dev-platform  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Bobby Holley
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Joel Maher
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Botond Ballo
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Joel Maher
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Gijs Kruitbosch
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Daniel Veditz
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Gijs Kruitbosch
  • Re: Lack of browser mochitests in non-e10s configuration and support for turning off e10s on desktop going forward Cameron McCormack
• Intent to unship: XMLDocument.load and XMLDocument.async APIs Ehsan Akhgari
• Implementing a new tracking blocking mechanism using a separate nsIPrincipal for cookie jar access: StoragePrincipal Andrea Marchesini
  • Re: Implementing a new tracking blocking mechanism using a separate nsIPrincipal for cookie jar access: StoragePrincipal Tom Ritter
  • Re: Implementing a new tracking blocking mechanism using a separate nsIPrincipal for cookie jar access: StoragePrincipal Ehsan Akhgari
• Patching FF 52.9esr with v60+ Security updates possible? Charles Robertson
  • Re: Patching FF 52.9esr with v60+ Security updates possible? Masayuki Nakano
  • Re: Patching FF 52.9esr with v60+ Security updates possible? Axel Hecht
  • Re: Patching FF 52.9esr with v60+ Security updates possible? Frederik Braun
• Please advise how run testing\xpcshell\selftest.py locally (on Windows) Honza Bambas
  • Re: [SOLVED] Please advise how run testing\xpcshell\selftest.py locally (on Windows) Honza Bambas
• Automatically including add_task into SimpleTest.js Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Automatically including add_task into SimpleTest.js Brian Grinstead
• PSA: web-platform-tests (dashboard | fuzzy-reftests | reftest comparisons) James Graham
  • Re: PSA: web-platform-tests (dashboard | fuzzy-reftests | reftest comparisons) Jonathan Watt
  • Re: PSA: web-platform-tests (dashboard | fuzzy-reftests | reftest comparisons) Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: PSA: web-platform-tests (dashboard | fuzzy-reftests | reftest comparisons) James Graham
• Core : Spell checker ownership Jim Mathies
  • Re: Core : Spell checker ownership Masayuki Nakano
  • Re: Core : Spell checker ownership Makoto Kato
  • Re: Core : Spell checker ownership Jörg Knobloch
• Announcing ./mach busted Bobby Holley
  • Re: Announcing ./mach busted Mike Conley
  • Re: Announcing ./mach busted Dave Townsend
  • Re: Announcing ./mach busted Randell Jesup
  • Re: Announcing ./mach busted Mike Hommey
• Intent to implement and ship: add `preventScroll` option to HTMLElement's, SVGElement's and XULElement's `focus` method Mirko Brodesser
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: add `preventScroll` option to HTMLElement's, SVGElement's and XULElement's `focus` method sime . vidas
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: add `preventScroll` option to HTMLElement's, SVGElement's and XULElement's `focus` method Makoto Kato
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: add `preventScroll` option to HTMLElement's, SVGElement's and XULElement's `focus` method mbrodesser
• Intent to implement: Delegated Credentials for TLS 1.3 Thyla van der Merwe
• PSA: Bot automatically assigning components to Untriaged (and some General) bugs Marco Castelluccio
• Intent to remove "-e10s" from treeherder group symbols and task labels Andrew Halberstadt
  • Re: Intent to remove "-e10s" from treeherder group symbols and task labels Sylvestre Ledru
  • Re: Intent to remove "-e10s" from treeherder group symbols and task labels Andrew Halberstadt
  • Re: Intent to remove "-e10s" from treeherder group symbols and task labels Jonathan Kew
  • Re: Intent to remove "-e10s" from treeherder group symbols and task labels Andrew Halberstadt
  • Re: Intent to remove "-e10s" from treeherder group symbols and task labels Andrew Halberstadt
• Danger: `hg rebase` with format-source seems to be eating patches Jason Orendorff
• PSA: NSMODULE_DEFN is no more Mike Hommey
• Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Cameron McCormack
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Cameron McCormack
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central James Graham
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Gijs Kruitbosch
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Gijs Kruitbosch
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Boris Zbarsky
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central jj
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Felipe G
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Kartikaya Gupta
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Kartikaya Gupta
  • Re: Proposal to remove unnecessary [type] attributes on script tags in mozilla-central Brian Grinstead
• [IMPORTANT] Please send feature technical documents for Firefox 68 by April 12 Tania Maity
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Please send feature technical documents for Firefox 68 by April 12 Tania Maity
• Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group L. David Baron
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group Henri Sivonen
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group L. David Baron
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Internationalization (i18n) Working Group and Interest Group Henri Sivonen
• Proposed W3C Charter: Media Working Group L. David Baron
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Media Working Group Joseph Lorenzo Hall
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Media Working Group Daniel Veditz
• Proposed W3C Charter: Web & Networks Interest Group L. David Baron
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web & Networks Interest Group Henri Sivonen
  • Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web & Networks Interest Group Dragana Damjanovic
• crash reporting, inline functions, and you Nathan Froyd
  • Re: crash reporting, inline functions, and you Bobby Holley
  • Re: crash reporting, inline functions, and you Calixte Denizet
  • Re: crash reporting, inline functions, and you Kartikaya Gupta
  • Re: crash reporting, inline functions, and you Nicholas Nethercote
• Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 jmaher
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Boris Zbarsky
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Kartikaya Gupta
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Boris Zbarsky
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Kartikaya Gupta
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Jed Davis
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Bobby Holley
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Joel Maher
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Gian-Carlo Pascutto
  • Re[2]: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 mhoye
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Henri Sivonen
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 William Lachance
  • Re: Intent to deprecate - linux32 tests starting with Firefox 69 Joel Maher
• git-cinnabar users, please read Mike Hommey
  • Re: git-cinnabar users, please read Yaron Tausky
  • Re: git-cinnabar users, please read Mike Hommey
• Stop including nsIPresShell.h, include mozilla/PresShell.h instead Masayuki Nakano
• Update to "Are We Triaged Yet" for Bug Types Emma Humphries
• To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Emilio Cobos Álvarez
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Bobby Holley
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Emilio Cobos Álvarez
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Nicholas Alexander
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Chris M.
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Frederik Braun
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Kim Moir
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Jeff Muizelaar
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Miko Mynttinen
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Chris M.
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Jonathan Watt
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Christopher Manchester
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Marcos Caceres
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Jeff Gilbert
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Marcos Caceres
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Jeff Gilbert
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Emilio Cobos Álvarez
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Marcos Caceres
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? smaug
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Gerald Squelart
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Simon Sapin
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Marcos Caceres
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Steve Fink
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Marcos Caceres
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Jeff Muizelaar
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Marcos Caceres
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Nicholas Alexander
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Reuben Morais
  • Re: To what extent is sccache's distributed compilation usable? Gabriele Svelto
• Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Jared Hirsch
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Felipe G
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Honza Bambas
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Boris Zbarsky
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Steve Fink
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests James Graham
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests James Graham
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests Brian Grinstead
  • Re: Creating a new mach command for adding tests James Graham
• Intent to unship: CSP “require-sri-for” Support Sebastian Streich
• SVG text coordinate systems Alex Henrie
  • Re: SVG text coordinate systems Cameron McCormack
• MOZ_DBG Cameron McCormack
  • Re: MOZ_DBG Dave Townsend
  • Re: MOZ_DBG Dave Townsend
• nsresult code lookup via IRC (mrgiggles bot) Steve Fink
  • Re: nsresult code lookup via IRC (mrgiggles bot) Kris Maglione
• Intent-to-Unship: DH algorithm support for WebCrypto J.C. Jones
• PSA: .eslintrc.js files are no longer needed in test directories (in most cases) Mark Banner
• Intent to Unship: -moz-block-height value for line-height Emilio Cobos Álvarez
• Shippable Builds Incoming... Justin Wood
  • Re: Shippable Builds Incoming... Kartikaya Gupta
  • Re: Shippable Builds Incoming... Justin Wood
  • Re: Shippable Builds Incoming... William Lachance
• [ANN] In-tree helper crates for Rust XPCOM components Lina Cambridge
  • Re: [ANN] In-tree helper crates for Rust XPCOM components Joshua Cranmer 🐧
• Re: sccache as ccache Jonathan Watt
• hg/git hooks for clang-format Sylvestre Ledru
• How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped? violet . bugreport
  • Re: How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped? Boris Zbarsky
  • Re: How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped? violet . bugreport
  • Re: How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped? Boris Zbarsky
  • Re: How to reliably make an ArrayBufferView wrapped? violet . bugreport
• Intent to implement and ship: CSS ::marker pseudo-element Mats Palmgren
• Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Mats Palmgren
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Domenic Denicola
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Domenic Denicola
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Emilio Cobos Álvarez
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' L. David Baron
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Domenic Denicola
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' L. David Baron
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' jackalmage
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Mats Palmgren
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Domenic Denicola
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' Mats Palmgren
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' L. David Baron
  • Re: Intent to implement and ship: built-in CSS counter 'list-item' fantasai
• Intent to implement and ship: CSS counter-set property Mats Palmgren
• [IMPORTANT] Submit your PI Requests for Firefox 68 QA feature testing by March 29 Tom Grabowski
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Submit your PI Requests for Firefox 68 QA feature testing by March 29 Tom Grabowski
• Building dav1d 0.2.1 - nasm error gangadharanee
  • Re: Building dav1d 0.2.1 - nasm error Gabriele Svelto
  • Re: Building dav1d 0.2.1 - nasm error Mike Hommey
• Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking Steven Englehardt
  • Re: Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking Rik Cabanier
  • Re: Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking Ehsan Akhgari
  • Re: Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking Rik Cabanier
  • Re: Intent to implement: cryptomining and fingerprinting resource blocking Ehsan Akhgari
• Intent to ship: URL classifier classification by default Dimi Lee
• Proposed W3C Charter: Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group L. David Baron
• Intent to implement and experiment: Require user interaction for notification permission prompts Johann Hofmann
  • Re: Intent to implement and experiment: Require user interaction for notification permission prompts Johann Hofmann
  • Re: Intent to implement and experiment: Require user interaction for notification permission prompts Henri Sivonen
  • Re: Intent to implement and experiment: Require user interaction for notification permission prompts Johann Hofmann
• android-em-4-3-armv7-api16 possibly falsy timeout violet . bugreport
  • Re: android-em-4-3-armv7-api16 possibly falsy timeout Jason Orendorff

• Earlier messages
• Later messages