On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/11/11 8:40 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> On 11 April 2011 16:14, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The point of keeping a working Ant build is for users who want to
>>> build from source and are not Maven users (many, many users in the
>>> real world).
>> I don't believe there are many of those users. Most just pickup the jar
>> I oppose duplicate build systems at this point, even though I dislike maven.
>
> We can argue about this and speculate, but I have done the work to
> restore the Ant build for the 3.0 release and I would really like to
> give those users who want to be able to build a [lang] jar from
> source without downloading boatloads of irrelevant dependencies to
> be able to do that.  Are you opposed to that?   In other words, is
> this a -1 on my commit?  If so, I will revert it.

If there is someone prepared to maintain the ant build for a
component, then I think keep it.

Niall

> Phil
>> Note that Hibernate requires Gradle to build, so requiring maven
>> really isn't a big deal.
>> Stephen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to