Re: Negative BoundingBox values needed

Hi Josep, > I hereby attach simple.eps, a file that shows one > problem I came across recently. > With its original BoundingBox 0 0 96 64, the text it contains is shown cut. Does this work in other postscript viewers? I notice the one for my GMail also cuts off the box. Also does it work in ma

Re: Ghostcript bug with special pdf?

Dear Juan, > On 10 Feb 2022, at 22:43, Juan Nicolas Pardo Martin > wrote: > > I have this pdf that Chrome and Firefox can open no Problem but gs Fails with > this command The file you included is not a PDF file. It is an HTML file, so no surprise that a web browser can open it but gs cannot

Re: Ghostcript bug with special pdf?

Juan, You may want to try the ghostscript mailing list: gs-de...@ghostscript.com This "GNU ghostscript" email list is really only for a GPL fork of the normal AGPL ghostscript everyone knows and loves. This list is really only for items specific to the more permissive GPL only version of ghostsc

Re: Enable usage of epswrite again

41;344;0cOn Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:51:23PM -0500, Amit Verma wrote: Is it possible to have someone add epswrite back or clone and rename eps2write as epswrite. Just for compatibility in the master. I do not want to compile my own GS Yes. You can instruct anyone to do

Re: Enable usage of epswrite again

Thanks All We will not be able to change our applications as they are 3rdy parts we do not have code . Due to current vulnerabilities found by our audit team we have now to move from GS 9.14 to 9.Latest . But when we installed new GS its stated giving error Unknown device: "epswrite". Is it poss

Re: Enable usage of epswrite again

Here are the mailing lists for ghost script: https://ghostscript.com/mailman/listinfo/ This list is only for the GPL offshoot (vs AGPL mainstream) of ghost script which is kept at gnu.org. I don't believe this GPL version is in active development. Thanks, Robert E.

Re: Enable usage of epswrite again

Hi all, IMHO it is allowed, but it brings more responsibilities than the pros in most cases. The best course of action (if possible) would be to rewrite your code to use the new Ghostscript API. If that's not possible, contact Ghostscript developers, Ken Sharp and Chris Liddell, on IRC channel #g

Re: Enable usage of epswrite again

Hi Amit. > Hi Is there a way to download an open-source and change it to customize? We > need to download the Ghost script and try to rename one of the function > eps2write as epswrite (deprecated version) for our legacy programs to be > compatible with the newer version of ghost script In the m

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

I downloaded the file and asked vlc what's the resolution. I can still see the jaggies on the lines.That's probably all I know about your problem. Maybe by looking at two adjacent frames in PostScript, one could learn more. Bradley C Kuszmaul - via snartphone On Jan 23, 2018 4:53 PM, "Paul

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

Quicktime says it is 2000x1250 and that is indeed the frame PNG dimensions - perhaps you are viewing it in a browser which shows it to be smaller. in my browser it looks much smaller as well. Anyway, we are trying to quantify if indeed it is -/+1 pixel which makes sense in terms of rounding. I

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

This video is only 800x500, and the jitter's amplitude appears to be one pixel. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Paul Wessel wrote: > Seems resolution independent; I've tried up to 4K. Here is a 2000x1250 > MP4 movie, just showing the text HELL. It is especially noticeable for > angles 20-30. >

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

Seems resolution independent; I've tried up to 4K. Here is a 2000x1250 MP4 movie, just showing the text HELL. It is especially noticeable for angles 20-30. www.soest.hawaii.edu/pwessel/bug.mp4 > On Jan 23, 2018, at 5:59 AM, Bradley C. Kuszmaul

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

It looks like even the straight lines and circles have jaggies, and your jittering looks like it's just jaggies spread across the time domain. I don't think you can expect it to look good at such low resolution without taking a lot more care about anti-aliasing. Can you increase the resolution? B

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

Hi Mr. Wessel, Ghostscript is written by Artifex Software: https://artifex.com/ I believe they run a website here: https://ghostscript.com/ for the main Ghostscript product along with mailing list(s). This mailing list is for an old GNU copy of Ghostscript back when they went from regular GPL to

Re: Jittery text in successive PostScript sequences

Sorry, should probably state what our final gs command is. Here is one (building a tif): gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress -dDownsampleColorImages=false -dDownsampleGrayImages=false -dDownsampleMonoImages=false -dUseFlateCompression=true -dEmbedAllFonts=true -dSubsetFont

Re: ps2pdf : Unrecoverable error

Hi Vijay, The output of the command: gs --version would be helpful. If you're using a binary package (say redhat or debian package) it would be good to know which one with version. Also, this is only the mailing list for GNU's "GPL version" of ghostscript which is a fork. The Artifex mailin

Re: DoS found at ghost script

You may want to try gs-b...@ghostscript.com This list is specifically for the FSF "GPL" version of GhostScript. ghostscript.com and Artifex Software are the "main" providers of ghostscript. ​

Re: ghostscript vulnerabilities

Hi Didier, Didier Link skribis: > I've just released a gnu-ghostscript point release with the CVE patches > adapted by Mark (really thanks !!!). Thank you! > For the CVE-2016-7977 I've see that the file concerned was modified in > later release of gpl-ghostscript, I will see in later release o

Re: ghostscript vulnerabilities

Le 16/10/2016 à 17:47, Alex Vong a écrit : > Hello, > > I notice the patch for CVE-2016-7977[0] handles the problem differently > than GNU Ghostscript[1] does. Maybe you can take a look at it. > > [0]: > http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015

Re: ghostscript vulnerabilities

Hello, I notice the patch for CVE-2016-7977[0] handles the problem differently than GNU Ghostscript[1] does. Maybe you can take a look at it. [0]: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015ef70 [1]: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/ghostscript.

Re: ghostscript vulnerabilities

Hello all I will review the Mark's patches and apply them for a security release next week. Thanks for your help ! Best regards Didier Le 15/10/2016 à 09:36, Mark H Weaver a écrit : > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hello Didier and all, >> >> We are wondering about the applicabi

Re: ghostscript vulnerabilities

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello Didier and all, > > We are wondering about the applicability to GNU Ghostscript of the > recent vulnerabilities discovered in AGPL Ghostscript: > > Alex Vong skribis: > >> Salvatore Bonaccorso writes: >> >>> -

Re: ghostscript vulnerabilities

Hello Didier and all, We are wondering about the applicability to GNU Ghostscript of the recent vulnerabilities discovered in AGPL Ghostscript: Alex Vong skribis: > Salvatore Bonaccorso writes: > >> - >> Debian Security Ad

Re: Possible bug in 9+

This is the mailing list for the GNU version of ghostscript. The official Artifex Affero GPL release is available at ghostscript.com. The bugs list for the official Affero licensed version is: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/ Note: you'll probably need to provide a sample PS file exhibiting the prob

Re: Ghostscript duplicates curves from pdf files

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Le 19/12/2015 08:24, Ron Moreland a écrit : > To reproduce: 1) create a single curve in AI CS6, write as pdf ( or > eps ) file 2) use ghostscript to convert file to pdf, a simple pdf to > pdf convert 3) open converted file in AI. You see 2 curves, o

Re: Slow performance when raster a vignette (gs 9.16)

I just discover gs v9.18 have been release. Tested, the problem fixed.

Re: download

Just to add to a thought here. The source version will build fine under Windows if you tweak the build files, and even nominally work if you make a couple bug-fixes. However, I'm pretty sure there's no binary Windows distribution from gnu.org as Didier is saying.

Re: download

Le samedi 02 août 2014 à 08:24 +0200, Hennie Marais a écrit : > Downloaded Gs914w64 form Ghostscript but installation keeps failing – > integrity fails – damaged or incomplete media – where else can I get > the program from . I use Windows 7 64 bit. And what happened to the c > version of the prog

Re: GNU GPL (not AGPL) ghostscript 9.06 on windows doesn't build or run.

> The bug will be solved for the next release. When might that be? September 2014? Is this an outdated version? 01/01/2013 12:00AM 19,083,184 gnu-ghostscript-9.06.0.tar.bz2

Re: GNU GPL (not AGPL) ghostscript 9.06 on windows doesn't build or run.

Le jeudi 17 avril 2014 à 11:36 -0400, Bob Eby a écrit : > It's invoking undefined behavior in C. It causes debug assert in > Visual Studio 2010 running in debug mode. > > The "mem" parameter is missing, likely it was a copy paste-error from > the duplicate code in: eprintf_program_ident(). > > C

Re: GNU GPL (not AGPL) ghostscript 9.06 on windows doesn't build or run.

It's invoking undefined behavior in C. It causes debug assert in Visual Studio 2010 running in debug mode. The "mem" parameter is missing, likely it was a copy paste-error from the duplicate code in: eprintf_program_ident(). C:\Users\reby\Downloads\gnu-ghostscript-9.06.0_original>findstr -siprn

Re: GNU GPL (not AGPL) ghostscript 9.06 on windows doesn't build or run.

Le mercredi 16 avril 2014 à 13:00 -0400, Bob Eby a écrit : > You'd think it was the version.mak file, but you probably want to look > at this line of code first: > > epfm("%d.%02d.%d", (int)(revision_number / 1 % 100), > (int)(revision_number / 100 % 100), f

Re: [gs-devel] Building on Windows 7 64-bit.

On 08/04/14 15:27, Didier Link wrote: Le 08/04/2014 15:58, Bob Eby a écrit : Hi Everyone, Hi Bob, I've been testing with AGPL Ghostscript and thought I'd give the GNU GPL version a try. Unfortunately I'm having trouble building verison 9.06 successfully on Windows 7 64-bit. Why do you

Re: [gs-devel] Building on Windows 7 64-bit.

Le 08/04/2014 15:58, Bob Eby a écrit : > Hi Everyone, Hi Bob, > > I've been testing with AGPL Ghostscript and thought I'd give the GNU GPL > version a try. Unfortunately I'm having trouble building verison 9.06 > successfully on Windows 7 64-bit. Why do you use an old version of AGPL Ghosts

Re: GhostScript is converting dot to empty box on using DroidSansFallback

On Saturday, March 16, 2013 11:31:11 AM UTC+5:30, gaurav mathur wrote: > Hi, > > > GhostScript is converting dot to > empty box. > > > Please have attached PDF, on > bottom of Page 2 , there are two lines, staring with dot "." > > > GhostScript is converting dots to > empty box. > > > Pr

Re: Which rev of ghostscript for sunos 4.1.3

> > > The support of SunOS 4.1.3 seems to be available in gs-gnu-5.50a (read > > the Make.html file in the doc before) and after. The last version have > > always a notice about make gs in SunOS environment but they haven't > > tested this plateform. > > > > Maybe you can try the 5.50a ver

Re: Which rev of ghostscript for sunos 4.1.3

Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 06:07 -0800, jferg...@gmail.com a écrit : > I'm resurrecting a Sparc 10 using SunOS 4.1.3. suffice it to say that I have > a reason to stick with 4.1.3. Alas, i need NeWSprint to feed fonts to the > SPARCprinter. I no longer have the password to use the fonts I app

[PATCH 12/21] Minor re-ordering of configure.ac

* configure.ac: Move the test for enable_freetype closer to where it is used. --- configure.ac | 17 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 1a98f07..e22b86a 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -518,14 +518,6

Re: Cross-compilation fails for Ghostscript 09.05

On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 09:19:19AM +0100, Didier Link wrote: If you have some ideas to improve the cross compilation of GNU Ghostcript, I will review your patch with a great pleasure for inclusion in the next (coming soon) release ! Thanks to pointing this problems.

Re: Cross-compilation fails for Ghostscript 09.05

Le vendredi 03 janvier 2014 à 09:56 +0100, John Darrington a écrit : > During some test builds with the GUIX system, it became apparent that, > for a number of reasons, Ghostscript cannot be cross-compiled like other GNU > software. > > The main issue, is that much of configure.ac seems to be usi

Re: Possible bug report

more info : gswin32c.exe -sDEVICE#txtwrite -ozob.txt zob.ps OK gswin32c.exe -sDEVICE#txtwrite -ozob.txt zob.bite KO same inpute file of course. Regards, Ol 2013/4/20 LaserQuest Mataro > Hi, I'm a big fan of your product ! > works like a charm, but recenly, I found this: > the attached "zob.b

Re: Setting GS_LIB_DEFAULT and other paths on Windows

Hello All, I found the thread http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.printing.ghostscript.devel/3619 in which Chris Liddell artifex.com says: "configure/make is for Unix-like systems, not for Windows." I hope that he did not mean to say that it is unreasonable to expect to be able to build Ghostsc

Re: Setting GS_LIB_DEFAULT and other paths on Windows

In case anyone is interested in this, I have not solved it yet, but I now have more insight. I downloaded the official Windows binary and compared it with mine. According to strings, the correct internal representation on Windows is "Full-path1;Full-path2". The difference in display ( official

Re: 80 line limit in Windows 8?

Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 15:50 -0700, Don Lancaster a écrit : > > This program > > %!PS > 0 1 1000 {==} for > % EOF > > runs properly under Acrobat 9 but only returns the last 82 lines with > GhostScript under Windows 8. > > substituting { 30 string cvs print } for {==} does the same thi

Re: Running attached XPS file crashes gxps-9.06-win32.exe (case 2)

Le 18/10/2012 06:28, Peter Williams a écrit : > (Note: Windows_Vista_Product_Guide.xps is > freely downloadable Microsoft brochure.) > > > I ran this command line on Windows 7 > > gxps-9.06-win32.exe" -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r400 -sDEVICE=png16m > Windows_Vista_Product_Guide.xps > > The version info g

Re: build fails with libpng 1.5.12

Le lundi 03 septembre 2012 à 14:12 +0200, Didier LINK a écrit : > > > ./base/gdevpng.c: In function 'png_print_page': > > ./base/gdevpng.c:283:9: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > > > > Didier - any chance of a new GNU Ghostscript, in general? The latest > > Aladdin release is 9

Re: build fails with libpng 1.5.12

> ./base/gdevpng.c: In function 'png_print_page': > ./base/gdevpng.c:283:9: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > > Didier - any chance of a new GNU Ghostscript, in general? The latest > Aladdin release is 9.06. Perhaps it fixes the libpng stuff. > > Brandon - perhaps there is some cp

Re: build fails with libpng 1.5.12

./base/gdevpng.c: In function 'png_print_page': ./base/gdevpng.c:283:9: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type Didier - any chance of a new GNU Ghostscript, in general? The latest Aladdin release is 9.06. Perhaps it fixes the libpng stuff. Brandon - perhaps there is some cpp sy

Re: repository of ghostscript

Le 29/08/2012 09:52, Reimar Bauer a écrit : > Hi > > I try currently to track down an issue which I have in 9.0.5 and was > fixed in 9.0.6 > > Where is the repository of ghostscript located? > > Reimar > Hi Reimar, GNU Ghostscript is actually in 9.04.1 version, I think you want GPL Ghostscript fro

Re: how to compile "gstoraster"

Le lundi 20 février 2012 à 07:41 -0800, Adam_at_Prisma a écrit : > Hi, which flags should I give the configure script so the gstoraster.c > file is compiled into gstoraster? Hi Adam, You need to configure with "--enable-cups --with-install-cups" and "make cups" to compile gstoraster in bin/ Best

Re: 9.04.1: build issues

> Hello, Hello, > > Apologies if I am missing something evident. No problem ;) > > Just built 9.04.1 and found the following problems. > > 1. There is no local lcms[2] source (it is present in the GPL > distribution): maybe this has to do with license issues? > In the GNUification process I'

Re: Converting Simple PS Transparency to PDF Fails

Answering my own question, inserting this line solved the problem: >    { gsave >        [ /ca .5 /SetTransparencypdfmark .5 .setopacityalpha true .settextknockout Walt -~

Re: Converting Simple PS Transparency to PDF Fails

Answering my own question: http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/doc/AFPL/6.50/Language.htm#Transparency For some reason this was a bit difficult to find. I just needed to adjust the code: { gsave [ /ca .5 /SetTransparency pdfmark .5 .setopacityalpha true .settextknockout ...

Re: Making gnu-ghostscript-8.71.1 fails ion HP-UX11, macro expansion too big

You could try to install GNU make and to use it to build ghostscript. I will try this if I can find a prebuilt GNU make for HP-UX. Otherwise I will presumebly having the same "make problem" again. Not really. GNU make does not require make to be built. Just build it using t

RE: Making gnu-ghostscript-8.71.1 fails ion HP-UX11, macro expansion too big

Hello, And Thank You for the answer! About make: When running command make in gnu-ghostscript, makefile = base/ unixansi.mak it will not do anything but complaining: "Make macro expansion too big. Stop." Seems that there is something in that makefile exceeding

Re: Making gnu-ghostscript-8.71.1 fails ion HP-UX11, macro expansion too big

Hello. When running command make in gnu-ghostscript, makefile = base/ unixansi.mak it will not do anything but complaining: "Make macro expansion too big. Stop." Seems that there is something in that makefile exceeding the capabilities of your make program. Is the error message

Re: logging GS PDF to TIFF conversion process

Hello. Is there any way to log error messages that Ghostscript produces? I’m trying to convert multiple PDFs to TIFFs and I would like to keep a log of each conversion. You can try to redirect the output of the commands to some file. -- Jose E. Marchesijema...@gnu.org GNU P

Re: cannot read Polish gs9.00+gsview4.9 win32

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 12/12/2010 02:17, m_l_g3 a écrit : > ghostscript 9.00 + gsview4.9 win32 (XP) > > When I try to view a Polish pdf, I do not see the Polish letters, only > English ones. > To be more precise, the Polish letters are smaller than English ones > -- less

Re: GNU Ghostscript 9?

Le 07/11/2010 17:51, Markus Steinborn a écrit : > Nicolás Reynolds wrote: >>> have you any plans on releasing gnu ghostscript 9? >>> >>> (if i'm not completely wrong and you're following ghostscript >>> development) >>> > Please wait until GPL Ghostscript 9.0 (or 9.0.x) is usable. > > > Curre

Re: GNU Ghostscript 9?

Nicolás Reynolds wrote: have you any plans on releasing gnu ghostscript 9? (if i'm not completely wrong and you're following ghostscript development) Please wait until GPL Ghostscript 9.0 (or 9.0.x) is usable. Currently it * breaks GNU gv on some documents (broken by commit 11619 - cle

Re: 8.71.0: gs_lev2.ps tries to run non-existent gs_devpxl.ps

hi there, > > Can you try the new 8.71.1 release please ? > as far as I can say, 8.71.1 fixes everything. Thank you very much for your time ciao gabriele -- Gabriele Balducci - Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche - Via L. Giorgieri 1 I-34127 TRIESTE tel: I-040-5583957 fax: I-040-5583903 e-ma

Re: 8.71.0: gs_lev2.ps tries to run non-existent gs_devpxl.ps

> > hi there, > >> >> Can you try the new 8.71.1 release please ? >> > > as far as I can say, 8.71.1 fixes everything. > > > Thank you very much for your time > > ciao > gabriele Hi Gabriele, Very good news, thanks for your time to testing ghostscript. Regards. Didier

Re: 8.71.0: gs_lev2.ps tries to run non-existent gs_devpxl.ps

> > hi didier, > > thanks for the quick reply. > >> There is a duplicate of this file because of the cvs merge between GNU >> and GPL versions, sorry for that, the "lib" directory is a little bit >> populated with some old files. >> >> Can you try to remove the "lib/gs_lev2.ps" from your in

Re: 8.71.0: gs_lev2.ps tries to run non-existent gs_devpxl.ps

hi didier, thanks for the quick reply. > There is a duplicate of this file because of the cvs merge between GNU > and GPL versions, sorry for that, the "lib" directory is a little bit > populated with some old files. > > Can you try to remove the "lib/gs_lev2.ps" from your installation, the > g

Re: 8.71.0: gs_lev2.ps tries to run non-existent gs_devpxl.ps

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:23:14 +0200, gabriele balducci a écrit : > hello, Hello gabriele, > > Apologies if I am missing some blatant point. > > Just installed 8.71.0 and stumbled on what looks like a regression. > > Upon: > > ps2pdf foo.ps >

Re: Ghostscript 8.71.0 Regressions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 11/08/2010 20:05, Markus Steinborn a écrit : > Hi Didier, Hi Markus, > > it seems that GNU ghostscript should have the following regressions > (unverified, but confirmed upstream for GPL ghostscript). Thanks to > Moritz Muehlenhoff for linking t

Re: Ghostscript is vulnerable to CVE-2010-1628

> Hi Markus, > > The bug-ghostscript list was configured to be very picky about > attachments, so your second one didn't come through either. I just > changed the list config. If you haven't already just sent it to Didier, > please resend once more. Sorry. > > Didier, any ETA on a new GNU gs

Re: Ghostscript is vulnerable to CVE-2010-1628

Hi Markus, The bug-ghostscript list was configured to be very picky about attachments, so your second one didn't come through either. I just changed the list config. If you haven't already just sent it to Didier, please resend once more. Sorry. Didier, any ETA on a new GNU gs release? Thanks,

Re: Ghostscript is vulnerable to CVE-2010-1628

Markus Steinborn wrote: The attached patch (backported to Ghostscript 8.71 from upstream SVN by Redhat) should fix it. I did not get any patch in that mail, so once again... Thanks Markus Steinborn GNU gv maintainer

Re: gv 3.7.0 released (Security Fix) & Translators wanted

Hi, Didier LINK write: Hi, I see the point ... I will investigate before release (finally) a new GNU GPL V3 version of ghostscript. Thanks. Below an updated link list regarding this bug and related bugs in ghostscript: [7]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584653 [8]ht

Re: About code

I download a file of pdf and the pdf use GPL Ghostscript 8.15 When I copy and paste the content(chinese word), I want to use the file some word change something. Then the word only change the code. All I can tell you is that Ghostscript is not a PDF editor. I don't know what other so

Re: The ghostscript (with freetype support) can't render the embedded truetype font correctly.

Error Title: The ghostscript (with freetype support) can‘¡¯t render the embedded truetype font correctly. Thanks for the report, but this isn't something we changed to GNU Ghostscript. Your best shot is to report it at http://bugs.ghostscript.com and/or to the freetype project at http://f

Re: Problems with per-page orientation

> -dAutoRotatePages=/PageByPage That, and variations thereupon are what I've been trying. Sure looks right, but the output is not auto-rotated. =( Thanks, I'll check in with the other list. On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Hi Josh, > >http://pastebin.com/f148a6963 >

Re: Problems with per-page orientation

Hi Josh, http://pastebin.com/f148a6963 I don't know if it's a bug or feature, either :). We didn't change anything about tiffg3 in our "downstream" GNU Ghostscript, so I think your best shot is to report it at http://bugs.ghostscript.com. to switch back on the automatic orientation fixi

Re: ps2pdf and the right output size

Hi mr/mrs Anonymous, On 25 Aug 2009, at 20:16, bergenp...@comcast.net wrote: I've hacked up a script which gen's the PS, pulls out the pageboundingbox X and Y sizes out of the PS, and then passes these values to ps2pdf via the command line. This works ok but I'm wondering if there's a way to

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

> Artifex has incorporated the URW fonts directly in the Resources loaded > in memory by gs, I didn't know that. Thanks. > I've not included this fonts because I don't want to > have more included package in the executable than necessary. > > Any comments about this opti

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

Salut Didier, Sorry for the late reply. Didier Link writes: > 2008-08-12 23:44:53.919723 Ray Johnston > Remove 'Actual Fonts' references in the Fontmap that connected > the URW FontName to an 8.3 filename that we no longer use. > [Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS] Who is "we"? :-)

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

Hi Karl, k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes: > No, that is not correct, as you can see since I just received your email > via bug-ghostscript. What happens is that the first time a sending > address mails to bug-ghostscript (and virtually all other GNU lists), a > human has to look at it a

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

Le Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:03:00 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) a écrit : > Hello, > > With GNU Ghostscript 8.64, I noticed the following: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > $ gs user.ps > GNU Ghostscript 8.64 (2009-02-03) > Copyright (C) 2009 Artifex Soft

Re: Missing links to the URW+ fonts in 8.64's fontmap

Hi Ludo, PS: `bug-ghostscr...@gnu.org' seems to be swallowing emails without ever publishing them No, that is not correct, as you can see since I just received your email via bug-ghostscript. What happens is that the first time a sending address mails to bug-ghostscript (and virtually

Re: How to find out build configuration of my currently used Ghostscript executable?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Thu, 7 May 2009 04:33:42 -0700 (PDT), pipitas a écrit : > My apologies if there is a more appropriate place to ask beginner > questions like mine. If there is, please tell me. A lot has changed Hi, The only one answer for me : is your gs executa

Re: Problem with options -antialias/-noantialias

Hi Roland, Hi everybody, @Roland: Thanks for reporting this issue, there a bug somewhere, as the postscript file is displayed different using different viewers. @everybody: what do you think, is the following a bug in the postscript-file, the created PDF file or a bug in gv? BTW: The last p

Re: Problem with options -antialias/-noantialias

Hi Roland, Hi everybody, @Roland: Thanks for reporting this issue, there a bug somewhere, as the postscript file is displayed different using different viewers. @everybody: what do you think, is the following a bug in the postscript-file, the created PDF file or a bug in gv? BTW: The last p

Re: (no subject)

On 23 Sep 2008, at 17:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for someone who compiled a Program (with Gohstscript) that can convert PCL files to PDF files. I think you want GhostPCL, see http://www.artifex.com/downloads/ Regards, Wouter Bergmann Tiest

Re: split postscript files for printing booklets

Hi Zhang, On 15 Sep 2008, at 15:40, Zhang Weiwu wrote: So basically my question is: how to make a postscript file from original file, with the page number doubled and each page in original file was spitted vertically into two separate pages? pstops -pa4 '[EMAIL PROTECTED](0cm,29.7cm),[EMAI

Re: ghostscript: empty gnu software archive

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ghostscript/ is totally empty. Not for me. There are plenty of files there. As a wild guess, maybe your ftp configuration is unhappy; try http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ghostscript/ Best, Karl

Re: Error /typecheck in --run--

Here I was too fast to post, sorry. I also have the error typecheck in one PDF. Message see the post before. Greetings, Andreas Muschkat

Re: Invert colors with ghostscript

Nuno J. Silva wrote: I've been doing research on how to invert the colors of a document which is being viewed with gv (or any other ghostscript-based viewer). ATM, the only thing I found is a small trick which works with some files, not all (adding the command "{1 exch sub} settransfer" at t

Re: Learning materials

Elder, Michael wrote: Hi, Is there a website or list of materials you would suggest to learn ghostscript? Thanks, Mike Elder This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privile

Re: Bug in FontMatrix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:49:41 -0800 (PST), jdaw1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > This also posted on http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689664 > > Webmaster says ps2pdf.com is running 8.61 on Linux. Hi Julian, Thanks for the report ! It's a

Re: Bug in FontMatrix

This also posted on http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689664 Webmaster says ps2pdf.com is running 8.61 on Linux.

Re: gsv4.8 and gs8.54

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:27:10 +0200, Thomas Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi listers, Hi Thomas, > > I had to reinstall my Ghostview and Ghostscript... Beside the Problem > of downloading it (the ftp link for Ghostview/Win32 doesn't work) t

RE: Multi-Format Device Driver [Second Request]

s anything that might be considered if it were re-implemented today. In investigating Ghostscript, I understand its driver-based architecture and that it is feasible to implement a high-level, vector driver for this system. My original question was based on the additional understanding that

Re: Multi-Format Device Driver [Second Request]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:47:16 -0500, "Harper, Brad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Anyone? Is this even the appropriate group for this question? > > Thanks in advance for any response. > > Brad Hi Brad, Maybe this thread will interest you : http

Re: Problem "revision dowsn't match" with Ghostscript 8.60 and GSView 4.8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:59:17 +0200, gialloporpora <"sandrodll[NO_SPAM]"@messaggiami.net> a écrit : > Dear, Hi, > I have recentlly upgraded Ghostscript to version 8.60. I have > uninstalled Ghostscript, uninstalled §GSView and reinstalled > Ghostscr

Re: Compile problems with gnu-ghostscript-8.60.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:10:25 +0200, Mike Dowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hello shostscript developers, Hi Mike, thanks for the report ! > > I experienced a number of difficulties when trying to compile > gnu-ghostscript-8.60.0. Most of the

Re: gs 8.61 on linux (x86_64) compilation step "make so" fails

Hi Jean-Pierre, > Compilation from svn source > linux Suse 10.1 amd64(x86_64) > gcc 4.3 > normal compilation (./configure;make;make install) is OK You have compiled the GPL ghostscript from svn (from ghostscript.com) with gcc-4.3 (devel stage 2) and you post the result on GNU ghostscript list, v

Re: MuPDF rendering bug (clipping failure)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:03:37 -0400, Alan Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Where to report this bug? > > http://code.google.com/p/sumatrapdf/issues/detail?id=120 > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) wrote: > > I'm not sure how

Re: MuPDF rendering bug (clipping failure)

http://www.ghostscript.com/awki/MuPDF I see. I don't believe this project is related to GNU Ghostscript, though, which is just a repackaging (mostly to remove nonfree files) of the GPL Ghostscript from Aladdin. Admittedly it's all a less-than-obvious situation ... But I think that MuPDF

Re: MuPDF rendering bug (clipping failure)

> Where to report this bug? > http://code.google.com/p/sumatrapdf/issues/detail?id=120 On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) wrote: > I'm not sure how this got to Ghostscript, http://www.ghostscript.com/awki/MuPDF > but all I can suggest is using the sumatrapdf forums: > http://blo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >