On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 23.01.2016 15:10, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Both of you keep shouting from one side of the room to the other without >>> trying to actually converge to a point that might somehow be mutually >>> acceptable. I'm getting very grumbly here. >>> >> >> I'm not trying to be unreasonable here, all I'm asking for at this >> point is to make sure the new vp9 hwaccel doesn't break spectacularly >> when MT is turned on before its allowed back. > > OK, that would be fine with me. > > Do you agree that the attached patch is sufficient for this? >
YUV420P will not remain the only format available for hwaccel, I already have some work pending to allow Profile2/10-bit as well, so the check should be further out. It would also log every time the function executes, no matter if hwaccel is requested or not, unfortunately I don't see a way to fix that nicely since the decoder doesn't know if the user is going to activate hwaccel. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
