On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100 Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100 > > Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 06.02.2016 17:42, wm4 wrote: > >>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:38:45 +0100 > >>> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 06.02.2016 17:35, wm4 wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:32:12 +0100 > >>>>> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> So what do you suggest instead to get VLC's hwaccels working again > >>>>>> soon? > >>>>> > >>>>> Send a patch to VLC. > >>>> > >>>> Writing such a patch is not easy. > >>>> Feel free to prove me wrong by doing it. > >>> > >>> We don't give in to blackmail (which is pretty what that VLC dev did) > >> > >> I think you misunderstood something. > >> We shouldn't gratuitously break API users. > > > > It's not an API break. > > > >>> just because it's more convenient for you. > >> > >> This has nothing to do with my convenience. It is about fixing an > >> important regression caused by a commit you reviewed. > > > > It's not a regression in FFmpeg or its API. > > That's splitting hairs. > VLC's hwaccels worked before that commit and don't work after it, > which is a clear regression. A regression in VLC. Make them fix it. > All of that has been said before. Indeed. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
