On 23.01.2016 12:19, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun > <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun >>> <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning >>>> an error here made it fail. >>>> >>>> This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae. >>>> >>> >>> I'm still opposed to this, and so is everyone else that commented on the >>> issue. >> >> That's not true. >> >>> Also, the vp9 hwaccel will most definitely misbehave with MT, so this >>> one needs to be re-factored before MT is allowed at the very least. >> >> Feel free to propose an alternative patch fixing the regression your >> commit introduced. But unless you do so soon, I intend to apply this >> patch to make VLC with hwaccel usable again until you find a better >> solution. >> > > Applying a patch that knowingly breaks code with opposition from a > developer is not acceptable.
Not fixing serious regressions is not acceptable. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
