debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• COUROMODA 2021 - Attendees List mary smith
• I am a link builder & I've a good number of quality sites Jack Charlie
• gnome-screensaver copyright issues Dennis Filder
  • Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues Bastian Blank
  • Re: gnome-screensaver copyright issues Dennis Filder
• License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package Marc Haber
  • Re: License and Copyright info for debconf translation of aide package Francesco Poli
• Geant4 license (again). Stephan Lachnit
• Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
  • Re: Bug#979101: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Paul Wise
• Re: Bug#979095: Legally problematic GPL-3+ readline dependency Ritesh Raj Sarraf
• Copyright of debian/* Matthew Vernon
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* John Scott
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* Christoph Biedl
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* David Prévot
  • Re: Copyright of debian/* Matthew Vernon
• GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Bastian Germann
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Simon McVittie
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Jim Wright
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline John Scott
  • Re: GPL-2-only packages using GPL-3+ readline Francesco Poli
• Looking for a Minecraft Server? PUSCraft
• do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL? Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: do SPDX declaration fulfill §17 of GPL? Florian Weimer
• Re: Haftungsausschluss Geert Stappers
• CC logos Markus Demleitner
• Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED calumlikesapplepie
  • Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED Walter Landry
  • Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: whitakers-words_0.2020.10.27-1_multi.changes REJECTED calumlikesapplepie
• breach Deana Gadola
• Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Rogério Brito
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Hayden Barnes
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Hayden Barnes
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Dominik George
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Roberto
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Craig Small
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Daniel Leidert
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Philip Hands
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Steve Cotton
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa? Domenico Andreoli
• Stratégie de développement 2021 Paweł Skorzyński
• License of "debian/" directories Joel Ray Holveck
  • Re: License of "debian/" directories Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: License of "debian/" directories Hong Xu
• Help apple iPhones April Hayes
• tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Tobias Frost
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Tobias Frost
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Tobias Frost
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Tobias Frost
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. Paul Wise
  • Re: tomboy-ng package with non standard license. David Bannon
• MCC : O/F export from China to Manila coco
• Disinfection Liam Brown
• Richiesta Contatto Maria Puccini
• Disinfectant Liam Brown
  • Disinfectant Ethan Smith
• Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Florian Weimer
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Giovanni Mascellani
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work Adrian Bunk
• Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter Van Handel, Michael
  • Re: Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter vheu...@heuserlawoffice.com
  • Re: Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Subpoena regarding ongoing patent matter Jonathan Carter
• Legal assistance needed urgently! P.T. Jvckenwood Indonesia
• Is this BSD-3-Clause Variant DFSG-compliant? Eriberto Mota
  • Re: Is this BSD-3-Clause Variant DFSG-compliant? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Is this BSD-3-Clause Variant DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
• Re: RE: Recordatorio: información de pago para actualizar -cue...@supporte.es 04/08/2020 12:29:36 am David Vallejo
• Are ASN.1 modules code or specification? Andreas Metzler
  • Re: Are ASN.1 modules code or specification? Walter Landry
  • Re: Are ASN.1 modules code or specification? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Are ASN.1 modules code or specification? Andreas Metzler
  • Re: Are ASN.1 modules code or specification? Florian Weimer
  • Re: Are ASN.1 modules code or specification? Andreas Metzler
• UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Mario.Limonciello
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Paul Wise
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Paul Wise
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Florian Weimer
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Paul Wise
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Florian Weimer
  • RE: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Mario.Limonciello
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Steve Langasek
  • RE: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Mario.Limonciello
  • Re: UEFI Revocation List being distributed by Debian Mario.Limonciello
• Stack Overflow and copyrightability of small snippets Rebecca N. Palmer
  • Re: Stack Overflow and copyrightability of small snippets vheu...@heuserlawoffice.com
  • Re: Stack Overflow and copyrightability of small snippets vheu...@heuserlawoffice.com
  • Re: Stack Overflow and copyrightability of small snippets Roberto
  • Re: Re: Stack Overflow and copyrightability of small snippets David Vallejo
• Follow up Lisa Turnbull
• Re: hfsprogs is not DFSG-Free John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: hfsprogs is not DFSG-Free Tobias Frost
• Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Tobias Frost
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Tobias Frost
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Tobias Frost
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Tobias Frost
  • Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant Francesco Poli
• RE: Recordatorio: información de pago para actualizar - cue...@supporte.es 04/08/2020 12:29:36 am Cuenta
• Corona virus prevention !! Holland Shielding Systems BV
• question about licensing for ruby-spdx-licenses Gabriel Filion
  • Re: question about licensing for ruby-spdx-licenses Florian Weimer
  • Re: question about licensing for ruby-spdx-licenses Gabriel Filion
• Re: Bug#952399: OpenSSL linking without license exception Bastian Germann
• Re: CC-BY-SA-4.0 Suttha Tinbutl
• consommation de carburant Madeleine Durand
• Copyright review for Lutris Stephan Lachnit
• FreeMedForms projet Eric Maeker
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Paul Wise
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Paul Wise
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Francesco Poli
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Eric Maeker
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Andreas Tille
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Eric Maeker
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Paul Wise
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Eric Maeker
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Paul Wise
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Michael Lustfield
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Paul Wise
  • Re: FreeMedForms projet Andreas Tille
• Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Patrick Matthäi
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Florian Weimer
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Patrick Matthäi
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Faidon Liambotis
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Patrick Matthäi
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Simon McVittie
  • Re: Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Michael Tremer
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Francesco Poli
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Roberto
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Francesco Poli
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Michael Tremer
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Michael Tremer
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change John Scott
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Tobias Frost
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Michael Tremer
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change J.B. Nicholson
  • Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change Michael Tremer
  • Not going to enforce the license? Pick a more lax, permissive free software license. J.B. Nicholson
  • CC-BY 4.0 Roberto
  • Re: Re: Maxmind GeoIP/Geolite license change James Repsel
• Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Florian Weimer
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Roberto
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Bagas Sanjaya
  • Re: Transity: GPL-licensed but Free only for Non-Commercials Eriberto
• Packaging text licenses Baptiste BEAUPLAT
  • Re: Packaging text licenses Jonas Smedegaard
  • Re: Packaging text licenses Baptiste BEAUPLAT
  • Re: Packaging text licenses Baptiste BEAUPLAT

• Earlier messages
• Later messages