On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:39 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> We would take math through the incubator in order to build community around > it first. If we fail to do so, then we can decide its fate at that time. We > haven't done a good job attracting new people to math here at all. It has > always been maintained primarily by a select few. > It made sense to me when there were 6 committers working on Math, but I think given the exodus of most of those people to hipparchus then it would be better to wait a while for the dust to settle to see what happens with Math. I also don't think the incubator is a good place for starting a community from scratch (i.e. one or two man projects) - if you have a nucleus of at least a few people, then it has much better chance of success. So for me, I'm -1 unless there are enough Mathematicians who want to work on the code to give it a chance as an incubator project. Niall > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 1:36 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > -1 (binding) > > > > At least until there are enough people to have a viable PMC. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Jun 10, 2016, at 8:47 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Since it has been suggested that the previously passing vote should be > > > voided, I propose we vote again to move Commons Math to a TLP: > > > > > > +1 - Yes, move Commons Math to a TLP > > > -1 - No, do not move Commons Math to a TLP > > > > > > The vote will remain open for 72 hours. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > James Carman > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
