> -----Original Message----- > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 8:46 AM > To: builds@apache.org > Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson > > Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag > 'trademark' into it.
Excuse me? How did this sentence help the conversation? Gav... > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because > they > > didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name. > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that > it > >> doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain > name, > >> but there should be a grace period. > >> > >> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up > for > >> everyone who cares .. :) > >> > >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is > claiming > >> the > >> > name as a trademark. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apa...@materne.de> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> +1 for Jenkins > >> >> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao > >> >> > >> >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated". > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Jan > >> >> > >> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] > >> >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 > >> >>> An: builds@apache.org > >> >>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 for jenkins > >> >>> > >> >>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. > Then > >> >>> which one I don't care that much. > >> >>> > >> >>> Nicolas > >> >>> > >> >>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : > >> >>> > >> >>>> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Nige > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson > >> >>> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: > >> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy > <ol...@apache.org> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle > : > >> >>> IMHO > >> >>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. > Jenkins has > >> >>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves > not > >> >>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have > with > >> >>> our > >> >>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone > >> >>> objects, I > >> >>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> +1 > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to > jenkins.apache.org > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for > renaming > >> >>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins > >> >>> situation. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -Matthias > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> /niklas > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> -- > >> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >
