Hello, On 2024-12-28 13:51 +03:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi! > > Kentaro HAYASHI <ken...@xdump.org> (2024-12-28): >> * What led up to the situation? >> >> According to README [1], to know a list of available targets, >> need to execute "make", but it takes huge amount of times. >> >> * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or >> ineffective)? >> >> Follow instruction in README [2] in advance, then execute make. >> >> $ time make >> >> ...(omit list of available targets)... >> >> real 12m55.928s >> user 10m15.047s >> sys 2m44.828s >> >> (on 4vCPU, 16GB memory) >> >> d-i/installer revision: >> 9f06d60d3 sh4: Don't unversion the kernel as multiple flavors are >> supported >> >> * What was the outcome of this action? >> >> make returns a list of available targets (expected). >> It is expected and result is fine, but it is not expected that it >> takes over 10 minutes. >> >> * What outcome did you expect instead? >> >> make returns a list of available targets in less times. >> >> If I'm missing something prerequisite, feedback is welcome. > > Thanks for turning this known problem into an actual bug report, that's > been detected a few days ago, and I've sent my last reply to that thread > just a few hours ago. > > You can find more details here: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00154.html > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00161.html > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/12/msg00217.html > > Right now there are a bunch of things happening for the Trixie Alpha 1 > release. I might look into that once that's been published.
I searched a bit and found a bug report [1] that looks like what we are running into, with exporting variables and using $(shell). Setting the variables with := makes `make list` fast again. So I've opened a merge request [2], hoping it makes sense. [1] https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?64746 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/56/
