On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 23.01.2016 12:19, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun >> <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> On 23.01.2016 11:42, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun >>>> <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> VLC uses hwaccel with frame threads and it works fine, but returning >>>>> an error here made it fail. >>>>> >>>>> This regression was introduced in commit 31741ae. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm still opposed to this, and so is everyone else that commented on the >>>> issue. >>> >>> That's not true. >>> >>>> Also, the vp9 hwaccel will most definitely misbehave with MT, so this >>>> one needs to be re-factored before MT is allowed at the very least. >>> >>> Feel free to propose an alternative patch fixing the regression your >>> commit introduced. But unless you do so soon, I intend to apply this >>> patch to make VLC with hwaccel usable again until you find a better >>> solution. >>> >> >> Applying a patch that knowingly breaks code with opposition from a >> developer is not acceptable. > > Not fixing serious regressions is not acceptable.
Then do so without introducing new ones. As far as I can see on the ML, you are the only one considering this a "serious regression". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
