debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• Re: Re: Urgent: Mirroring of encryption software in the USA Orange Lofton
• Unsere lösung für die kommenden tage 4u2move - Zusammenklappbares E-Bike
• MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Fab Stz
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? David Given
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Fab Stz
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? David Given
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Paul Wise
• Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Andreas Tille
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Philip Hands
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Francesco Poli
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Russ Allbery
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Stephan Lachnit
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Maxime Chambonnet
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Russ Allbery
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Jonathan Carter
  • Legal advice regarding the NEW queue Stephan Lachnit
  • Re: Legal advice regarding the NEW queue Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Jonathan Carter
• Bug#1004341: mercurial-common: please add contrib/zsh_completion to d/copyright Daniel Shahaf
• GihHub style logo license Yadd
  • Re: GihHub style logo license Jérémy Lal
  • Re: GihHub style logo license Yadd
• Question about Debian redistribution Navtej Bhatti
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Walter Landry
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Paul Wise
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Navtej Bhatti
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Paul Wise
• Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Jan Gru
  • Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Jan Gru
  • Re: Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Andrew M.A. Cater
• Re: Bug#1001894: ITP: spacecadetpinball -- Decompilation and port of "3D Pinball for Windows - Space Cadet" lucylikesyourface
• Remittance Advice - Debian-legal Account Payable
• We are the factory of cue product from China #gqS7PpVr # caleb
• Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Nicholas Guriev
  • Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Walter Landry
  • Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Nicholas Guriev
  • Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Paul Wise
• Export Compliance/Customs Information about Debian Software . Cubik65536
  • Re: Export Compliance/Customs Information about Debian Software Walter Landry
• Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Benito Garcia
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Daniel Hakimi
• MLCC & IC &Transistors & Diodes from CN Tina Tang
• Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Dominik George
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Francesco Poli
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Paul Wise
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Walter Landry
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Daniel Leidert
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments John Scott
• Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Peter Ehlert
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Tom Dial
• Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Dhavan V
  • Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Protesilaos Stavrou
  • Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Paul Wise
  • Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Dhavan V
• I need help my acct was hacked Scarlett Kelley
  • Re: I need help my acct was hacked Andrew M.A. Cater
• List of journal Bastien ROUCARIES
  • Re: List of journal Walter Landry
• Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Andreas Tille
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Andreas Tille
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Ole Tange
• Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian Jeffrey H. Johnson
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian J.B. Nicholson
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian Walter Landry
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian J.B. Nicholson
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian Francesco Poli
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian Jeffrey H. Johnson
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian Tobias Frost
  • Re: Acceptability of a documentation license for Debian Francesco Poli
• Concern about a Sun license Pierre Gruet
  • Re: Concern about a Sun license Francesco Poli
  • Re: Concern about a Sun license Pierre Gruet
  • Re: Concern about a Sun license Walter Landry
• "Andronix" app reselling paid version of Debian, potentially violating GPL and Debian trademarks? Rishub
• Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0 Guilherme Xavier
  • Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0 Walter Landry
  • Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0 Francesco Poli
  • Re: Dúvida sobre licenciamento CRM Public License Version 1.0 Francesco Poli
• cowsay questionable files Bone Baboon
  • Re: cowsay questionable files Bone Baboon
• Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye jorkanofaln
  • Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye Paul Wise
  • Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye Bone Baboon
  • Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye Sam Hartman
  • Re: Legal status of Audacity in releases newer than Bullseye Mihai Moldovan
• MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD? Marc Haber
  • Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD? Sam Hartman
  • Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD? Francesco Poli
  • Re: MIT Licensed code in LD_PRELOAD? Ole Streicher
• Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Diego M. Rodriguez
  • Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Sam Hartman
  • Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Diego M. Rodriguez
  • Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Paul Wise
  • Re: Declaring license for autogenerated file (W3C) Diego M. Rodriguez
• Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding Bastian Germann
  • Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding Walter Landry
  • Re: Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding Sam Hartman
• Rust trademark policy Bone Baboon
  • Re: Rust trademark policy Walter Landry
  • Re: Rust trademark policy Bone Baboon
  • Re: Rust trademark policy Bone Baboon
  • Re: Rust trademark policy Bone Baboon
  • Re: Rust trademark policy Bone Baboon
• DATAS PROTECTION AND FRAMEWORK SUPPORT HEYJEY789
• GPL and embedded software in a custom ISO Sileno de Oliveira Brito
• Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct? Alexander Mazuruk
  • Re: Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct? Sam Hartman
  • Re: Copyright notice gives info on source files, not the packaged binaries -is that correct? Paul Wise
• Debian-legal, Nice to know that you do camera business. #JllvJFSW # kevin
• New Year Greetings! Cherry
• LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) = (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+)? Andreas Metzler
  • Re: LGPLv2+ depending on (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+) = (LGPLv3+ or GPLv2+)? Walter Landry
• Debian-legal, look forward to our cooperation! 02/04/2021 12:03:34 jfnvqmgr zhenli
• COUROMODA 2021 - Attendees List mary smith
• I am a link builder & I've a good number of quality sites Jack Charlie
• gnome-screensaver copyright issues Dennis Filder
  • Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues Bastian Blank
  • Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues Dennis Filder
• License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package Marc Haber
  • Re: License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package Francesco Poli
• Geant4 license (again). Stephan Lachnit
• Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Paul Wise
• Re: Bug#979095: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Ritesh Raj Sarraf
• Copyright of debian/* Matthew Vernon
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* John Scott
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* Christoph Biedl
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* David Prévot
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* Matthew Vernon
• GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Bastian Germann
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Simon McVittie
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Jim Wright
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline John Scott
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Francesco Poli
• Looking for a Minecraft Server? PUSCraft
• do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL? Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL? Florian Weimer
• Re: Haftungsausschluss Geert Stappers
• CC logos Markus Demleitner
• Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED calumlikesapplepie
  • Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED Walter Landry
  • Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED calumlikesapplepie
• breach Deana Gadola
• Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Rogério Brito
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Hayden Barnes
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Hayden Barnes
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Dominik George
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Roberto
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Craig Small
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Daniel Leidert
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Philip Hands
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Steve Cotton
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Domenico Andreoli
• Stratégie de développement 2021 Paweł Skorzyński
• License of "debian/" directories Joel Ray Holveck
  • Re: License of "debian/" directories Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: License of "debian/" directories Hong Xu
• Help apple iPhones April Hayes
• tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Tobias Frost
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Tobias Frost
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon

• Earlier messages
• Later messages