On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:45 AM Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On 4/5/19 10:20 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: > > If we can drop that then we can remove a bunch of complexity > > and code paths. > > Are we talking about just dropping linux32 _tests_, or dropping linux32 > _support_?
Tests. > Because if we're keeping support, and linux32 is the only non-APZ > confiration, linux32 itself ships with e10s and APZ enabled like all our other desktop platforms. the linux32 _tests_ also exercise non-e10s codepaths (mostly to help out fennec), as Joel said in his original email. But Fennec itself has APZ enabled even though it doesn't have e10s. So from an APZ point of view those tests are not testing anything useful. Dropping these tests is not a blocker for dropping the non-APZ codepaths but it just makes it easier since we don't have to figure out what to do with the tests that might break as a result. kats _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
