On Tuesday, February 4, 2014, David Nyman <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 4 February 2014 11:46, Stathis Papaioannou 
> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> > wrote:
>
> > Why? You agree that there is still one way causal link. That is
>> > consciousness is a necessary side, and real, effect of the brain
>> activity.
>> > So why a body could not refer to it meaningfully?
>>
>> It's not that which would be meaningless: it would be meaningless to
>> ask how a body could refer to an epiphenomenon, David's initial
>> question.
>
>
> It is not yet clear to me why you consider such a question meaningless. I
> thought we had established that you really meant to say that consciousness
> could be regarded as an emergent phenomenon, like temperature. Temperature
> can be measured (i.e. detected) quite straightforwardly by reference to
> some physical variable, such as the change in the height of a column of
> mercury. Hence if consciousness is some such phenomenon we should in
> principle be able to measure and detect it extrinsically in an analogous
> way. Are you suggesting then that we are able to refer to our own emergent
> conscious phenomena because our bodies, in effect, are monitoring some such
> physical variable?
>
> David
>

We can refer to our conscious states because the base phenomena on which
our conscious states supervene cause our vocal cords to move in a
particular way. But it is wrong to say, except in a loose way of speaking,
that our conscious states cause our vocal cords to move. The supervenient
phenomenon follows in a straightforward way (by virtue of being
supervenient) without the need for downward causation.

-- 
Stathis Papaioannou

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to