On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita <
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Hi Nial
> Do you know why your branch wasn't merged?
I dont really remember. I'm not sure whether all issues were resolved
(perhaps around tags doc generation). I sent the following email at the
start of 2010 - but I did some more work after that email:
* http://markmail.org/message/yveew57uparj3aab
I think the main reason though was that jelly was petty dormant and there
was no real interest.
Niall
> I've checked it out and a few tests are failing with Maven 3.2.5 and Java
> 7 & 8. But I'd like to use your branch, try to fix any failing tests and
> merge back onto trunk.
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-291 to track this
> issue.
> Thanks!Bruno
>
>
> From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> Cc: Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with Maven2/3,
> > having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions
> > (src/test/java and src/main/java etc).
> >
>
> I worked on a maven branch back in 2010 here:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jelly/branches/MAVEN-2-BRANCH
>
> Niall
>
>
>
>
>
> > I see that a start has been made, but it looks like there is some way to
> > go yet.
> >
> > On 10 May 2015 at 10:48, Bruno P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Paul
> > >> if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I was
> > > unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
> > > "standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
> > > context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
> > > Any kind of background on old issues is welcome! Before I start to work
> > on any issue,
> > > I'll triage old issues, try to find some low hanging fruits, and then
> > will start a one or two dayresearch on the mailing list to see if I can
> > learn as much as possible before coding.
> > >>I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly and
> > > I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning technology,
> > > that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the
> time
> > > I met them.
> > >
> > > I will work a little bit every weekend on triage issues, but will have
> a
> > one or two week cyclein the middle of June and in July (lovely weather
> for
> > coding; cold, cloudy, and raining a lot :)
> > >
> > >>Hope it helps.
> > >>I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better.
> > >
> > > It definitely helps. Very happy for having someone I can ask questions
> > about some old issuesin [jelly] :)
> > > ThanksBruno
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net>
> > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 8:33 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/05/15 10:22, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> > >> Since I joined Commons I've had a special interest in [jelly] due to
> > its importance in the Jenkins project.
> > >>
> > >> Jenkins uses a patched version of [jelly]. Kohsuke, creator of
> Jenkins,
> > is/was a Commons committer too, and submitted some issues. I intend to
> > investigate if that'd be doable fix the issues to a point that Jenkins
> can
> > drop the patched version, and [jelly] can be updated and released again.
> > >
> > > Hello Bruno,
> > >
> > > if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I was
> > > unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
> > > "standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
> > > context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
> > >
> > > Thus, I can only encourage you to go ahead. I think it would be nice to
> > > have both worlds working well with a single code base.
> > >
> > > I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly and
> > > I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning technology,
> > > that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the
> time
> > > I met them.
> > >
> > > Hope it helps.
> > > I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better.
> > >
> > > paul
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
