All, The Hudson domain name go, the Jenkins name will NOT appear in its place.
We need to learn and not use brand names as domain (sub) domains. So we need to think of a generic name, apply it real soon - within the next day or two, then redirect the old Hudson name for a few days. get thinking before I just pick one. Gav... > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:darkar...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 5:59 AM > To: builds@apache.org > Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson > > Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it > doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain name, > but there should be a grace period. > > Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for > everyone who cares .. :) > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is > claiming the > > name as a trademark. > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apa...@materne.de> > wrote: > > > >> +1 for Jenkins > >> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao > >> > >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated". > >> > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 > >>> An: builds@apache.org > >>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson > >>> > >>> +1 for jenkins > >>> > >>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. > Then > >>> which one I don't care that much. > >>> > >>> Nicolas > >>> > >>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : > >>> > >>>> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. > >>>> > >>>> Nige > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson > >>> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : > >>> IMHO > >>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins > has > >>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves > not > >>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with > >>> our > >>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone > >>> objects, I > >>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for > renaming > >>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins > >>> situation. > >>>>> > >>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? > >>>>> > >>>>> -Matthias > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /niklas > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>>>> > >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >>>> > >> > >> > >>
