On 2/6/16, Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 06.02.2016 18:25, wm4 wrote: >> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 18:15:37 +0100 >> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 06.02.2016 18:02, wm4 wrote: >>>> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:48:17 +0100 >>>> Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> This has nothing to do with my convenience. It is about fixing an >>>>> important regression caused by a commit you reviewed. >>>> >>>> It's not a regression in FFmpeg or its API. >>> >>> That's splitting hairs. >>> VLC's hwaccels worked before that commit and don't work after it, >>> which is a clear regression. >> >> A regression in VLC. Make them fix it. > > You're not constructive. I doubt you'd like being told that when a > change in ffmpeg broke mpv in a similar way and couldn't easily be > fixed there. > >>> All of that has been said before. >> >> Indeed. > > Thus nothing changed and I still intend to apply these patches soon.
Even when everybody is against? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
