On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 15:41:35 +0100 Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Kentaro HAYASHI <ken...@xdump.org> (2024-12-28): > > I've tried to fix with following MRs: > > > > * https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel-gtk/-/merge_requests/5 > > * > > https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-morisawa-bizud-gothic/-/merge_requests/1 > > * > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/55 > > Oh, in that case I think we'll really want to look into some > compression thing, since BIZUDGothic-Regular.ttf is even larger than > MotoyaLCedar (4.5M uncompressed, 2.4M compressed). > > Size aside, would BIZUDGothic look better than MotoyaLCedar?
If only font name was changed (default 9 point): * Readability and Visibility: * BIZ UDGothic > VL Gothic > MotoyaLCedar Greater is better, thus BIZ UDGothic is best in idealy. * Readability and Visibility with cosidering quality and disk usage balance) * VL Gothic > MotoyaLCedar > BIZ UDGothic Visibility is better than MotoyaLCedar, so VL Gothic is best. * Readability and Visibility with cosidering disk usage * MotoyaLCedar > VL Gothic > BIZ UDGothic less readability and visibility, but it is better than nothing and there is significant improvement current Han -Unification issue. After all, if disk/memory usage issue was resolved technically in somewhat, BIZ UDGothic is the best, but if it is difficult or there is some blocker, adopting MotoyaLCedar for a while is better compromise solution IMHO. > And should the font size stay the same for Japanese? I'll check tweaked version later. Regards,
