Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag 'trademark' into it.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they > didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name. > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it >> doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain name, >> but there should be a grace period. >> >> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for >> everyone who cares .. :) >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming >> the >> > name as a trademark. >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apa...@materne.de> wrote: >> > >> >> +1 for Jenkins >> >> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao >> >> >> >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated". >> >> >> >> >> >> Jan >> >> >> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] >> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 >> >>> An: builds@apache.org >> >>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson >> >>> >> >>> +1 for jenkins >> >>> >> >>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then >> >>> which one I don't care that much. >> >>> >> >>> Nicolas >> >>> >> >>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : >> >>> >> >>>> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. >> >>>> >> >>>> Nige >> >>>> >> >>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson >> >>> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : >> >>> IMHO >> >>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has >> >>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not >> >>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with >> >>> our >> >>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone >> >>> objects, I >> >>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> +1 >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming >> >>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins >> >>> situation. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -Matthias >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> /niklas >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >> >>>>> >> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
