On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 13:22, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> There has been no revert from the committer since the -1 on October 24, so
> I will revert. This affects 11 Java files. This will revert the copy and
> pasting of code patterns over and over.
Seems we’re now at an impasses as Emmanuel has ve
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 09:28, sebb wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 at 09:11, Tushar Kapila wrote:
> >
> > If you only want code that is used, you can use an obfuscator? Using
> > dependencies is the way to go, IMHO. Keep concerns tight. Change in one
> > place in case of bugs and vulnerabilities
>
>
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 at 19:59, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For the upcoming 2.0.0-M1, I plan on replacing the custom WeakFastHashMap
> with the stock ConcurrentHashMap.
>
> If you think this is a bad idea, please tell us why.
It’s a good idea for the “fast” part, but the “weak” aspect a
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 at 20:45, Dávid Szigecsán wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I'm still getting familiar with things here, I'd like to share my
> thoughts on this issue. In my view, version 2.0 typically signifies a break
> in backward compatibility, which makes the second solution—changing the
> supertyp
There’s a typo on the BCEL release - should be 6.8.2 rather than 3.8.2
Niall
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Here it is for this quarter:
>
> ## Description:
> The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of
> Java-focused
> reusable libraries and components
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 12:08, Andrew Coates
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing a runtime failure using TarArchiveOutputStream when updating to
> commons-compress 1.26.0.
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/codec/Charsets
> at org.apache.commons.compress@1.26.0
>
> /org.apa
Hi Efthymiou,
I would leave it out. You could guess that the next release is going to be
3.13.0 - but that might not be the case or your change might no make it
into the next release for some reason. Making sure things like @since tags
and release notes are all correct will be handled as part of t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:51 AM, sebb wrote:
> I think Validator has some checksum code.
>
Yes, theres a checkdigit package:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-validator/apidocs/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/checkdigit/package-summary.html
Niall
>
> On 24 January 2017 at 10:1
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> +1 go for it. I'm in the unified code style camp. That's why I reformatted
> the whole code base of BeanUtils2 a while back.
>
+1 from me too.
Niall
>
> Kristian Rosenvold schrieb am Mo., 27. Juni 2016
> um
> 13:21:
>
> > 2016-06-27
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:53:37 -0500, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> I think it is indicative of the position held by many, myself included,
>> that a set of focused, math-related artifacts do not make sense at the
>> Commons component level, and should be
take place somewhere and since here its been framed as a vote, then it
would be good if those people who want to participate in a TLP effort would
do so in this thread.
Niall
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Gilles
> wrote:
>
ACM,
>> Volume 1: Algorithms 1-220." I did not hold onto the microfiche of
>> later algorithms that were published in conjunction with the ACM
>> Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS). The latest (Algorithm
>> 959) is interesting although I have no ide
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I would like to understand what happened when the such a [VOTE] passed
> previously.
>
The TLP vote passed[1] and then there were discussions about the name[2]
and composition of the PMC[3], then Phil withdrew[4] and it the idea died
a
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> We would take math through the incubator in order to build community around
> it first. If we fail to do so, then we can decide its fate at that time. We
> haven't done a good job attracting new people to math here at all. It has
> always be
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 June 2016 at 00:31, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> >
> >> Why? This was a good idea.
> >>
> >
> > The links didn't get generate
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Why? This was a good idea.
>
The links didn't get generated properly when I looked at it in the staging
area - instead of "http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-crypto/"; it was
generating "http://commons.apache.org/crypto/"; and I coul
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here:
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html
> >
>
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here:
> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html
> >
>
Hi,
Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html
I think we should include a link to it on the Commons Site - does anyone
object to that?
Thanks
Niall
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 May 2016 at 20:46, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Di., 3. Mai 2016 um
> > 22:49 Uhr:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have the need for a validator implementation that can check German
> >> identity card numbers. It's pretty s
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am sorry for the bad tone of my recent posts here. Not the nicest
> way to leave and I am sorry for that.
>
I dont think you have anything to apologize for and its disappointing to
see you leave. I can understand that you've had enough of t
Are you not concerned about forming a TLP of 7 around Math when one of the
seven is clearly not a happy camper?
Niall
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 2/5/16 12:59 PM, Gilles wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:50:10 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 2/4/16 3:59 PM, Gilles
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring,
> descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't
> be offended if others want to be more creative.
>
> My suggestion is
>
> MathComponents
>
> Hearkens back t
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/2/15 5:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, James Carman >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> [x] -1 We should not do this because...
> >>
> >> For the record, I am also
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> [x] -1 We should not do this because...
>
> For the record, I am also -1 to this code contribution, at least if done in
> this way. I would be happy to have this go through the incubator and build
> some community around it first so that we c
h into trunk.
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> Go for it! Great to see some action in jelly!
>
+1
Niall
>
>
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> > From: Niall Pemberton
> > To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P.
> Kinoshita
> >
.2.5 and Java
> 7 & 8. But I'd like to use your branch, try to fix any failing tests and
> merge back onto trunk.
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-291 to track this
> issue.
> Thanks!Bruno
>
>
> From: Niall Pemberton
> To: Commons
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with Maven2/3,
> having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions
> (src/test/java and src/main/java etc).
>
I worked on a maven branch back in 2010 here:
https://svn.apache.or
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:42 PM, sarahkm1972 wrote:
> +100 to RERO. +1000 to release before we're all dead. It's been a decade
> people. Just cut a release already. You can always cut another one later.
> Stop with the excuses
>
> Whatever you want to call it - alpha, beta, RC, final, anything. Ja
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/09/2014 11:43, Gilles a écrit :
>
> > This use case does not convince me at all: when working on a feature,
> > you always do it locally (modifying code, preparing unit tests), and
> > SVN certainly does not force you to experiment p
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/18/14, 5:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > Thought this might be of interest:
> >
> > http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html
>
> I wonder what version of DBCP they were using. Guess you have to
> dig into
Thought this might be of interest:
http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html
Niall
I dont have any idea - its not something I've ever seen brought up on the
mailing lists here.
It might be better to email the ASF security list
http://www.apache.org/security/
Niall
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can somebody tell me how CPE Entries (Prod
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/13/14, 3:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I don't see any value in test Javadocs and IMO they should be removed.
> You mean from the website, right?
>
Yes, sorry - I meant generating the test javadocs.
Niall
I
I don't see any value in test Javadocs and IMO they should be removed.
Niall
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 April 2014 18:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 4/13/14, 10:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> Agreed; will cause Java 8 Javadoc to report errors.
> >>
> >> If you don't want t
I have fixed the JavaDoc issues with JDK 1.8
Niall
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Okay, agreed.
>
> I see three options here:
> 1. fix all javadoc errors
> 2. find a way to Set Xdoclint:none only if building with java 8
> 3. accept, that 3.3.2 can not be build with ja
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > 2014-03-12 13:37 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> >
> > > [X] -1 I oppose this release because...
> > >
> > > I'm sorry to say but it is not possible to tell how to use this
> > compo
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:50 PM, André Diermann wrote:
> But will upgrading to 1.7 will solve the core "issue", that some features
> (in detail: Assertions, MethodUitl and TypeUtil) are copied subsets of
> already implemented features in other Commons projects?
>
Commons Lang actually copied Metho
I have no objection.
Niall
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> No objections or no interest?
> A few more comments would have been helpful.
>
> I am going to remove all dormant javadocs on friday or saturday.
>
> Not sure on the branding though. It is the responsibility
Hi Oliver,
The release notes wrt BEANUTILS-379 look good to me
Thanks
Niall
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Currently the Clirr report for BeanUtils in comparison with the previous
> version contains some errors. These are related to a change in
> ResultSetIterator (due
Hi,
I fixed the HTML formatting issues in the javadocs.
Niall
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Some feedback:
>
> 1) Classes with HTML formatting problems that are messing up the javadocs.
> They are likely all due to missing end tags:
> * MappedPropertyDescriptor
> * L
I would bump to version 2.0 because I dont think its clear that going from
0.9 to 1.0 is a major version change - in my mind 0.9 seems to imply "we
haven't quite completed everything we want to for 1.0"
Niall
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:52 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Now, this case is a bit weird,
I think it would be better not separate the mechanics of accepting code
from the community that comes with it. Can you be specific on who wants to
join Commons to work on BeanShell?
Niall
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> There are also a couple of Apache OpenOffice guys
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2013 11:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2013 00:39, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>> I'm not sure I understand what the big deal is. Sebb vetoed a commi
, but we had
> already agreed some while ago not to use $Date$ and I did not want to
> see that creep back in again.
No, you miss the point - not "unnecessary" - it was an invalid veto
and you should be more circumspect about casting vetos.
Niall
>> Ralph
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 23:39, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 3 March 2013 13:25, wrote:
>>>> Author: britter
>>>> Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
>
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 13:25, wrote:
>> Author: britter
>> Date: Sun Mar 3 13:25:24 2013
>> New Revision: 1452037
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1452037
>> Log:
>> Add JavaDoc and SVN Keywords
>
> -1
>
> Please don't use $Date$ - it is rendered using th
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> @author tags are no longer used, because authors are documented in pom.xml.
> I don't know the history of BeanUtils so I'm asking if there are any
> arguments against moving authors from source code files to pom.xml.
> I will wait f
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> HI Naill
>
>
> 2013/3/1 Niall Pemberton
>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - &#x
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to have some feedback on [BEANUTILS-409] - 'describe' method
> returning Incorrect array value [1]. If a bean has an array or collection
> property describe will only return the first entry of this member.
> This is, becau
http://www.ackairos.it/wmc5lt.php?s=lf
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/29/12 10:44 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> Any better suggestions for [math]?
>> Yes, as I see it there are two options.
>>
>> a.) move some parts into a profile
>
> How exactly would this work? Can we get rid of stuff that way,
> really?
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/24/12 1:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>> On 12/24/12 4:37 AM, G
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/24/12 1:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:27:57AM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/24/12 4:37 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi.
> [...]
>
> Commons Math can be downloaded from the following
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > Does anyone have expertise with BOMInputStream?
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Does anyone have expertise with BOMInputStream?
>
> I know that some XML parsers (like the one shipped with the Oracle JRE) do
> not detect UTF-32 BOMs (UTF-8 and UTF-16 BOMs are OK) but using
> BOMInputStream is supposed to fix th
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 13/03/2012 01:25, sebb a écrit :
>
>
>> I'm concerned that the CSV code may grow and grow with private
>> versions of code that could be provided by the JDK.
>>
>> By all means make sure the code is efficient in the way it uses the
>> JD
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> I think CSV is now converted to be a proper component; the website
> should synch in an hour or two.
>
> Someone needs to create a logo and store it at
>
> src/site/resources/images/csv-logo.png
>
> Also, I cannot remember how to derive the JIRA id f
+1
Niall
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
> interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
> proper.
>
> There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
> - Handle CS
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/02/2012 20:26, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> So please explain me why the PMC should "force" OGNL guys on adopting
>> a different style in a component where just a small subset of commons
>> people (mainly Struts guys) is interested.
>
> It sh
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>> I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am not
>> sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
>> build.properties. This is not mentioned in the buil
2012 15:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Niall Pemberton <
>> niall.pember...@gmail.com
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I find the behaviour of FileUtils.directoryContains() method very
>> >> strange that it would r
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> we already discussed in the past that we would like to have a nice new
> style for the site, and I would like to take advantage from a
> discussion born in the incubator ML[1] to renew the discussion,
> because our commons-fell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Good day to you all:
>>
>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because
>> I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.)
>>
>> Tag:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commo
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:32 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 03:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> I prefer to avoid maven's automated release stuff. But hey, the
>> important thing is getting a release out.
>
> Nexus != Maven; it's a staging repo.
Yup, know wha
more useable - seems the opposite to me if I
can no longer do something that I used to be able to. I also don't
understand the comment about " fighting many parts of the API" - it
seems to me that outside of ContextBase it has no impact.
Niall
> Also, what made me assume that th
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> Why is the idea plugin defined? IntelliJ hasn't needed it in a long time.
>>
>
> Good question.
>
> Should we get rid of it?
+1
> The warning at the start of all commons build is an
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Should LockableFileWriter.close() be changed from:
>
> public void close() throws IOException {
> try {
> out.close();
> } finally {
> lockFile.delete();
> }
>
> to:
>
> public boolean close() th
the idea of having dedicated Chain API as
> shown in the current implementation.
>
> Hard to take a decision...
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>&g
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> I just fixed the clirr report generation and deployed the chain2 site
>> on my personal ASF space[1], in order we can discuss the patch that
>> Elijah kindly provided.
I did mean to do this several months ago :( - but there were 2/3
Tailer bugs that I meant to have a look at. Anyway, on the basis of
"release (more-)often" then go for it - can always do a bug fix for
Tailer later.
Niall
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I'd like
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:21 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> I agree with Paul here. Extending Map (or any other class for that
> matter) when what you really want to do is encapsulate it is silly.
> Is the Context really meant to be used in any place where a Map can be
> used? I would think not.
I a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to
m2-ibiblio-rsync-repo
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-07-25, wrote:
>
>> If the URL do include the version, then it would be better to keep old
>> version online, to avoid dangling links from external web pages, mail
>> archives or documentation.
>
> Good point, thanks Luc. The Javado
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> I think the argument is the other way. You should be explaining why
>> you wouldn't simply just move to Java 5.
>
> +1 - Java 1.4 must die now.
>
>> +1 to JDK 1.5 minimum.
>
> +1
Apologies, I haven't had much time in the past few months and haven't
really been following. I'm sure you guys have done a great job and am
happy to leave the vote up to you.
Niall
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Thanks Gary.
>
> So 4 +1s.
>
> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> This is over my head. For all I know this may apply to all of our
>> components, since I think the metadata comes from Commons Parent.
>> Can someone knowled
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> This is over my head. For all I know this may apply to all of our
> components, since I think the metadata comes from Commons Parent.
> Can someone knowledgeable in OSGI please have a look and comment on
> the ticket and post back here if ther
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> If you use the Maven2 build then it should all build as expected.
>
> So it seems. I think I'll remove the release target from the ant build (so
> no-one else tries
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>
>> About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be
>> commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1? Also the
>> manifest of the jar in the binary distribution does not contain al
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 May 2011 16:46, wrote:
>> Author: nick
>> Date: Fri May 27 15:46:11 2011
>> New Revision: 1128371
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1128371&view=rev
>> Log:
>> VALIDATOR-253 - Change the groupId for 1.4 to be org.apache.commons to ma
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> You have to call for a [vote] to be release manager IIRC.
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html indicates it can be done
> with a lazy consensus, is that still correct?
Yup, lets go f
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/05/2011 15:09, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have a question regarding code usage of DBCP.
>>
>> For another pool implementation that is an Apache project,
> Out of interest, which one?
>
>> I would like to
>> submit a patch rela
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:16 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Since my work life is changing, I may just have more cycles to devote
> to my role as a PMC member. I would like to re-join the PMC. What is
> the process?
Hopefully its just a case of asking, as you have done.
Niall
-
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> IMO "domant" is just an indication of a status. If someone goes and
> keeps on working stuff ... well ... then that status is nullified by
> merit. (not through a single commit though) I don't see a reason to
> forbid svn access ...that's the
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/15/11 2:40 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 14 May 2011 17:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 5/14/11 9:09 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Sat May 14 16:09:22 2011
New Revision: 1103145
URL: http://svn.apache.org/v
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 5:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> The assembly descriptor id (e.g. src) is automatically
> appended to the name of the archives created by the assembly plugin.
>
> Up until version 2.2-beta-4 of the plugin, the tag was allowed to
> be empty, but with 2.2 this changed [1] - the id mus
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/11/11 8:40 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> On 11 April 2011 16:14, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> The point of keeping a working Ant build is for users who want to
>>> build from source and are not Maven users (many, many users in the
>>> real w
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> AFAIK, the policy is to accept non-members as mentor #2 or #3. The
> requirement is that at least one member, or better two, must be
> present.
Thats not how I understand it - mentors should be on the Incubator PMC.
http://incubator.apach
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 March 2011 02:00, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 30 March 2011 01:13, wrote:
>>>>> Author: psteitz
&
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 30 March 2011 01:13, wrote:
>>> Author: psteitz
>>> Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
>>> New Revision: 1086810
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Upgraded parent pom
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>>&g
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>>> On 29 March 2011
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>>> On 29 March 2011
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
> standardize on that process, adding so
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I would rather have a shorter title like :
>
> Commons Foo - Page name
>
> Thus the name of the component is likely to be fully visible on a browser
> tab. Otherwise you would see "Apache Commons ..." and wouldn't be able to
> figure the p
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:11, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:55 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 25 March 2011 03:50, wrote:
>>>> Author: ggregory
>>>> Date: Fri Mar 25 03:50:47
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 March 2011 03:50, wrote:
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Fri Mar 25 03:50:47 2011
>> New Revision: 1085247
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1085247&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Use a "Apache Commons Codec (TM)" the first time Codec is mentioned
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:05 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 March 2011 23:37, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 23 March 2011 23:14, Simone Tripodi wrote:
I think maven best practice would suggest to avoid groupId duplication
- for pool2 we agreed
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I just got an error in my OSGi environment because
> commons-logging-1.1.1 doesn't have the required OSGi metadata in the
> MANIFEST.
> Would you agree on releasing a 1.1.2 just to add this metadata?
Theres a note on Commons
1 - 100 of 1193 matches
Mail list logo
