On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 11:42:54AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun > <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning > > an error here made it fail. > > > > This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae. > > > > I'm still opposed to this, and so is everyone else that commented on the > issue. > Also, the vp9 hwaccel will most definitely misbehave with MT, so this > one needs to be re-factored before MT is allowed at the very least.
vp9 has been fixed from IRC: <michaelni> BBB, can the vp9 & hwaccel-mt patches be applied or is there a reason to wait ? <BBB> no reason to wait, can be applied <BBB> sorry, I haven’t kept track very closely of that patch <BBB> I can apply if you want, but it’s probably faster if you merge for me <BBB> I believe with that patch, we can revert the previous patch that prevented mt+hwaccel, as andreas requested <BBB> it will still not work for dxva2, but that’s unrelated to vp9 since it fails for h264 also <michaelni> i can apply the patchs, i just dont want to step on anyones toes, the vp9 one seems clear but which is the 2nd one, the one from anreas that changes it to a warning or revert 31741ae ? just want to make double sure i dont step on anyones toes, thus asking on the ML here too before applying the patch [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
