Fair enough Paul, but that was a preference. They would not have been sued for trademark violations over the name java.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they > didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name. > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it >> doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain name, >> but there should be a grace period. >> >> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for >> everyone who cares .. :) >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming >> the >>> name as a trademark. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apa...@materne.de> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for Jenkins >>>> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao >>>> >>>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated". >>>> >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] >>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 >>>>> An: builds@apache.org >>>>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson >>>>> >>>>> +1 for jenkins >>>>> >>>>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then >>>>> which one I don't care that much. >>>>> >>>>> Nicolas >>>>> >>>>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nige >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson >>>>> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : >>>>> IMHO >>>>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has >>>>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not >>>>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with >>>>> our >>>>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone >>>>> objects, I >>>>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming >>>>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins >>>>> situation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /niklas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
