debian-installer-utils_1.152_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:46:29 +0100 Source: debian-installer-utils Architecture: source Version: 1.152 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System

Processing of debian-installer-utils_1.152_source.changes

debian-installer-utils_1.152_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_1.152.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.152.tar.xz debian-installer-utils_1.152_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#879106: marked as done (debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices)

Your message dated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 22:20:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#879106: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.152 has caused the Debian Bug report #879106, regarding debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices to be

Re: Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

Marc Haber writes: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:52:12PM +, josesanchez2782 wrote: >> Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. >> Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically >> overwrites all the bits in the drive in the secure

Re: Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

On 30/01/2025 at 21:28, Marc Haber wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:52:12PM +, josesanchez2782 wrote: Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically overwrites all the bits in the drive in

Re: Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:52:12PM +, josesanchez2782 wrote: > Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. > Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically > overwrites all the bits in the drive in the secure delete step before > enab

Add option in Debian installer to skip secure delete step

Hello, I would like to suggest a new option in the Debian GUI installer. Currently, when you enable full disk encryption with LUKS, it automatically overwrites all the bits in the drive in the secure delete step before enabling LUKS and installing Debian. Although this is more secure because it

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

> I wasn't doing anything especially weird (other than using Linux & > encryption), systemd-cryptsetup should be a dependency of cryptsetup > to make the OS work like it is designed to do. +1 And please note that the problem occurs not only when the user creates an encrypted swap partition manual

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 20:13:24 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: ... > > if I had a knowledge about d-i internals. :-< > > I think (I wanted but I'm not sure I did…) I said I would look into > this after Trixie Alpha 1, so if you don't mind waiting a little, > I'll look into it eventually… Thanks! I'm

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, Kentaro HAYASHI (2025-01-20): > > It seems that fixing gtk-set-font is not enough, need to reboot > > /sbin/debian-installer (or something), but it causes flickering > > (blackout) and > > need to re-process localechooser (select language again) > > It might be

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

X-Debbugs-Cc: k...@debian.org > It seems that fixing gtk-set-font is not enough, need to reboot > /sbin/debian-installer (or something), but it causes flickering > (blackout) and > need to re-process localechooser (select language again) > It might be annoying. > > How sh

Bug#1092978: marked as done (debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:37:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092978: fixed in partman-efi 108 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092978, regarding debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#969516: F2FS support in Debian installer

y boot from a SD card or USB stick. Even on PC, a portable installation on USB stick could come in handy. Also udeb packages providing F2FS kernel module and tools are available for the Debian installer and even included in installation ISO images, so I assume that adding F2FS support was

Bug#786428: marked as done (debian-installer: room for improvement for "non-free firmware" dialogs)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:07:00 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: #786428debian-installer: room for improvement for "non-free firmware" dialogs has caused the Debian Bug report #786428, regarding debian-installer: room for improvement for "non-free firmware

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:16:17 +0900 Kentaro HAYASHI wrote: > Hi, > > > > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 > > Updated to decompress font on demand. > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Hi, Andreas Tille wrote (Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:20:19 +0100): > > Also, if you would like to adapt the wording of the dialog, feel free to > > tell me. > > Please spell Blend in > "Choose a Debian _b_lend for installation > with upper case _B_ (its a noun). > > In the Blends selection I would s

Bug#1092977: debian-installer: systemd-cryptsetup package not installed on encrypted system

On 14/01/2025 at 02:51, Dave wrote: (Possible dupe of 1092968) Possible. I installed Debian testing from a live CD. During the installation process, I set up 2 encrypted partitions: - btrfs on LVM on LUKS for the root file system - swap on an encrypted partition with a random key (...) The

Bug#1092978: debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk

On 14/01/2025 at 04:04, Ted wrote: I installed Debian with "GNU/Linux trixie-DI-alpha1 _Trixie_ - Official Alpha amd64 NETINST with firmware 20241230-11:26" using the luks encrypted full disk partition scheme. It installed but the installer used an efi partition from another disk where there was

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 02:57:24 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Ted (2025-01-13): > > Any installed system with luks encryption support should be able to > > read and decrypt entries in /etc/crypttab with properly processed > > keyfiles without installing additional packages. > > I under

Bug#1092978: debian-installer: netinst installer uses efi partition from another disk

Package: debian-installer Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: veltf...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I installed Debian with "GNU/Linux trixie-DI-alpha1 _Trixie_ - Official Alpha

Bug#1092977: debian-installer: systemd-cryptsetup package not installed on encrypted system

Package: debian-installer Version: testing Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: therealmr...@duck.com Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? (Possible dupe of 1092968) I installed Debian testing from a live CD. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

Hi Ted, Ted (2025-01-13): > Any installed system with luks encryption support should be able to > read and decrypt entries in /etc/crypttab with properly processed > keyfiles without installing additional packages. I understand it might have been a little frustrating that it didn't work out of t

Bug#1092949: debian-installer could propose installing linux-image-cloud when run inside a VM

Hi Gioele, Gioele Barabucci (2025-01-13): > currently d-i installs `linux-image-$arch` regardless of the kind of > machine it is installed on. That's the general idea but that's not really what's actually happening (devil, details, etc.). > When used inside a virtual machine, it could make sens

Bug#1092968: debian-installer: LUKS encrypted installation does not use /etc/crypttab to decrypt other drives

Package: debian-installer Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: veltf...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I did a full-disk luks encrypted installation using trixie-DI-alpha1 _Trixie_

Bug#1092949: debian-installer could propose installing linux-image-cloud when run inside a VM

Package: debian-installer Version: 20241227 Dear debian-installer developers, currently d-i installs `linux-image-$arch` regardless of the kind of machine it is installed on. When used inside a virtual machine, it could make sense to ask the user if they want to install linux-image-cloud

Processed: Bug#1089010: debian-installer: arm64, armhf cdrom do not set the selected keyboard layout

Processing control commands: > found -1 20230607+deb12u9 Bug #1089010 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [debian-installer] debian-installer: armhf cdrom initrd.gz does not set the selected keyboard layout Marked as found in versions debian-installer/20230607+deb12u9. -- 1089010: ht

Bug#1089010: debian-installer: arm64, armhf cdrom do not set the selected keyboard layout

Control: found -1 20230607+deb12u9 Bug #1089010 in debian-installer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit

Bug#1034814: marked as done (debian-installer: bootable flag not toggling)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:26:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1034814: fixed in partman-base 232 has caused the Debian Bug report #1034814, regarding debian-installer: bootable flag not toggling to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 Updated to decompress font on demand. https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/59 Created MR to generate fake font cache in advance. https://salsa.debian.org/installe

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:45:44AM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >Hi Holger, > >On 31/12/2024 at 17:47, Holger Wansing wrote: >> > >> > I'd like to address special thanks to Holger Wansing who has done >> > a tremendous job wading through many proposed changes in various >> > installer components,

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

Hi Holger, On 31/12/2024 at 17:47, Holger Wansing wrote: I'd like to address special thanks to Holger Wansing who has done a tremendous job wading through many proposed changes in various installer components, in addition to coordinating translation efforts. Thanks for your warm words! I wou

Bug#879106: debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices

/dev/pmemXXX device. > > For example, > > # blkid > /dev/pmem0: UUID="2017-10-17-14-41-11-00" LABEL="ISOIMAGE" TYPE="iso9660" > > Currently, debian-installer will fail to find this block device, and > complain that the installer media cannot be fou

Blends added to Debian installer - please register your Blend

Hi all, Andreas Tille wrote (Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:20:19 +0100): > Hi Holger, > > Am Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 07:45:45PM +0100 schrieb Holger Wansing: > > We now reached the point, where all this can be seen/tested in the wild aka > > via daily built images. > > Please note, that the last relevant chan

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 12:44:45 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u9 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u9_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 12:44:45 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Hi Holger, Am Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 07:45:45PM +0100 schrieb Holger Wansing: > We now reached the point, where all this can be seen/tested in the wild aka > via daily built images. > Please note, that the last relevant change did not reach testing yet, so you > will have to install sid from a trix

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

need anymore) > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 Closed. replaced with MR!58 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/58 Created MR for fonts-motoya-l-cedar. https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-motoya-l-cedar/-/merge_requests/1 Regards,

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

also cause wrong ownership in produced artifacts. Anything build by `dh_builddeb` will be sanitized correctly, but as I recall `debian-installer` does an extra non-deb artifact, which might want some review for builds *without* this patch (it might leak the building users name/uid into tarballs

Processed: Re: Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1091668 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root Added tag(s) pending. -- 1091668: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091668 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

cause wrong ownership in produced artifacts. > Anything build by `dh_builddeb` will be sanitized correctly, but as I recall > `debian-installer` does an extra non-deb artifact, which might want some > review for builds *without* this patch (it might leak the building users > name/uid into t

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Cyril Brulebois: Hej Niels, Niels Thykier (2025-01-04): The transition has moved to the endgame and this bug is now RC. This bug is filed on the assumption that the remark in d/rules about a part of the code needing root is true. The provided patch (MR) explicitly has debian-installer opt-in

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Hej Niels, Niels Thykier (2025-01-04): > The transition has moved to the endgame and this bug is now RC. This bug is > filed on the assumption that the remark in d/rules about a part of the code > needing root is true. The provided patch (MR) explicitly has > debian-installer o

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 13:32:24 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net User: ni...@thykier.net Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue Hi, Filing this one to ensure it is on my bug radar for the MBF and for tracking status

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-29): > I've checked with 10pt MotoyaLCedar,VL Gothic and BIZ UDGothic. > > * MotoyaLCedar 9pt vs 10pt > 9pt: font typeface seems blurred, so it is a bit ugly. > 10pt: ugly blurred rendering was reduced. it has enough > readability and visibility as others. > > * VL

Processed: Bug#1091537 marked as pending in debian-installer

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1091537 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets Added tag(s) pending. -- 1091537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

on PC 3. do nothing for 30 seconds, then it will boot with screen reader 4. I have 2 audio cards, why it asks me to select one, but when i do this, it simply asks again. Best kind regards Kenneth Den 31.12.2024 kl. 17.10 skrev Cyril Brulebois: The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce

Re: Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

Hi Cyril, Am 31. Dezember 2024 17:10:43 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : >The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha >release of the installer for Debian 13 "Trixie". > > >Foreword > > >I'd like to address special thanks to Ho

Debian Installer Trixie Alpha 1 release

The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the first alpha release of the installer for Debian 13 "Trixie". Foreword I'd like to address special thanks to Holger Wansing who has done a tremendous job wading through many proposed changes in various installer

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227+rebuild1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 13:23:59 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20241227+rebuild1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

FYI: I've uploaded some screenshot images to check tweaked font name and default font size with rootskel-gtk outcome. https://people.debian.org/~kenhys/bug-1037256/

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 16:06:36 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-13

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

> > And should the font size stay the same for Japanese? > > I'll check tweaked version later. I've checked with 10pt MotoyaLCedar,VL Gothic and BIZ UDGothic. * MotoyaLCedar 9pt vs 10pt 9pt: font typeface seems blurred, so it is a bit ugly. 10pt: ugly blurred rendering was reduced. it has

Bug#1091668: debian-installer: Explicitly declare requirement for root

Package: debian-installer Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net User: ni...@thykier.net Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue Hi, Filing this one to ensure it is on my bug radar for the MBF and for tracking status. The patch is at https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

a.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 > > * > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 > > Oh, in that case I think we'll really want to look into some > compression thing, since BIZUDGothic-Regular.ttf

Bug#1091537: debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets

t now there are a bunch of things happening for the Trixie Alpha 1 > release. I might look into that once that's been published. I searched a bit and found a bug report [1] that looks like what we are running into, with exporting variables and using $(shell). Setting the variables with := makes `make list` fast again. So I've opened a merge request [2], hoping it makes sense. [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?64746 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/56/

Re: Bug#1091617: mdadm: broken debian-installer support

Control: tag -1 patch pending Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-28): > Spotted by Steve while testing tentative Trixie Alpha 1 images: mdadm is > broken, with a systemd-related problem. > > This part of the .config script doesn't seem to work: > > # if system has root on md > if findmnt / 2>/dev

Bug#1091617: mdadm: broken debian-installer support

Package: mdadm Version: 4.2-5 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Justification: breaks d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org [ X-D-Cc: -boot@ and -cd@ for awareness. ] Hi, Spotted by Steve while testing tentative Trixie Alpha 1 images: mdadm is broken, with a system

Re: Bug#1091617: mdadm: broken debian-installer support

Control: notfound -1 4.2-5 Control: found -1 4.2+20230508-3 Sorry, missed that edit before submitting. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227.tar.xz debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13-netboot

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-armhf is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-mips64el is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-ppc64el is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-riscv64 is NEW

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13-netboot-armhf_20241227_all.deb debian-installer-13

debian-installer-netboot-images_20241227_amd64.changes REJECTED

debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64_20241227_all.deb: trying to install to new, but could not find source (debian-installer-netboot-images 20241227) binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-amd64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-arm64 is NEW. binary:debian-installer-13-netboot-armhf is NEW

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:33:19 +0100 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28): > > Thanks, I didn't know that way yet. > > You're welcome! > > > Surely it seems better to do it there. > > Alright, I've built (many more but I'm only publishing) two mini.iso, > one called “prist

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hi, Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28): > I've tried to fix with following MRs: > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 > * > https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 > * https://salsa.debian.or

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

nstaller-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 * https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 Regards,

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-28): > Using motoyalcedar would mean an extra 2 MB in the initramfs, which > looks like a lot compared to 3 MB for fonts-android-udeb, so maybe it'd > be worth thinking a little more about this before submitting a udeb > addition to src:fonts-motoya-l-cedar and adding it t

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28): > Thanks, I didn't know that way yet. You're welcome! > Surely it seems better to do it there. Alright, I've built (many more but I'm only publishing) two mini.iso, one called “pristine” (without font-related changes) except it came with a +10 on the font size to h

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

> > Sorry, I think I was in the post-release cooldown and didn't follow up > at the time. If we wanted to change the font for a specific language, > that's something that's already supported with touching cdebconf. > > See src/usr/bin/gtk-set-font in the rootskel-gtk source package. Thanks, I di

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

Hello, Kentaro HAYASHI (2023-07-15): > FYI: I've updated a PoC patch. Mainly the explanation of patch was updated. > > 0001-frontend-avoid-han-unification-for-Japanese-take2.patch Sorry, I think I was in the post-release cooldown and didn't follow up at the time. If we wanted to change the font

Bug#1091537: debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets

Hi! Kentaro HAYASHI (2024-12-28): > * What led up to the situation? > > According to README [1], to know a list of available targets, > need to execute "make", but it takes huge amount of times. > > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > Follow

Bug#1091537: debian-installer: make takes huge amount of time to show targets

Source: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org, k...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? According to README [1], to know a list of available targets, need to execute "make", but it takes huge amount of times. * What e

Re: Slow 'daily-build' command (Was: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

latti and zelenka (there the build is very fast, but got bumped from 1-2 minutes to 10+), between the 22nd and the 23rd as well. TL;DR: Yes, this issue impacts regular d-i daily builds and wastes time on porterboxes every night, it'd nice to rewrite the make introspection soon-ish. As mention

Bug#1037186: marked as done (debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:04:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1037186: fixed in debian-installer 20241227 has caused the Debian Bug report #1037186, regarding debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1089010: marked as done (debian-installer: armhf cdrom initrd.gz does not set the selected keyboard layout)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:04:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1089010: fixed in debian-installer 20241227 has caused the Debian Bug report #1089010, regarding debian-installer: armhf cdrom initrd.gz does not set the selected keyboard layout to be marked as done. This

Bug#1037256: debian-installer: GUI font for Japanese was incorrectly rendered

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037256#20 Above Message #20 approach might be too ad-hoc, it might be better to investigate more generic alternative. just as PoC, it might be useful to apply custom style, but this is just an idea and not fully confirmed yet. >From 22ba16ddf1f7

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

Colin Watson (2024-12-25): > Oops, very sorry about that! The test that Gioele added for whether > debconf is installed looked correct, but on closer inspection I found > that cdebconf installs /usr/share/debconf/frontend as a symlink to > /usr/lib/cdebconf/debconf. (I'd like to remove that as I

Bug#1091366: Confusion about sid or trixie (Was: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

Roland Clobus (2024-12-25): > The daily installer image [4] is also based on sid, as the version > from the cdebconf-udebs shows. > > So: I'm confused about the desired content of the daily netinst image. > > If all is based on sid/unstable, then it is to be expected that > occasionally somethin

Bug#1091366: marked as done (debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

Your message dated Thu, 26 Dec 2024 00:05:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091366: fixed in debconf 1.5.89 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091366, regarding debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1091366: marked as done (debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Dec 2024 23:49:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091366: fixed in cdebconf 0.276 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091366, regarding debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 08:19:00PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > With cdebconf udebs reverted to their testing version (changing only that, > feeding them via localudebs after deb-reversion), the problem goes away. Oops, very sorry about that! The test that Gioele added for whether debconf is i

Bug#1091366: Confusion about sid or trixie (Was: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

Hi, On 25/12/2024 16:01, Holger Wansing wrote: An additional point: testing with an amd64 netinst image from 2024-12-25 10:15 the graphical mode is again broken, installer starts in text mode instead. I thought that the daily netinst image [1] is based on testing/trixie, not on sid (due to it

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

er fails to start, we get X > > > starting in a loop (see recent bug reports until the fix in the X > > > server), there's no fallback to text mode. > > > > > > Without any more information, that looks like some live problem… > > > > The live

Re: Slow 'daily-build' command (Was: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

Hi, Roland Clobus (2024-12-24): > On 24/12/2024 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Building with daily-build seems super slow for no obvious reasons, so I've > > just tried a regular `dpkg-buildpackage -b` instead, and I can replicate > > the issue with files below build/dest/cdrom/gtk after the b

Re: Slow 'daily-build' command (Was: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid)

Hello Cyril, list, On 24/12/2024 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Building with daily-build seems super slow for no obvious reasons, so I've just tried a regular `dpkg-buildpackage -b` instead, and I can replicate the issue with files below build/dest/cdrom/gtk after the build. I've seen this slo

Processed: Re: Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:cdebconf 0.275 Bug #1091366 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid Bug reassigned from package 'src:debian-installer' to 'src:cdebconf'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #109

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

Control: reassign -1 src:cdebconf 0.275 Control: severity -1 serious Roland Clobus (2024-12-24): > reassign 1091366 cdebconf 0.275 > severity 1091366 important > thanks It doesn't look like that's been (b)cc'd to control@, so let's try again. I'm also calling this a serious regression, esp. when

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

reassign 1091366 cdebconf 0.275 severity 1091366 important thanks On 24/12/2024 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote: With cdebconf udebs reverted to their testing version (changing only that, feeding them via localudebs after deb-reversion), the problem goes away. Paging Colin and Gioele accordingly.

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

r), there's no fallback to text mode. > > > > Without any more information, that looks like some live problem… > > The live installer runs 'daily-build' from the debian-installer > repository. The generated initrd.gz was then started with qemu: > > kvm -

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

started. With kind regards, Roland Clobus Note: The live images build the Debian installer from source. [1] https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&version=sid_xfce&build=20241224T021629Z_sid_xfce&groupid=14 [2] https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

ards, > Roland Clobus > > Note: The live images build the Debian installer from source. > > [1] > https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&version=sid_xfce&build=20241224T021629Z_sid_xfce&groupid=14 > [2] > https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distr

Bug#1091366: debian-installer: No graphical mode in sid

Source: debian-installer Severity: normal The daily live images started to fail to run the graphical installer with the build from 20241224T021629Z [1], whereas the builds from 20241223T201700Z [2] still worked. The X environment is no longer started. With kind regards, Roland Clobus Note

Processed: Bug#1037186 marked as pending in debian-installer

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1037186 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system Added tag(s) pending. -- 1037186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: Re: Bug#1090811: debian-installer: install linux-sysctl-defaults by default

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 general Bug #1090811 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: install linux-sysctl-defaults by default Bug reassigned from package 'src:debian-installer' to 'general'. No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/202409

Bug#1090811: debian-installer: install linux-sysctl-defaults by default

Control: reassign -1 general On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:24:49PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > The linux-sysctl-defaults provides a "sysctl configuration file setting some > > sensible defaults for Linux". Among other things, the settings provided by > > this package are needed in order to all

Bug#1090811: debian-installer: install linux-sysctl-defaults by default

Hi Noah, Noah Meyerhans (2024-12-19): > Source: debian-installer > Version: 20240914 > Severity: normal > > The linux-sysctl-defaults provides a "sysctl configuration file setting some > sensible defaults for Linux". Among other things, the settings provided by

Bug#1090811: debian-installer: install linux-sysctl-defaults by default

Source: debian-installer Version: 20240914 Severity: normal The linux-sysctl-defaults provides a "sysctl configuration file setting some sensible defaults for Linux". Among other things, the settings provided by this package are needed in order to allow unprivileged users to run

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Hi Holger, On Fr 13 Dez 2024 15:21:58 CET, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi all, Am 13. Dezember 2024 08:29:21 MEZ schrieb Andreas Tille : I confirm I was very happy about Holger's proposal and it might make sense to keep things as simple as possible for the moment. My gut feeling is that Debian Ed

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Andreas Tille writes: > Hi, > > I know Debian Edu members are reading the debian-blends list but to > be very sure I put their list in CC. > > Am Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:11:00AM +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: >> Philip Hands (2024-12-12): >> > I think I was perhaps forgetting that tasksel (and s

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >