On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:33, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Gav... wrote:
>> I didn't really want to break up Buildbot pages and its well established
>> (2 years+) links to cater for another build system.
>>
>> It is possible to add /jenkins without breaking them
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Gav... wrote:
> I didn't really want to break up Buildbot pages and its well established
> (2 years+) links to cater for another build system.
>
> It is possible to add /jenkins without breaking them,
>
> I'll have a think about it some more, thanks
I was thi
> -Original Message-
> From: Tammo van Lessen [mailto:tvanles...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 8:35 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>
> On 04.02.2011 11:27, Gav... wrote:
> >> On 04.02.2
On 04.02.2011 11:27, Gav... wrote:
>> On 04.02.2011 00:46, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> We already have http://ci.apache.org/ that contains buildbot under
>>> http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html. I'd put Jenkins under
>>> http://ci.apache.org/jenkins/.
>>>
>>> Keeping the product name in the URL is IMHO
> -Original Message-
> From: Tammo van Lessen [mailto:tvanles...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 7:52 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>
> On 04.02.2011 00:46, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> > We alread
On 04.02.2011 00:46, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> We already have http://ci.apache.org/ that contains buildbot under
> http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html. I'd put Jenkins under
> http://ci.apache.org/jenkins/.
>
> Keeping the product name in the URL is IMHO quite OK, as we support
> multiple CI systems
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Just simple: builds.apache.org?
+1
/niklas
Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 9:35 AM
>> To: builds@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>>
>> OK, I'll expand. Based on all the reading I've done about trademark
>> law,
t;>>
>>>>> +1 for Jenkins
>>>>> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
>>>>>
>>>>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>
>>&g
ot;mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 20
gulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 9:35 AM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>
> OK, I'll expand. Based on all the reading I've done about trademark
> law, inside and outside of the ASF, I thin
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> +1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
We already have http://ci.apache.org/ that contains buildbot under
http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html. I'd put Jenkins under
http://ci.apache.org/jenkins/.
Keeping the product name in the URL is IMHO
Even if the trademark stuff is marginally relevant, having the redirect in
place actually lets us change the real name
sooner rather than later and thus be more cautious rather than less.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So I claim that the trademark business is not relev
bruary 2011 8:46 AM
>> To: builds@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>>
>> Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
>> 'trademark' into it.
>
> Excuse me? How did this sentence he
+1 for builds.a.o
2011/2/3 Ted Dunning :
> +1 for builds as the domain name.
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> +1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
>>
>
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
> -Original Message-
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 8:46 AM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>
> Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don'
as deprecated".
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
>> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februa
>>
> >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
> >>
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Fe
+1 for builds as the domain name.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> +1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
>
Hi,
> The Hudson domain name go, the Jenkins name will NOT appear in its place.
That's exactly my opinion, too.
> We need to learn and not use brand names as domain (sub) domains.
Jenkins is not a brand (currently) but it may get one. More important is:
why do we need the product name as part
thinking before I just pick one.
Gav...
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:darkar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 5:59 AM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>
> Not sure it's been
jenkins.ao
>>
>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated".
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
>>> A
n
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
> > An: builds@apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
> >
> > +1 f
+1 for Jenkins.
regards,
Giri
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
>
> Nige
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivie
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then which one
I don't care that much.
Nicolas
Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
>
> Nige
>
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> On Thu,
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
>>> the m
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
>> the most active is the Jenkins one)
>
> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has
> rel
ginal Message-
> From: Niklas Gustavsson [mailto:nik...@protocol7.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:39 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > * which code bra
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
> the most active is the Jenkins one)
Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has
released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not
reco
I'm in favor of Jenkins, and I think the rename would be wise to
reduce internal confusion.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm sure some of you followed this story :-).
>
> Two questions :
> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
> the
30 matches
Mail list logo
