Hello all I will review the Mark's patches and apply them for a security release next week.
Thanks for your help ! Best regards Didier Le 15/10/2016 à 09:36, Mark H Weaver a écrit : > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hello Didier and all, >> >> We are wondering about the applicability to GNU Ghostscript of the >> recent vulnerabilities discovered in AGPL Ghostscript: >> >> Alex Vong <alexvong1...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> Salvatore Bonaccorso <car...@debian.org> writes: >>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Debian Security Advisory DSA-3691-1 secur...@debian.org >>>> https://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso >>>> October 12, 2016 https://www.debian.org/security/faq >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Package : ghostscript >>>> CVE ID : CVE-2013-5653 CVE-2016-7976 CVE-2016-7977 CVE-2016-7978 >>>> CVE-2016-7979 CVE-2016-8602 >>>> Debian Bug : 839118 839260 839841 839845 839846 840451 >>>> >>>> Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Ghostscript, the GPL >>>> PostScript/PDF interpreter, which may lead to the execution of arbitrary >>>> code or information disclosure if a specially crafted Postscript file is >>>> processed. >> [...] >> >>> I've checked just now. GNU Ghostscript is also affected at least by >>> CVE-2016-8602. Looking at the patch in this bug report[0] and the >>> source[1], one can see that the vulnerable lines are present in GNU >>> Ghostscript. What should we do now? >>> >>> [0]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840451 >>> [1]: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/ghostscript.git/tree/psi/zht2.c >> WDYT? Perhaps a new release incorporating the fixes is in order? > FYI, I ported the upstream patches to GNU ghostscript for GNU Guix. > You can find them here: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=1de17a648fa631f0074d315bfff0716220ce4880 > > Mark
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
