Re: Berlin Buzzwords BarCamp

I am definitely in - full-in :) On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:28 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > I'll be at the conference and will certainly try to be at the Bar Camp too. > > Like me, I know there would be other folks from the Apache Lucene and > Solr projects at the conference, but I'm not sure how many

Re: A page telling the project history would be better than "I'm an original creator of Apache Foo"

Side comment: Is it possible to remove that email that produces a clearly AI generated nonsense response :) ? It did trigger my answer, but we should ban it regardless :) But - to the point of your proposal Tison. I think it's ok for the people who created it to say "I am the original creator".

Re: [DISCUSS] Consensus to make release candidates publicly accessible during the voting period

Sorry " should be *not *to encourage the projects to make it easy for anyone to install and test the release" -> "should be to encourage the projects to make it easy for anyone to install and test the release" On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 1:06 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Consensus to make release candidates publicly accessible during the voting period

Just a small thing to add - while we are releasing RCs, I think the right approach should be not to encourage the projects to make it easy for anyone to install and test the release - which does not automatically mean to publish RC in the same way the final candidate is published. The key here is t

[jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-382) Prepare a proposal for Policy for Helm Charts and Container images ASF policies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17895349#comment-17895349 ] Jarek Potiuk commented on COMDEV-382: - That was sooo long ago that I have comple

Re: Re[2]: Consensus? we do have a glossary (was:Refactor of "new pmc member" doc...)

I think Christopher nailed it. Now when I think of it the difference is that consensus is **not** a vote. It's a belief that we have an agreement and if someone disagrees, then we can start voting (or discussing). Maybe (proposal) renaming it to "unanimous vote" would be better. And keep consensus

Re: Consensus? we do have a glossary (was:Refactor of "new pmc member" doc...)

Comment: I also have a natural inclination to think that consensus is a bit different than "allow veto". But, well, technically that's it. But I think there is a subtle difference between consensus and "I have the right to veto" thing - especially that consensus is all about getting people united,

Re: Should HelpWanted be shut down?

First time hear of the helpwanted.a.o. We do not need to develop anything for projects that are on GitHub Github has long-time standard "good-first-issue" label, that is not only standard but also they are automatically listed when you go to github.com/apache/airflow/contribute for example - it's

Re: Should HelpWanted be shut down?

cially with the "projects" features, you can easily use and organize issues in GitHub for any kind of activities - I will talk to Briana who is our community manager, I think she will love idea of organising this. J On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:07 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > O

Re: missing commit stats for a few projects

> I'm actually not sure where the discussion of the requirements for a tooling position is happening. I just know it's not here. Maybe someone else in this discussion can help with that then. On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 5:27 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2024, 11:03 AM Jar

Re: missing commit stats for a few projects

> > > Except that every single time this comes up i beg people to volunteer and > help. Here's me, going that again. > This is exactly the point I want to make. Those tools, board and the tooling person position of ours should not "beg" for it. They should find creative ways to make it happen. The

Re: missing commit stats for a few projects

> I doubt many people are interested in building software for internal use. Look at Pony Mail I think this nails it as the root cause of the problem. This is always the thing where people expect the "common infrastructure tool" to "just work" - when it does, they have absolutely no reason to learn

Re: Proposal for a Working Group - wg-targetted-mentoring

I am in. I will think of a name :) On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:48 PM Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > I'd like to propose a new Working Group. I'm not certain the name is > right, but I can't think of anything better... Help needed on that! > > For helping match Apache Projects who'd like new contri

Re: Siren by OpenSSF

I signed up too. J. On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:43 AM Arnout Engelen wrote: > (adding security-disc...@community.apache.org for visibility) > > Looks interesting, I signed up. > > As this is a post-disclosure channel, ideally we don't really expect to > learn about new vulnerabilities here, but

Re: [WG] Workgroups update

Out of those, I'd encourage everyone to also take a look at the advisors which I think if we collectively execute it right, might make a big difference on how people are perceiving the ASF. I personally would like that quite a number of people who are active members will take on the "advisors" rol

Re: [WG: Badging] Tooling

rote: > > > Hi Jarek, > > > > You raised interesting discussion points but I would prefer not to > discuss > > specific examples in a public mailing list, since they may spark > > unnecessary controversy and derail from the focus of the working group. > > >

Re: [WG: Badging] Tooling

I like the idea of having "A" badging system that is seen as "ASF accepted" that any PMC (at PMC level) or any person (at ASF level) might opt-in to use I think such badging system - providing that it's "ASF generally accepted" concept that is defined well - possibly adopted from others like Fedor

Re: [WG: Sharpeners] Propose: milder name

I liked the Sharpener name. It's been nice to have something "cooler" than regular term. But I agree having Advisor which needs no explanation and without any extra words explains the extent to which actions of the Advisor should be considered is a very good property that might help to promote the

Re: [WG: Sharpeners] Proposed: Escalation advice

Yes. We had discussion (and slack conversation) with Rich and I shared some of the same questions and possible clarifications in the docs (which I will also propose PRs for in a few days as I am pursuing Biathlon World Championships this weekend with my wife - in Czech Republic most of the time :)

Re: [jira] [Commented] (COMDEV-543) Sharpeners use cases

I have been refraining from commenting so far but I am just about to catch-up on several other Foundation'y thing and while I generally see it as a good idea (and I would gladly volunteer my time to sharpen some projects if I am accepted as a Sharpener) but there are few details in here that give m

Re: ASF booth at OpenSource Experience Paris

Fantastic. Good to hear all that Ryan :) On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:30 PM Ryan Skraba wrote: > > Hey all, I just wanted to report back to the community about this event. > > I was only there for one of the two days. There were about 5 of us, > which was satisfying because some of us could stay at

Re: FOSDEM 2024

So as Sharan corrected me (thanks)- it's for stands. not talks (facepalm) Sorry for the alarm! J. On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 1:53 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Also if you wanted to submit a talk. I just realized after looking at > FOSDEM website after this message that FOSDEM m

Re: FOSDEM 2024

Also if you wanted to submit a talk. I just realized after looking at FOSDEM website after this message that FOSDEM moved their CFP submission deadline from 20th of November to *10th of November* (i.e. *TOMORROW*) https://fosdem.org/2024/news/2023-11-01-amendment-stands-cfp/ I had a reminder set f

Re: VP Conferences changes

Thanks Rich for all the spirit of the Community Over Code (AKA ApacheCon). Sharing my personal experiences, I am not sure how much you were the "Spirit" of the EU conference in Berlin, that was my first "ApacheCon" experience - but that is where I got the "Community" vibes. This is where (and beca

Re: Valid categories for projects.apache.org

I've already written about it in one of the previous talks - I think that we can have a good approximation of categories from the "Community Over Code". Except few language-specific categories there (Groovy which is clearly cut by "language" not category) pretty much tracks there are pretty nice

Re: Drop list of languages and categories?

Fully Agree. I looked at those when I recently learned about DOAP and I hoped they will give some more information, yet all my hope was gone when I looked at them. J, On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:09 PM sebb wrote: > It's a bit of a pain to maintain two copies of the lists of languages > and catego

Re: Incorrect categories in DOAPs

+1 śr., 6 wrz 2023, 14:03 użytkownik napisał: > On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 11:53 +0100, sebb wrote: > > I've just noticed that there are some DOAPs using rather odd > > categories. > > > > For example 'C', 'PHP', 'Groovy', 'SQL'. > > > > Seems to me that these are languages, not categories. > > > > I

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

will be displayed on the "projects" page - it would be grouped if they could be put together and we could see all the releases of a provider together - rather than all of them mixed together. J. On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 12:29 PM sebb wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 09:13, Jarek Po

Re: RFC: many PMCs have not provided DOAPs

We just added DOAP for airflow (core project) and I am planning to add release information for it automatically as well now when I see it working. I have a question about good practices though, before I make the next step - which is automating generation of all the DOAPs of ours. In the Apache Ai

Re: (NuttX) Re: Missing DOAP file

I think we could take categories we have for Community Over Code tracks: we have both Data Engineering and IOT second time in a row and they are pretty distinct from others. J, On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 12:04 AM sebb wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 18:38, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2023-09

Re: (NuttX) Re: Missing DOAP file

Would it also be possible to add "Data Engineering" ? I chose BigData for Airflow as the "closest" match but I would like to change it to "Data Engineering" if possible. On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 7:38 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 14:29 -0300, Alan C. Assis wrote: > > Hi Rich, > > >

Re: Releasing with lazy consensus

d earlier. That is, `log4j-core` needs to be > released first so that `log4j-bom` can be updated and released. Put another > way, both can't be released simultaneously. > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 9:24 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > I would love to hear about it, but I be

Re: Releasing with lazy consensus

I would love to hear about it, but I believe releasing any software is an "act of Foundation" and requires 3 explicit PMC members to say "+1" in order for it to have legal repercussions. So I am not so sure if releasing "software" of any kind that can be "ASF software" should be done without votin

Re: AW: [DRAFT] Email to all PMCs or Committers

Hey Chris - in case you are using Gmail, I can heartily recommend Streak ( streak.com). This is a very simple CRM with fabulous integration with Gmail. For your kind of messaging it's 100% free, you can easily prepare a (google?) spreadsheet with addresses/repos/etc, pull the whole spreadsheet int

Re: Skill based groups at the ASF

I think it's a great idea. Though I think the scope of it is probably a bit too open-ended. I think the right thing to do here is not "let's have guilds" but "let's make it easy to discover, join and participate in those guilds we have (and create new ones)". I think we already have some guilds,

Re: [DRAFT] Email to all PMCs or Committers

+1. Looks way better. On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 3:21 PM Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all and especially Rich … > > I love your version … and yes … I really need to focus more on the “what you > get” > and less on “why where you’re at sucks” sort of narrative ;-) > > Chris > > > Von: Peter Hunsberg

Re: [DRAFT] Email to all PMCs or Committers

Few comments: * make it shorter * add TL;DR; explaining in one paragraph what it is about, what effect it will have on those who receive it * add - immediately after that - mentioning that while the change is coming by default to everyone, everyone has a way to go back easily (and link to a doc ex

Re: [POLL] Should we ask Infra to change the defaults used to generate GitHub integration email subjecs?

ware.de>> wrote: > > Well, > > > > stating the obvious, I’ll add my +1 ;-) > > > > And yes Craig, I said the defaults … if you have explicitly configured your > > .asf.yaml subjects, they are left unchanged. > > > > Chris > > > > &g

Re: [POLL] Should we ask Infra to change the defaults used to generate GitHub integration email subjecs?

+1 On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:15 AM Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi Christofer, > > As long as projects with their own settings can continue to use them, I'm > > +1 > > to change the defaults for all projects. If the projects don't like being > able to use their lists again, they can always go back to

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

back full circle :) On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 7:08 PM wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 17:40 +0200, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Hmm, > > > > Is it possible to create a repo there then (apachecon-eu - until we > > rename the group) - I tried to create one with boxer -

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

> On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 15:51 +0200, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Following up with that after short holidays - how can I (and others > > from the Community over Code EU) get added to the "apachecon" group > > so > > that I can create the repository and have "

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

rovide a list of ASF members to add there as a good start. On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:38 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Yep. That would be perfect. > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:29 PM Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> We could also put something under the Apachecon ldap group, which I

Re: Simple question: Project blogs

One comment - some projects might have their own "blogs" https://airflow.apache.org/blog/ , Yes, not being the best citizen (sorry!), having our own blog link But I saw recently, there have been improvements / changes in the way how blogs are published, so maybe - if we see some incentives why fo

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

con-acasia/tree/master/themes/apachecon > > > > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:35 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > >

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

2]. > > [1]https://github.com/apache/apachecon-acasia > [2]https://github.com/apache/apachecon-acasia/tree/master/themes/apachecon > > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:35 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > >

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

Sounds like a great plan. Thanks Shane. On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 3:03 PM Shane Curcuru wrote: > To simplify (and then answer) the question: > > - You & EU organizers need a repo for the COCEU website, which will > include some new contributors, and might be used for other events later. > > - Is th

Re: Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

> > > > it might be simpler to manage if we used this PMC instead - although > > that requires some consensus from this PMC first to own something that > > really belongs to conferences. > Yeah. That's what I am really looking for :). I would also be fine to create a new group ? PMC? for that if

Setting up Git Project under comdev for Community Over Code EU

Dear ComDev friends, I need some help in determining how we should approach developing the Community Over Code EU website and I believe dev@community.a.o is the right place to ask for it. We are getting up to speed with preparation of the Community Over Code EU 2024 in Bratislava (June 3-6) and a

Re: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

Big +1 on that one. There were cases in the past that some "breaking" changes in GitHub integration were introduced already for various reasons. Given some warnings and explanations why we are doing it (basically to better fulfill our mission) it's a change that is pretty easily actionable for the

Re: Community-run MVP programs at the ASF

Good point Daniel. I like this perspective. On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:33 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 2023-06-21 19:55, Melissa Logan wrote: > > Hello CommDev people: > > > > Is there precedent at ASF for a community-run MVP program? If not, would > > anyone like to collaborate on this to help pr

Re: Community-run MVP programs at the ASF

Agree (I believe :) - at least this is my interpretation of what they say) with Bertrand, Phil, Mark. It does not sound like you need to have ASF or PMCs for that. I think each of our communities can have their own way of communicating and promoting behaviours and good things. I see no particular

Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch?

I think it's really a matter of project's choice. Those who use gitflow use main(master)/release/develop - they have all well-defined meaning and it's cool for projects using it. For other projects, main might be the default development choice if their merge/release workflow is simpler (that's air

Re: FOSS Backstage 2023

a reservation. J. On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:01 PM Sharan F wrote: > > Hi Jarek > > I land at 6.30pm on Sunday so should be available (and hungry!) around > 8pm..so count me in. > > Thanks > Sharan > > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, 13:37 Jarek Potiuk, wrote: > >

Re: FOSS Backstage 2023

eb Sharan F: > > Hi > > > > It's been a while but I plan to be at FOSS Backstage too. :-) > > > > Thanks > > Sharan > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2023, 10:47 Claude Warren, wrote: > > > >> I will be there. I am

FOSS Backstage 2023

Hello. Anyone else is planning to be at FOSS Backstage in Berlin? Quoting last year's message from Paul: FOSSBack is a Berlin-based conference on all non-technical issues in the Free and Open Source Software world: Community management, legal/compliance, project leadership, collaboration, adopti

Re: Idea: build a New Contributor Guide Tool

Yep. That's what those chatbots can do now. And what's even more interesting, the answers it gives are getting deeper and deeper (and more accurate) as long as you ask more refined questions. There are of course risks involved, but I am equally impressive how good and legible answers the bots prov

Re: Idea: build a New Contributor Guide Tool

I had some interesting discussions about it at FOSDEM and similar topics popped up - how to make first-time/new contributor onboarding more engaging and welcoming and helped, but at the same time not to over-burden ourselves with mostly repetitive questions/answers. And I would love to carry this

Re: FOSDEM 2023 Update

k to us about other open source events that were > being organised that they hoped we or our communities might be > interested in participating in. One of these was the Open System Days > Croation Linux Users Conference who have a CFP open > https://www.dorscluc.org/call-for-speakers/. We

Re: FOSDEM 2023

Ah. Better late than never (I completely missed the page). On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:08 PM Sharan F wrote: > > Hi Arnout > > Thanks for volunteering to help with booth setup. > > Booth setup starts at around 8.30am on Saturday morning and we need to have > everything setup by 10am. At the end of t

Re: How to start contributing to Apache Organisation

I think you should watch the GSoC announcements for that. You might not realise how distributed the ASF is and how it works Tanmoy, Priya. This is not a regular "corporate" structure - each project is completely independent and each PMC applies to various programs completely on their own discretio

Re: Enquiry regarding projects as a potential contributor

You should find the right project for you and ask there. We are not having insights in specific projects in "general" here. Apache Software Foundation has many projects and each of them is managed independently from each other - you need to reach out individually to each project that you find that

Re: Compatibility with RHEL8.6

You should check it for each project independently. Each project in Apache is run independently from each other, and you should check it individually for each project. Ideally - find it in the docs, then you can ask at the devlist of each project (you should find the devlist information in each of

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal of guidelines for individuals <> businesses Apache Way compliant relationships

And in case you cannot see the attachment because of mailing list policies - feel free to reach me out directly - I will send you a copy by whatever means is convenient for you. On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:43 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > And following up on another (infra thread) - feel free

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal of guidelines for individuals <> businesses Apache Way compliant relationships

And following up on another (infra thread) - feel free NOT to click on the link in the message if you are not willing to transmit anything to Google. I am attaching a PDF version of the proposal for those who prefer not to. On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Hello ev

[DISCUSS] Proposal of guidelines for individuals <> businesses Apache Way compliant relationships

Hello everyone, I would like to start a discussion on something I've been thinking and discussing with a number of people offline, before I brought it here for wider discussion. I want to (eventually) propose to the board of the ASF to publish (formally among other ASF guidelines) a document that

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

Good for me. I **might** be late 15 minutes (but I will try to finish my earlier call a bit before to be on time. On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 7:40 PM Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > Folks, > > Several of us are now either on panels or going to this event (at least 4 in > 3 panels; or petty much eve

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Mastodon instance?

We have yesterday applied to https://hub.fosstodon.org/ for an account in Apache Airflow. And I encourage others who are interested to make their own choice and do the same for their PMC. My personal opinion is that such a discussion makes very little sense if the goal is "let's get a centrally ma

Re: Tidelift

Yep. That's one of the main "DON'Ts" that are going to be there. On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 9:03 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > > ...I personally have no problem having a project support page > > that lists the individuals who accept GitHub sponsorships. Likewise I > > think i

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

s, I’d be very keen for both. > > Gj > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 10:58, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:42 AM Dirk-Willem van Gulik > > wrote: > > > > > > On 28 Oct 2022, at 17:27, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Tidelift

(PMC of Apache projects I mean of course) On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:11 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Since you wanted to have a smooth and nice cooperation - as a > courtesy, Is it possible that you explicitly put ASF there and > obligations that are not valid (especially when you

Re: Tidelift

to do either of these > things. > > Ralph > > > > > On Oct 31, 2022, at 1:47 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > I think the door was always open to work with Tidelift by the individuals. > > This has never been a problem (and recruiting individual PMC mem

Re: Tidelift

//twitter.com/joshsimmons> | @josh:josh.tel > <https://josh.tel/@josh> | bluesomewhere on IRC > TZ: US/Pacific; UTC-07:00 Mar-Nov; UTC-08:00 Nov-Mar > ad astra per aspera 🚀 > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 5:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > I have a question - what ex

Re: FOSDEM 2023

Same here. On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 1:53 PM jean-frederic clere wrote: > > On 10/16/22 16:36, sharanf wrote: > > Hi All > > > > In case you haven't heard yet. FOSDEM 2023 is > > back as an in person event. Millions of developers (ok perhaps > > thousands!) will converge

Re: Tidelift

I have a question - what exactly do you expect here? What is your ask and proposal ? I read the docs and I have not found any action that I or anyone else here could take here - (possibly that's why you did not get any response) - I looked at it several days ago but I could not find anything I coul

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

t; > (BTW - For those of you I haven't met, I just joined Constantia to support > the ASF comms and marketing efforts that Joe leads). > > Thank you! > Molly > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 5:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > I cannot agree more with all the points you ra

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

With kind regards, > > Dw > > > > > > On 27 Oct 2022, at 12:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > > > By the way, I'm pretty interested to participate on these workshops: > > > > 1.1 - Open Source Processors for the Cloud Continuum > >

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

Eclipse Foundation guys: they plan to be > there as well. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:38 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > Yep. Thanks DW :) > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:43 AM Christofer Dutz > > wrot

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

ing where the EC tries to inform > itself are very much in a spirit akin to open source; just show up, > contribute meaningfully, constructively and have knowledge/information to > bring. > > Dw > > > On 26 Oct 2022, at 23:14, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > Do you have a spe

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

Do you have a specific contact or conversation you can forward? Or is it a generic address we should find ourselves? On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:55 PM Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we probably should at least tell them as soon as possible, that we > want to attend and which seess

Re: European Commission Workshop day on Open-Source Sustainability

The subject is very interesting to me personally, I am not sure if I would be of much help - not much interaction with politicians and not much experience with it but if I can be of any help I am happy to travel too. I think I could take part in the panel: Workshop 3.4 Exploring practical solutio

Re: First contribution campaign collab?

Great idea. Happy to help with publicising and with reaching out to our contributors. I can get some good examples from the past and current (we have a more-or-less constant stream of new contributors at Airflow (in the order of 10 new contributors a week I think). Also happy to brainstorm/discuss

Re: Projects interested in student mentoring

My comments "from the trenches". I think 5 hours a week(-ish) is reasonable but quite a lot if there is no good support and "framework" to cooperate. I have quite an experience with Outreachy internships (I co-mentrored 5 interns in two rounds) and they have the minimum 5 hours/week involvement fr

Re: mentor

I think you are absolutely free to do such courses. Apache Software Foundation is volunteer driven and fully distributed organisation, and I think one of the sides of it that it does not scale to individually answer questions for people like yourself - mostly because it does not scale, because most

Re: Monthly Member's Moment - August 2022

I think it is about the last time to build the next moment? Anyone would like to prepare the next one, or are we switching to "vacation mode" ? J. On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > The July newsletter was just sent to members-announce@a.o. > > I p

Monthly Member's Moment - August 2022

The July newsletter was just sent to members-announce@a.o. I propose to target to release the next on July 5, 2022 (Friday). I think generally Friday is a good time to send it :) Anyone want to become "chief editor" for August ? Link for next template is below: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc

Re: Monthly Member's Moment - July 2022

lly cool you reached out to the Infrastructure team. Well done, > Jarek. > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > I prepared a draft which I tried to make a bit more "personal" :). I > > have reached out to infra - to get a bit more personal messa

Re: Monthly Member's Moment - July 2022

I also created https://s.apache.org/private short URL. I always lose far too much time to find it when I need it. This one should be super-easy to type-in from memory. On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > I prepared a draft which I tried to make a bit more "pers

Re: Monthly Member's Moment - July 2022

ique flair. > > I’m looking forward to what comes out in the next report. > > - Josh > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > If we are speaking of the future/experimenting - I think Members Moments > > should be much more personal and so

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022

Yep. I know. Wrong list :). Thanks Bill :) On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:44 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022

Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18 Jun 14:40:07 CEST 2022. Consider this my (binding) +1. This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an importa

Re: Monthly Member's Moment - July 2022

; I'm imagining the type of report that leadership typically reads in > other corporations. Not at the level of detail of board minutes of > course. > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 7:32 AM Josh Fischer wrote: > > > > For sure. Make it the way you think it will be best for r

Re: Monthly Member's Moment - July 2022

I am happy to, but I am afraid as chief-editor I will opt for a bit longer digest. BTW. I am thinking on how to experiment and see the actual usefulness of it rather than "anecdotal feedback". The fact that few people complained about messages being too long, does not mean that the others would no

Re: June Monthly Members Moment

s > is more :-). > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:29 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Thanks for the reminder. Josh. I updated the "mailing list digest" > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:04 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > > > > > It looks like the members an

Re: June Monthly Members Moment

Thanks for the reminder. Josh. I updated the "mailing list digest" On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:04 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > It looks like the members announce list has been set up. I'll be sending > this out later today. If anyone has any last minute changes or additions, > this is your chance. > >

Re: [Question]About promotion ambassador

100% that. On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:31 PM wrote: > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 20:07 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > I’d love to know who the specific people are that I should reach out > > to per > > Apache project to discuss collaboration around events, promotions of > > our > > projects, etc.

Re: [Question]About promotion ambassador

e could achieve this within Apache and, > no, not within current structures etc etc etc, but in a new way, please. > > Gj > > > On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 19:44, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Speaking of being ambassador - very much yes to do it, very much no to > >

Re: [Question]About promotion ambassador

Speaking of being ambassador - very much yes to do it, very much no to "official status" of being one (since I was called by Rich). IMHO. You are an ambassador or "evangelist" because you do it not because you have a "title" to do it. There is absolutely no benefit or entitlement of being appointed

Re: [DISCUSS] Crazy or good Idea?

ter that company was acquired and my position was senior enough that > all of my work belonged to them. > >> > >>> On May 11, 2022, at 10:37 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > >>> > >>> Small point of clarification: only the ICLA matters at Apache since &

Re: [DISCUSS] Crazy or good Idea?

> > > I guess my point about this is, that small startups usually have problems > of getting contracts. > > I can't count the occasions, where I generated leads at a conference. > After the conference, when we were discussing moving forward, 95% of all of > these died because the customers can't do

Re: [DISCUSS] Crazy or good Idea?

ache, and all the libraries and developer > tools will suffer. Applications depend on these things, but that’s a > problem for next quarter, not the current one. > > — > Matt Sicker > > > On May 10, 2022, at 09:02, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > So I think we are ta

  1   2   3   >