On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/11/11 8:40 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >> On 11 April 2011 16:14, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The point of keeping a working Ant build is for users who want to >>> build from source and are not Maven users (many, many users in the >>> real world). >> I don't believe there are many of those users. Most just pickup the jar >> I oppose duplicate build systems at this point, even though I dislike maven. > > We can argue about this and speculate, but I have done the work to > restore the Ant build for the 3.0 release and I would really like to > give those users who want to be able to build a [lang] jar from > source without downloading boatloads of irrelevant dependencies to > be able to do that. Are you opposed to that? In other words, is > this a -1 on my commit? If so, I will revert it.
If there is someone prepared to maintain the ant build for a component, then I think keep it. Niall > Phil >> Note that Hibernate requires Gradle to build, so requiring maven >> really isn't a big deal. >> Stephen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
