that VLC dev did) >> >> I think you misunderstood something. >> We shouldn't gratuitously break API users. > > It's not an API break. > >>> just because it's more convenient for you. >> >> This has nothing to do with my convenience. It is about fixing an >> important regression caused by a commit you reviewed. > > It's not a regression in FFmpeg or its API.
That's splitting hairs. VLC's hwaccels worked before that commit and don't work after it, which is a clear regression. All of that has been said before. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
