On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100 Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100 > > Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 06.02.2016 17:31, wm4 wrote: > >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:25:42 +0100 > >>> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 27.01.2016 01:22, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >>>>> On 27.01.2016 01:16, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >>>>>> Please wait until my patch is finished. > >>>>> > >>>>> Do you think that will happen in the coming days? > >>>> > >>>> This seems not to be the case, so I intend to push these two > >>>> patches soon. > >>>> They can easily be reverted once your patch is ready. > >>> > >>> I disagree with pushing those patches. > >> > >> So what do you suggest instead to get VLC's hwaccels working again soon? > > > > Send a patch to VLC. > > Writing such a patch is not easy. > Feel free to prove me wrong by doing it. We don't give in to blackmail (which is pretty what that VLC dev did) just because it's more convenient for you. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
