Hi, On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc > wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun > > <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning > > > an error here made it fail. > > > > > > This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae. > > > > > > > I'm still opposed to this, and so is everyone else that commented on the > issue. > > Also, the vp9 hwaccel will most definitely misbehave with MT, so this > > one needs to be re-factored before MT is allowed at the very least. > > vp9 has been fixed > > from IRC: > > <michaelni> BBB, can the vp9 & hwaccel-mt patches be applied or is there a > reason to wait ? > <BBB> no reason to wait, can be applied > <BBB> sorry, I haven’t kept track very closely of that patch > <BBB> I can apply if you want, but it’s probably faster if you merge for me > <BBB> I believe with that patch, we can revert the previous patch that > prevented mt+hwaccel, as andreas requested > <BBB> it will still not work for dxva2, but that’s unrelated to vp9 since > it fails for h264 also > <michaelni> i can apply the patchs, i just dont want to step on anyones > toes, the vp9 one seems clear but which is the 2nd one, the one from anreas > that changes it to a warning or revert 31741ae ? > > just want to make double sure i dont step on anyones toes, thus asking > on the ML here too before applying the patch I think it's fine to apply, please ask for Hendrik's opinion also. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
