Actually, the reason Apache chose the "jakarta" project is because they didn't want to use "java" in the subdomain name.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it > doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain name, > but there should be a grace period. > > Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for > everyone who cares .. :) > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming > the > > name as a trademark. > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne <apa...@materne.de> wrote: > > > >> +1 for Jenkins > >> +1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao > >> > >> And "mark hudson.a.o as deprecated". > >> > >> > >> Jan > >> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org] > >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21 > >>> An: builds@apache.org > >>> Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson > >>> > >>> +1 for jenkins > >>> > >>> for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then > >>> which one I don't care that much. > >>> > >>> Nicolas > >>> > >>> Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit : > >>> > >>>> +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. > >>>> > >>>> Nige > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson > >>> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : > >>> IMHO > >>>>>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has > >>>>>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not > >>>>>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with > >>> our > >>>>>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone > >>> objects, I > >>>>>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming > >>>>>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins > >>> situation. > >>>>> > >>>>> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? > >>>>> > >>>>> -Matthias > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /niklas > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>>>> > >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >>>> > >> > >> > >> >
