On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 10/09/2014 11:43, Gilles a écrit : > > > This use case does not convince me at all: when working on a feature, > > you always do it locally (modifying code, preparing unit tests), and > > SVN certainly does not force you to experiment publicly; it's rather > > the project's policy that forbids you to commit crappy code. :-) > > The advantage here is that you can split you local work into smaller > commits before pushing them to the server. That makes the review easier > by clearly separating the various steps of the implementation. It's also > convenient to rollback some of the changes and correct them without > starting from scratch. > > Can you chose whether you retain the local commit history or not when pushing it to the server? Niall > > > [The advantages of "git" must be somewhere else.] > > Local commits should be one of them though, since it's on the SVN roadmap > :) > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3626 > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
