Totally agree. On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag > 'trademark' into it. > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >> Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they >> didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name. >> >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it >>> doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain name, >>> but there should be a grace period. >>> >>> Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for >>> everyone who cares .. :) >>> >>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming >>> the >>>> name as a trademark. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apa...@materne.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for Jenkins >>>>> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao >>>>> >>>>> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>>>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] >>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 >>>>>> An: builds@apache.org >>>>>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for jenkins >>>>>> >>>>>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then >>>>>> which one I don't care that much. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nicolas >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nige >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson >>>>>> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : >>>>>> IMHO >>>>>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has >>>>>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not >>>>>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with >>>>>> our >>>>>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone >>>>>> objects, I >>>>>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming >>>>>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins >>>>>> situation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /niklas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>
