+1 for Jenkins. regards, Giri
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Nigel Daley wrote: > +1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect. > > Nige > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <nik...@protocol7.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> * which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO >>>> the most active is the Jenkins one) >>> >>> Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has >>> released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL slaves not >>> reconnecting correctly. This is a problem we currently have with our >>> Windows slave and that I would see fixed. So, unless anyone objects, I >>> will look into upgrading to Jenkins 1.396 in the near future. >> >> +1 >> >>> >>>> * do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org >>> >>> In my opinion, this has low priority. The major reason for renaming >>> would probably be to make a stand in the Hudson vs Jenkins situation. >> >> :-) why not a redirect from hudson.a.o to jenkins.a.o ? >> >> -Matthias >> >>> >>> /niklas >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
